AG HEALEY OPPOSES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTACK ON FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM

AG HEALEY OPPOSES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTACK ON FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMProposal Includes “Gag Rule” That Prevents Some Providers from Discussing Safe and Legal Abortions with Their Patients

            BOSTON – Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey today called on the Trump Administration to withdraw its dangerous and illegal proposed rule that would effectively dismantle Title X, the national family planning program that provides more than $6.1 million in funding for health care services for Massachusetts women and families annually. The Administration’s proposal includes a “gag rule” that effectively bans Title X providers from discussing safe and legal abortions with their patients. 

           

            In comments submitted today to the Department of Health and Human Services, AG Healey and the attorneys general of Washington, Oregon and Vermont argue that the proposed rule would prevent millions of low-income women and families across the country from accessing critical family planning and health care services. If finalized, the proposed rule will impede Title X recipients from offering complete care to their patients by illegally preventing doctors, nurses, and other health care providers from referring their patients to a legal abortion provider, except in cases where a woman has already decided to have an abortion prior to receiving counseling.

            “Every woman in Massachusetts and across the country deserves the ability to make informed decisions about her reproductive health care with her health care provider,” said AG Healey. “This dangerous proposal puts the health of more than four million women in the country at risk by robbing them of their access to critical services. We will defend women’s access to reproductive health care.”

In 2016 alone, 90 Title X Massachusetts service sites provided more than 66,000 residents with a range of health care services including contraceptive and infertility services, pregnancy testing and options counseling, screenings for cervical and breast cancer, screenings and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, and health education. According to the letter, these services not only make a profound difference in patients’ lives, they also save the state and the federal government an estimated $140 million per year, just for Massachusetts alone.  

According to the letter, Title X-funded centers helped avert 13,000 unintended pregnancies in Massachusetts. Access to family planning services, the letter contends, can enhance many aspects of a woman’s life including making it more likely that she will achieve her educational and career goals and that she will ultimately earn more money. These services can also lead to healthier relationships, better health outcomes, and better parenting.

The attorneys general argue that by severely curtailing the ability of health care providers to discuss abortion with patients, the government is interfering with the doctor-patient relationship and infringing on a woman’s ability to receive unbiased and complete medical information. This restriction, according to the letter, would jeopardize the health of low-income women and the ethical obligations of health care providers. The comments also criticize the proposed and onerous new requirement for clinics funded under program that perform abortions to have separate physical spaces for Title X funded services and abortion services, effectively requiring two separate clinics.

“I applaud Attorney General Healey for defending women’s basic rights and the most basic medical ethics, and for once again standing up to the Trump-Pence administration’s dangerous political interference in people’s health. The Trump-Pence administration’s gag rule is designed to dismantle an effective, bipartisan public health program in order to push an extreme ideological agenda,” Dr. Jennifer Childs-Roshak, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said. “The result of this gag rule is that people will not get the health care they need. They won’t get birth control, cancer screenings, STD testing and treatment, or even general health exams. We cannot allow political interference to undermine our ability to provide the best care and information to our patients. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts joins Attorney General Healey in calling on U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to withdraw this dangerous rule.”

“The aim of the domestic gag rule is clear — eliminate the majority of Title X providers in Massachusetts through harmful, unnecessary regulations and restrictions," NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts Executive Director Rebecca Hart Holder said. “The proposed rule poses a serious threat to Bay Staters by creating barriers to accessing critical preventative reproductive healthcare services they need and deserve. Title X program has been a critical safety next for Massachusetts for decades. Cuts to Title X will harm over 66,000 Massachusetts residents, many of whom are low-income and unable to access these essential healthcare services elsewhere. Attorney General Maura Healey is a true champion for reproductive freedom and we applaud her vocal opposition to this proposed new rule."

Today’s comments are part of AG Healey’s ongoing commitment to fight for women’s access to reproductive health care. Last year, AG Healey successfullyadvocated for the passage of legislation that requires all state-regulated plans to provide coverage without cost-sharing for all unique forms of FDA-approved contraceptives, allows doctors to prescribe a 12-month supply of contraceptives, and helps eliminate barriers to timely access to emergency contraceptives. In October 2017, AG Healey sued the Trump Administration for rolling back a requirement under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for employers to include birth control coverage in their health insurance plans.

