網頁

星期二, 3月 12, 2019

ARRESTS MADE IN NATIONWIDE COLLEGE ADMISSIONS SCAM

ARRESTS MADE IN NATIONWIDE COLLEGE ADMISSIONS SCAM:
ALLEGED EXAM CHEATING & ATHLETIC RECRUITMENT SCHEME
Defendants include CEOs, actresses, university athletic coaches, and college exam administrators

BOSTON – Dozens of individuals involved in a nationwide conspiracy that facilitated cheating on college entrance exams and the admission of students to elite universities as purported athletic recruits were arrested by federal agents in multiple states this morning and charged in federal court in Boston. Athletic coaches from Yale, Stanford, USC, Wake Forest and Georgetown, among others, are implicated, as well as parents and exam administrators. 

William “Rick” Singer, 58, of Newport Beach, Calif., was charged with racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Singer owned and operated the Edge College & Career Network LLC (“The Key”) – a for-profit college counseling and preparation business – and served as the CEO of the Key Worldwide Foundation (KWF) – a non-profit corporation that he established as a purported charity.

Between approximately 2011 and February 2019, Singer allegedly conspired with dozens of parents, athletic coaches, a university athletics administrator, and others, to use bribery and other forms of fraud to secure the admission of students to colleges and universities including Yale University, Georgetown University, Stanford University, the University of Southern California, and Wake Forest University, among others. Also charged for their involvement in the scheme are 33 parents and 13 coaches and associates of Singer’s businesses, including two SAT and ACT test administrators. 

Also charged is John Vandemoer, the head sailing coach at Stanford University, Rudolph “Rudy” Meredith, the former head soccer coach at Yale University, and Mark Riddell, a counselor at a private school in Bradenton, Fla. 

The conspiracy involved 1) bribing SAT and ACT exam administrators to allow a test taker, typically Riddell, to secretly take college entrance exams in place of students or to correct the students’ answers after they had taken the exam; 2) bribing university athletic coaches and administrators—including coaches at Yale, Stanford, Georgetown, the University of Southern California, and the University of Texas—to facilitate the admission of students to elite universities under the guise of being recruited as athletes; and (3) using the façade of Singer’s charitable organization to conceal the nature and source of the bribes.  


1)      College Entrance Exam Cheating Scheme
According to the charging documents, Singer facilitated cheating on the SAT and ACT exams for his clients by instructing them to seek extended time for their children on college entrance exams, which included having the children purport to have learning disabilities in order to obtain the required medical documentation. Once the extended time was granted, Singer allegedly instructed the clients to change the location of the exams to one of two test centers: a public high school in Houston, Texas, or a private college preparatory school in West Hollywood, Calif. At those test centers, Singer had established relationships with test administrators Niki Williams and Igor Dvorskiy, respectively, who accepted bribes of as much as $10,000 per test in order to facilitate the cheating scheme. Specifically, Williams and Dvorskiy allowed a third individual, typically Riddell, to take the exams in place of the students, to give the students the correct answers during the exams, or to correct the students’ answers after they completed the exams. Singer typically paid Ridell $10,000 for each student’s test. Singer’s clients paid him between $15,000 and $75,000 per test, with the payments structured as purported donations to the KWF charity. In many instances, the students taking the exams were unaware that their parents had arranged for the cheating.

2)      College Recruitment Scheme
It is further alleged that throughout the conspiracy, parents paid Singer approximately $25 million to bribe coaches and university administrators to designate their children as purported athletic recruits, thereby facilitating the children’s’ admission to those universities. Singer allegedly described the scheme to his customers as a “side door,” in which the parents paid Singer under the guise of charitable donations to KWF. In turn, Singer funneled those payments to programs controlled by the athletic coaches, who then designated the children as recruited athletes – regardless of their athletic experience and abilities. Singer also made bribe payments to most of the coaches personally.

For example, during a call with one parent, Singer stated: “Okay, so, who we are…what we do is we help the wealthiest families in the U.S. get their kids into school…My families want a guarantee. So, if you said to me ‘here’s our grades, here’s our scores, here’s our ability, and we want to go to X school’ and you give me one or two schools, and then I’ll go after those schools and try to get a guarantee done.” 

As part of the scheme, Singer directed employees of The Key and the KWF to create falsified athletic “profiles” for students, which were then submitted to the universities in support of the students’ applications. The profiles included fake honors that the students purportedly received and elite teams that they purportedly played on.  In some instances, parents supplied Singer with staged photos of their children engaged in athletic activity – such as using a rowing machine or purportedly playing water polo.

3)      Tax Fraud Conspiracy
Beginning around 2013, Singer allegedly agreed with certain clients to disguise bribe payments as charitable contributions to the KWF, thereby enabling clients to deduct the bribes from their federal income taxes. Specifically, Singer allegedly instructed clients to make payments to the KWF in return for facilitating their children’s admission to a chosen university. Singer used a portion of that money to bribe university athletic coaches to designate the children as student athletes. Thereafter, Masera or another KWF employee mailed letters from the KWF to the clients expressing thanks for their purported charitable contributions. The letter stated: “Your generosity will allow us to move forward with our plans to provide educational and self-enrichment programs to disadvantaged youth,” and falsely indicated that “no good or services were exchanged” for the donations. Many clients then filed personal tax returns that falsely reported the payment to the KWF as charitable donations.

