網頁

Thursday, February 14, 2013

長春藤學校設有錄取亞美學生限額?


Ivy Schools set an Asian Am. quota

          
    17% +/- 2% but “Not a Quota”?
Dear Fellow Asian Americans and Friends,
   When it looks like a DUCK, swims like a DUCK, and quacks like a DUCK,
it is a DUCK!
   Ron Unz’s summary on an "AsAm Quota" and his much longer “meritocracy”
article generated ferocious debates from all sides regarding race-
conscious college admissions, yet conspicuously missing is any challenge
to his key finding that all Ivy Leagues converge to a 17% +/- 2% AsAm
"quota" despite strong demographic and academic performance trends
otherwise. In the absence of contradicting data, such a convergence
is not explainable other than suggesting A HIDDEN QUOTA.
   THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING.
   When will the civil right community, including many of the AsAm
organizations, seriously evaluate this data convergence and benchmark it
against the basic American value of fairness? Since when does the
high ideal of “Equal Opportunity” become synonymous to “Equal Outcome”?
   Just insisting there is “no AsAm quota” is of no merit unless backed by
data. Such a claim also has a bad track record: No university ever
admitted to having a Jewish quota during 1920-1950, even though it is
now an universally accepted fact. Authored by: A Guest Writer
   FORWARD this e-newsletter to all Asian Am Ivy students. Ask them to
spread these FACTUAL INFO all over their campuses. When the people
with power e.g. Ivy administrators are DISCRIMINATING AGAINST
US BY LYING AND PRACTICING ILLEGAL POLICIES (quota is illegal),
RIDICULE THEM !!
   Ron Unz’s summary on an "AsAm Quota" was published by The
National Review. It was cited by SCOTUSblog (Supreme court of the US
blog) which may hopefully have an impact on the Supreme Court decision.
The article also summarized S. B. Woo's piece in NY Times' Room for Debate.
Sincerely,
S. B. Woo, President, a volunteer
80-20 National Asian Am. Educational Foundation
http://www.80-20EF.org 

No comments:

Post a Comment