This matter was handled by Legal Analyst Elizabeth Carnes Flynn of AG Healey’s Health Care Division, with assistance from Assistant Attorneys General Jonathan Miller, Chief of AG Healey’s Public Protection and Advocacy Bureau, Genevieve Nadeau, Chief of AG Healey’s Civil Rights Division, and Gabrielle Viator, Deputy Chief of AG Healey’s Policy and Government Division.

140+ Civil Rights Groups Call on Commerce Department to Strike Unnecessary Citizenship Question

140+ Civil Rights Groups Call on Commerce Department to Strike Unnecessary Citizenship Question

WASHINGTON – The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, along with 145 national, state, and local organizations today 

The groups write in part: “There is one constitutional purpose for the decennial census: to apportion seats in the U.S. House of Representatives among the 50 states, based on an enumeration of the ‘whole number of persons in each state’ … With this fundamental, constitutional purpose in mind, we urge the Census Bureau, in the strongest possible terms, to remove the proposed citizenship question from the 2020 Census form. This question will unnecessarily and, perhaps significantly, increase the cost of the 2020 Census, while collecting data at the census block level for which there is no credible or widely-accepted evidence of utility.”

In addition to the joint comments, The Leadership Conference Education Fund (the sister organization of The Leadership Conference), National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials (NALEO) Educational Fund, and Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC have launched a tool to facilitate participation in the public comment period on the questions proposed for the 2020 Census. The 60-day comment period, which ends on August 7, provides an opportunity to establish a strong, clear public record from a range of stakeholders who oppose the addition of a citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

The joint comments from the groups are available here.

MAYOR WALSH CALLS ON RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPERS FOR MULTI-CITY, LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS

MAYOR WALSH CALLS ON RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPERS FOR MULTI-CITY, LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS City of Boston leads Request for Information of large-scale renewable energy projects to meet the collective demand of 20 U.S. cities.

BOSTON - Tuesday, July 31, 2018 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh today is asking renewable energy developers and other interested parties to share ideas that could lead to one of the largest renewable energy projects of its kind in the country. The City of Boston released today a Request for Information (RFI) to obtain feedback from qualified renewable energy project developers with projects throughout the United States that could support the municipal energy demand of 20 cities included in the request. The total aggregate energy demand of all cities included in the request is nearly 5.7 terawatt-hours - enough to power over half a million US homes. "Climate change is not an issue a city can solve by itself -- but Boston's leadership can be far-reaching," said Mayor Walsh. "I applaud my colleagues in other cities for joining this effort to demonstrate our collective power in building a clean energy future, and I'm eager to see what is possible in terms of how we can power our cities and create more, clean energy jobs." The City of Boston is working with 19 other U.S. cities to request information on projects. The cities included in the request are Arlington, MA, Atlanta, GA, Boston, MA, Cambridge, MA, Chicago, IL, Evanston, IL, Gary, IN, Houston, TX, Los Angeles, CA, Manchester, NH, Medford, MA, Melrose, MA, Nashua, NH, Orlando, FL, Phoenix, AZ, Portland, ME, Portland, OR, Providence, RI, South Portland, ME, and Somerville, MA. "Cities wield the power to create demand and transform the energy market - and when we act together, we can show the world that environmental stewardship and economic prosperity go hand in hand," said Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti. "As a chair of Climate Mayors, I'm proud to stand beside Mayor Walsh in the work of amplifying the role of cities and upholding the goals of the Paris Climate Agreement." The request is focused on information regarding project sizing, geography, anticipated completion date, technology, and indicative pricing. The information gathered will inform a future joint purchase of renewable energy. This action demonstrates the collective power of cities to invest in renewable energy and create more, middle class, clean energy jobs. If successful, a large-scale purchase of renewable energy will help power these cities, save money, and offset carbon emissions. "As the energy capital of the world, Houston will play a critical role in transforming the way we power the future. Our city, the largest municipal user of renewable energy in the nation, is proof that even big cities in red states cities can act on climate and maintain a robust, growing economy," said Mayor Sylvester Turner. "This RFI is an example of visionary leadership and the ability to see the big picture from a national perspective is a breath of fresh air, and I applaud Mayor Walsh for calling on the private sector to come together with local leaders across the country in the fight against climate change," said Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel. "Mayor Walsh understands that we will only succeed in protecting the planet for future generations when we work together towards our common goal to bring down carbon emissions as is laid out in the Chicago Climate Charter." Mayor Walsh formally announced his plans for the renewable energy initiative earlier this summer at the International Mayors Climate Summit in Boston. Mayors from across the country and around the world joined Mayor Walsh and leaders from public and private sectors to discuss actions taken by mayors to address climate change globally and in their own communities. "Cities that invest in renewable energy are making the responsible choice for our global future and bringing our significant purchasing power to bear in the transition to a clean energy economy," said Mayor Ted Wheeler of Portland, Oregon. "All cities have a stake in the fight against climate change," said Evanston Mayor Stephen Hagerty. "I'm proud to partner with Mayor Walsh and mayors from across the country to explore ways to collectively reduce carbon emissions in our cities. Global climate action begins at the local level, and by working together we can have a much greater impact." Mayor Walsh is the Co-Chair of Climate Mayors, a network of U.S. mayors that participated in a similar joint-city initiative last year that demonstrates the collective power of cities to advance climate goals. The Climate Mayors initiative, led by the City of Los Angeles, issued an Electric Vehicle Request for Information (EV RFI) with 30 other cities in efforts to aggregate municipal demand of electric vehicles across the country. The EV RFI demonstrated demand for nearly 115,000 vehicles of all classes, including trash trucks, street sweepers, semis, shuttles, and buses - with an estimated value of $10 billion to replace the entire fleet. The RFI received 40 responses across all vehicle segments, and is now moving into a formal procurement. ABOUT BOSTON'S CLIMATE INITIATIVES Boston is taking bold action on climate to become a carbon neutral, climate ready city as outlined in its updated Climate Action Plan. Boston's Climate Action Plan serves as Boston's roadmap for reaching its goals of reducing carbon emissions and preparing for the impacts of climate change. The goals are supported by Imagine Boston 2030, the first citywide plan in 50 years, that helps to ensure that climate plays a role in aspects of city planning. The city's current climate initiatives are laying the groundwork to advance its climate goals and to accelerate progress. Carbon Free Boston is analyzing the options and pathways to achieve deep decarbonization. The initiative is weighing the costs and benefits of technologies and policies across key action areas including electric power, buildings, transportation, and waste. As part of this effort, Zero Waste Boston is exploring pathways to turn Boston into a zero waste city through planning, policy, and community engagement. Additionally, Climate Ready Boston is strengthening Boston's climate change resilience with near- and long-term planning. It is actively advancing Boston's vision of a resilient city through a comprehensive citywide vulnerability study, a community outreach program, and neighborhood-level implementation projects, including the installation of a flood wall in one of Boston's most flood-prone neighborhood. All of these initiatives will inform the upcoming update of Boston's Climate Action Plan.

78民權組織要求美眾議院開公聽會促實施家庭團聚法

After the Trump administration failed to meet a court-ordered family reunification deadline last week, The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights and 77 civil rights groups sent a letter urging the U.S. House of Representatives to convene oversight hearings to demand answers. The administration has missed all of its court-ordered deadlines for reuniting children with their parents, and, as the letter notes, “It is inappropriate for 435 House members to return to their districts and to their families for the August recess while more than 700 young children are still being kept from their parents.” Congress needs to ensure the administration fixes the catastrophe it created – including by providing far more clarity on its plans for reunifying families, explaining how it will address the trauma that children have suffered under this policy, and clearly spelling out plans for the expansion of humane, lawful, and cost-efficient alternatives to detention in the future.

The letter sent to Speaker of the House Paul Ryan and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi today can be read in its entirety here, and is pasted below my signature.

Letter to Speaker Ryan and Leader Pelosi re: Oversight of Family Separation Policy

July 30, 2018

Recipient: United States House of Representatives

Dear Speaker Ryan and Leader Pelosi:

On behalf of the undersigned civil and human rights organizations, we write to express our profound concern regarding the Trump administration’s unacceptably slow response to its self-created crisis of family separations at our Southern border. The administration has now missed all of its court-ordered deadlines for reuniting children with their parents, and we urge you to convene oversight hearings to demand answers about this cruel and ineffective policy. It is inappropriate for 435 House members to return to their districts and to their families for the August recess while more than 700 young children are still being kept from their parents.

As you know, in April, the Trump administration announced it would criminally prosecute all undocumented immigrants who were detained at the U.S.-Mexico border, even those seeking asylum, with no exceptions made for those who were traveling with their children. This resulted in parents being sent to jails, and in their children being taken away and placed in the custody of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In less than two months, more than 2,500 children were needlessly taken away from their parents.

While the bipartisan outcry against this cruel practice eventually pressured the administration to reconsider its approach, the damage to the affected children has been incalculable, and the administration’s response has been nothing short of incompetent. Last month, a federal district judge ordered the administration to reunite all children under the age of five with their parents within a two-week period. Only a fraction of children in that age group were reunited by the deadline, and weeks later, dozens remain separated. The same court also ordered the administration to reunite all children between 5 and 17 years of age within one month – and yesterday we learned that the government again has fallen far short. To complicate matters further, the administration acknowledged that it has deported as many as 468 parents without their children, making it likely that this crisis will continue for a significant period of time.

This summer, we saw the administration and its allies try to use this manufactured crisis as leverage to force votes on a slew of unrelated immigration law reforms. We now urge you to use your oversight and appropriations authority as leverage to ensure the administration fixes the catastrophe it created – including by providing far more clarity on its plans for reunifying families, explaining how it will address the trauma that children have suffered under this policy, and clearly spelling out plans for how it will instead use humane, lawful, and cost-efficient alternatives to detention in the future.

For example, the administration still needs to explain:

1. Why it is unilaterally making “eligibility” determinations that narrow the numbers of families that “qualify” for reunification;
2. What its plan and timeline is for finding deported parents and reunifying them with their children in the United States;
3. Why it is pushing to deport families as quickly as possible after reunification;
4. Why it continues to needlessly jail thousands of children, separated parents, and immigrants in inhumane ICE detention facilities when they are eligible for release; and
5. How it responds to reports that it has destroyed records related to family separations.

Again, this is not the time for Congress to return to their families while so many children are waiting to return to theirs. The Senate intends to hold a hearing this week, but we need both chambers of Congress to do everything in their power to help resolve this crisis. Members of Congress should also use this upcoming month to visit detention facilities nationwide as well as at the border, and with jailed immigrants to better understand the chaos and cruelty that this administration has wrought.

Sincerely,

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

Action Together Network

American Federation of Teachers

American Humanist Association

Andrew Goodman Foundation

Anti-Defamation League

Arab American Institute (AAI)

Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum

Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC

Asian Pacific American Labor Alliance

Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence

Autistic Self Advocacy Network

Center for Community Self-Help

Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)

Center for Popular Democracy

Children’s Defense Fund

Coalition on Human Needs

Conference of Major Superiors of Men (Catholic)

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

DC Coalition Against Domestic Violence

Defending Rights & Dissent

Democrats for Education Reform

Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund

Equal Justice Society

Equality California

Farmworker Justice

FORGE, Inc.

Freedom Network USA

Futures Without Violence

Hadassah, The Women’s Zionist Organization of America, Inc.

Hispanic Federation

Human Rights Campaign

Immigration Hub

Impact Fund

In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda

Japanese American Citizens League

Justice in Motion

Leadership Conference of Women Religious

Legal Momentum, the Women’s Legal Defense and Education Fund

Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service

Mi Familia Vota

Muslim Public Affairs Council

NAACP

NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

National Action Network

National Association of Human Rights Workers

National Association of Social Workers

National Black Justice Coalition

National Center for Transgender Equality

The National Council of Asian Pacific Americans (NCAPA)

National Council of Jewish Women

National Council on Independent Living (NCIL)

National Disability Rights Network

National Employment Law Project

National Immigrant Justice Center

National Immigration Law Center

National Indian Education Association

National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health

National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund

National Organization for Women

National Partnership for Women & Families

National Women’s Law Center

Oxfam America

Partnership for America’s Children

Sargent Shriver National Center on Poverty Law

SEIU

Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

Sikh American Legal Defense and education Fund

The Sikh Coalition

Sisters of Mercy of the Americas – Institute Justice Team

Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC)

Teach Plus

Truman National Security Project

U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants

UnidosUS (formerly National Council of La Raza)

Union for Reform Judaism

United Church of Christ

YWCA USA

哈佛大學否認招生歧視亞裔

(Boston Orange整理)哈佛大學在週五(7月27日)早上遞交給法庭的文件中，費力地否認該校歧視亞裔美籍申請者的指控。

           這所長春藤大學的錄取學生作法，是一樁聯邦平權法律訴訟的中心焦點。該校辯稱重視亞裔美籍申請者的族裔背景，並未基於族裔來設定錄取學生數額的上限。

哈佛表示，在那辯稱哈佛歧視背後的統計分析錯得很厲害，導致誤導性敘述。在另一份聲明中，哈佛辯稱控告該校的組織創造了900份應該是無可爭論事實的圖表，其中有許多卻既非無可爭論，還甚至不是事實。

哈佛大學在週五遞交的報告是代表數名亞裔美籍學生的”學生爭取公平錄取(Students for Fair Admissions)”所提出，持續進行中的控告案件的一部分。

在遞交的文件中，哈佛堅稱"學生爭取公平錄取”迄今拿出來的證據遠不足以證明有意歧視，也不符合代表該組織的快速判斷標準。

哈佛稱其對手六月份遞交的一份”45頁新聞稿，致力於陳現誤導敘述，明顯的需要真正爭辯”。

代表”學生爭取公ˊ錄取”的主要人物Edward Blum週五在一份聲明中表示，”學生爭取錄取公平”期待十月份在審訊中陳現個案，到時候剩餘的節錄資料，備忘錄，電子郵件，以及哈佛大學拒絕透露的證詞，將會被公開。

           這風險很高的案子可能會轉變大專院校在錄取學生時如何考慮種族，大學領導，法律學者，保守及自由群體，以及美國司法部都密切關注。

“學生爭取公平錄取”的會長Edward Blum曾經餐與反平權行動個案，最近還支持德州大學一名白人學生挑戰基於種族的入學許可。在德州大學的這宗個案中，最高法院決定，大學可用種族作為許多因素之一。

不過哈佛大學這案子，為反對平權行動打開了新的一面，指控那傷害了亞裔美籍大學申請者。

數個外界團體很可能在未來數週遞交在這案件中他們自己的摘要。川普總統下的司法部以鼓勵學校廢除基於種族意識的入學許可政策，本月稍早還推翻了奧巴馬時代的平權行動指導原則。一些專家稱那是該部門也將涉入哈佛個案的訊號。

這個案子排定10月15日審訊，大多數的專家都預期在未來年月中，最終會到最高法院去。

“學生爭取公平錄取”聲稱哈佛限制接受亞裔美籍申請者的數目，而且從整個的學術圈來看，亞裔美籍學生在個人美德這一項上，從大學入學許可官員納德到的評分，遠低於他們的同儕，根據他們對申請書的審閱，”學生爭取錄取公平”聲稱有許多申請成為哈佛1600名新生之一的亞裔美籍學生，被形容為”標準優秀(standard strong)”，即使他們的學術表現比被入學許可官做同樣形容的其他族裔學生更好。

不過哈佛在週五時說，形容學生”標準優秀”並不是一個稱號。事實上，哈佛辯稱，它訓練入學許可官要了解各種亞裔美籍社區之間的細微不同，避免把他們當做一個集團來處理。

           哈佛在遞交的文件中指出，該校的入學許可辦公室強調，一個學生的家長都是在印度的西藏難民營中出生的，另一名越南申請人是家中第一個上大學的小孩，還是全市最好學校的畢業致詞生。

哈佛也批評”學生爭取公平錄取"用來分析該校入學許可數據的方法，因為那排除了在過程中獲得特別優惠的申請者，包括招募體育健將，以及校友的孩子。”學生爭取公平錄取”在法庭文件中承認，並列舉了這些做法，哈佛大學表示把那從核心資料排除所做的分析，偏頗了結果。

哈佛認為，他們的證據顯示，該校在入學許可上洽當的使用了種族做審核元素，亞裔美籍學生並未在過程中被懲罰。

在兩個特定時段、地段經過的人 請檢查是否感染麻疹

CITY OFFICIALS ALERT OF POTENTIAL MEASLES EXPOSURE IN BOSTON

BOSTON – Friday, July 27, 2018 ­– The Boston Public Health Commission (BPHC) today alerted the public of a potential measles exposure at two Boston locations, after receiving notification of a confirmed case of measles. Anyone who visited the following locations during the specified dates and times could become ill between July 26 and August 10, 2018: Tasty Burger at 1301 Boylston Street on July 19, 2018 between 7 p.m. - 11 p.m., and Logan Airport Terminal B on July 20, 2018 between 8:30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. Measles is a highly contagious virus that is spread through the air through coughing and sneezing. The virus may remain in the environment for up to two hours after the infectious person has left the area. Exposure can occur even without direct contact with an infectious person. Early symptoms include a high fever, runny nose, cough, and red eyes. A skin rash usually occurs three to five days later and begins as flat, red spots on the face. If experiencing these symptoms, people are advised to contact their health care provider by phone immediately for further instructions. If a person has had measles in the past or has received two doses of the vaccine, they are unlikely to become ill even if exposed. If they are uncertain of their immunity status, BPHC recommends monitoring for symptoms and contacting their health care provider. BPHC is working with other health officials on this case and monitoring for potential exposures. BPHC has also reached out to Boston residents to increase awareness about risk of exposure and encourage people who were potentially exposed to call their health care provider by phone for further instructions.

中華公所可負擔住宅土地發展案有望添為三項

                            (Boston Orange 周菊子整理報導)紐英崙中華公所即將於7月31日舉行本年度第四次董事大會。公所主席陳家驊提交的9點報告，透露中華公所籌畫中的可負擔住宅土地發展計畫可能增為三項。

              其中兩項是在中華公所董事大會中討論過許多次的喜露街50號，以及大同村南停車場。

              新增的是，泰勒街78號，波士頓天主教會擁有的樓宇，一旦波士頓市政府搓合成功，中華公所就可向波士頓天主教會買下那座樓宇來改建。。

              喜露街50號的可負擔住宅計畫，為爭取建造更多數量的可負擔住宅，中華公所和戴維斯公司(TDC)，波士頓華人佈道會(BCEC)攜手，申請成為”指定計畫區域(PDA)”，以期樓宇的可建高度，容積率等可適用於市政府相對寬鬆的限制要求。

              中華公所主席陳家驊在報告中指出，波士頓計畫發展局(BPDA)在7月12日的董事會議中，批准了位於所物道/華盛頓街區塊的這發展計畫，下一步將是等區域規畫委員會(zoning commission)在9月12日批准這區域劃分的變更，然後由波士頓市長簽署通過。估計過程會很順利。

              根據中華公所和戴維斯公司的協議，中華公所可從戴維斯公司那兒獲得大約10萬元，做為提出大樓設計方案的補償費用，在相關單位批准PDA申請後的30天申訴期內，若無人申訴或者申訴無效，中華公所還可獲得15萬元的完成費。這筆錢將可容許中華公所聘請一名發展主任來管理中華公所預定經辦的土地發展計畫，包括喜露街50號，大同村南停車場。

根據波士頓市政府的包容發展政策(IDP)，戴維斯公司的土地發展計畫，必須建造28個可負擔住宅，或者交給政府等同28個住宅單位的一筆錢。中華公所正在和戴維斯公司協商，若把這28個單位放進中華公所的喜露街50號發展計畫中，得付給中華公所多少錢。戴維斯公司計畫今年稍後或明年初破土動工。

稍後，戴維斯公司也得和波士頓華人佈道會展開同樣的對話。

陳家驊提議中華公所董事先在內部討論，是否立即要求戴維斯公司提出方案，或者先聘請建築師來做好中華公所大樓的進一步設計，再說。因為中華公所自己的發展計畫案越成熟，談判就有更好的依據。

中華公所也已經在和波士頓鄰里發展局(DND)討論把喜露街50號改建成可負擔住宅的財務問題。

在不久的將來，中華公所也需要和喜露街50號的承租商，中國超市，認真討論提早結束合約的可行性，以推進建造可負擔住宅計畫。

中華公所預定八月份安排一次特別董事會，報告喜露街50號和大同村停車場計畫的最新進展。

              陳家驊也指出，擴建大同村一案，已有榮氏(Winn)，畢肯(Beacon)，以及亞美社區發展協會(ACDC)等三個機構提交了了發展計畫，中華公所備有紙印版，公所董事有興趣翻閱，都可索取。

              中華公所也已和鄰里發展局(DND)的席拉狄倫(Sheila Dillon )、克莉絲汀歐奇菲(Christine O’Keefe)，波士頓計畫發展局(BPDA)的提姆戴維斯(Tim Davis)談過，估計可從波士頓市政府獲得合理補助數額。中華公所將藉由這些資訊，向前述三機構提出進一步問題，並在本月稍後再審閱他們的回應。

              中華公所會就大同村停車場和喜露街50號舉行特別會議。

七月廿四日時，陳家驊和朱蘇珊，雷國輝，陳毓禮，陳文棟等人和波士頓市長Walsh，鄰里發展局局長席拉狄倫，及徐丹晨晤談。

在會議中，波士頓市長同意搓合中華公所和天主教區協商，由天主教區把泰勒街78號賣給中華公所，以建造可負擔住宅(藉著增加幾層樓，可能會是10到12個家庭單位)。波士頓市長也提議把來自必珠街酒店項目的社區福利，以及來自市府的一些財務援助，交給泰勒街78號發展計畫。

              陳家驊在主席報告中表示，由於中華公所將有幾項土地發展計畫，他希望要求董事大會授權財務小組，以及物業小組來聯合決定聘請發展管理人員的職稱，職務描述，資格及薪資(年薪不超過10萬元，福利不超過30%)。另外再授權聯席小組委員會搜尋候選人，面談，並於九月會議中推薦人選。

              陳家驊還報告，黃光野和黃氏公所控告中華公所一案，仍在調查階段。黃氏公所已兩次和中華公所接觸，試圖找尋解決辦法，不過兩次都沒下文。中華公所的立場是，會盡力尋求共同點，會參與任何進一步的解決問題努力。

              陳家驊指出，不幸的是，關於這宗訟案，有不正確的資訊在坊間流傳。他認為中華公所的董事們應該很清楚，此案原告是黃氏公所和黃光野先生。法院已頒發初步禁制令，暫時延緩執行中華公所董事大會的2017年5月9日決議案。這禁制令在此案最後解決前有效，也就是如果原告撤銷告訴，中華公所的決議案就有效，黃光野的顧問頭銜將被撤銷，擔任出席中華公所代表董事的權力也將被暫停三年。除非雙方達成協議，此案仍在法庭審理中。

中華公所有紙張版的黃光野和陳家驊口供抄錄本，但將只提供給中華公所董事過目。

關於塔芙茨大學(Tufts)獎學金一事，中華公所還在和該校協商條款。中華公所已招募數名塔芙茨大學校友來提供想法和建議，也在向大學施壓。

中華公所也試著遊說塔芙茨大學允許餐館顧客晚上在以前的青年會會址停車。那並不容易，但他們在嘗試。

              另外，中華公所應於五月十五日交給總檢察官辦公室的報告，已在五月廿四日交出去了。該報告的電子版，附在五月廿九日的中華公所主席報告中，在中華公所辦公室也有紙張版供索取。下一次交報告的日期預訂為八月十五日。