            The charge of racketeering conspiracy provides for a sentence of no greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater and restitution. The charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, up to three years of supervised release, and a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the money laundering. The charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States provides for a sentence of no greater than five years in prison, up to three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of obstruction of justice provides for a sentence of no greater than 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charges of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, and of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services wire fraud, provide for a sentence of no greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of 250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

            United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Joseph R. Bonavolonta, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field Division; and Kristina O’Connell, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigations in Boston, made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Eric S. Rosen, Justin D. O’Connell, Leslie Wright, and Kristen A. Kearney of Lelling’s Securities and Financial Fraud Unit are prosecuting the case.

            The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

###
Appendix

1.      William Rick Singer, 58, of Newport Beach, Calif., owner of the Edge College & Career Network and CEO of the Key Worldwide Foundation, was charged in an Information with racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and obstruction of justice.  He is scheduled to plead guilty in Boston before U.S. District Court Judge Rya W. Zobel on March 12, 2019, at 2:30 p.m.;
2.      Mark Riddell, 36, of Palmetto, Fla., was charged in an Information with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud as well as conspiracy to commit money laundering;
3.      Rudolph “Rudy” Meredith, 51, of Madison, Conn., the former head women’s soccer coach at Yale University, was charged in an Information with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services wire fraud as well as honest services wire fraud; 
4.      John Vandemoer, 41, of Stanford, Calif., the former sailing coach at Stanford University, was charged in an Information with racketeering conspiracy and is expected to plead guilty in Boston before U.S. District Court Judge Rya W. Zobel on March 12, 2019, at 3:00 p.m.;
5.      David Sidoo, 59, of Vancouver, Canada, was charged in an indictment with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud. Sidoo was arrested on Friday, March 8th in San Jose, Calif., and appeared in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California yesterday. A date for his initial appearance in federal court in Boston has not yet been scheduled. 
The following defendants were charged in an indictment with racketeering conspiracy:

6.      Igor Dvorskiy, 52, of Sherman Oaks, Calif., director of a private elementary and high school in Los Angeles and a test administrator for the College Board and ACT;
7.      Gordon Ernst, 52, of Chevy Chase, Md., former head coach of men and women’s tennis at Georgetown University;
8.      William Ferguson, 48, of Winston-Salem, N.C., former women’s volleyball coach at Wake Forest University;
9.      Martin Fox, 62, of Houston, Texas, president of a private tennis academy in Houston;
10.  Donna Heinel, 57, of Long Beach, Calif., the senior associate athletic director at the University of Southern California;
11.  Laura Janke, 36, of North Hollywood, Calif., former assistant coach of women’s soccer at the University of Southern California;
12.  Ali Khoroshahin, 49, of Fountain Valley, Calif., former head coach of women’s soccer at the University of Southern California;
13.  Steven Masera, 69, of Folsom, Calif., accountant and financial officer for the Edge College & Career Network and the Key Worldwide Foundation;
14.  Jorge Salcedo, 46, of Los Angeles, Calif., former head coach of men’s soccer at the University of California at Los Angeles;
15.  Mikaela Sanford, 32, of Folsom, Calif., employee of the Edge College & Career Network and the Key Worldwide Foundation;
16.  Jovan Vavic, 57, of Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., former water polo coach at the University of Southern California; and
17.  Niki Williams, 44, of Houston, Texas, assistant teacher at a Houston high school and test administrator for the College Board and ACT.
The following defendant was charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud:

18.  Michael Center, 54, of Austin Texas, head coach of men’s tennis at the University of Texas at Austin
The following defendants were charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud:

19.  Gregory Abbott, 68, of New York, N.Y., the founder and chairman of a food and beverage packaging company;
20.  Marcia Abbott, 59, of New York, N.Y.;
21.  Gamal Abdelaziz, 62, of Las Vegas, Nev., the former senior executive of a resort and casino operator in Macau, China;
22.  Diane Blake, 55, of San Francisco, Calif., an executive at a retail merchandising firm;
23.  Todd Blake, 53, of San Francisco, Calif., an entrepreneur and investor;
24.  Jane Buckingham, 50, of Beverly Hills, Calif., the CEO of a boutique marketing company;
25.  Gordon Caplan, 52, of Greenwich, Conn., co-chairman of an international law firm based in New York City;
26.  I-Hin “Joey” Chen, 64, of Newport Beach, Calif., operates a provider of warehousing and related services for the shipping industry;
27.  Amy Colburn, 59, of Palo Alto, Calif.;
28.  Gregory Colburn, 61, of Palo Alto, Calif.;
29.  Robert Flaxman, 62, of Laguna Beach, Calif., founder and CEO of real estate development firm;
30.  Mossimo Giannulli, 55, of Los Angeles, Calif., fashion designer;
31.  Elizabeth Henriquez, 56, of Atherton, Calif.;
32.  Manuel Henriquez, 55, of Atherton, Calif., founder, chairman and CEO of a publicly traded specialty finance company;
33.  Douglas Hodge, 61, of Laguna Beach, Calif., former CEO of investment management company;
34.  Felicity Huffman, 56, of Los Angeles, Calif., an actress;
35.  Agustin Huneeus Jr., 53, of San Francisco, Calif., owner of wine vineyards;
36.  Bruce Isackson, 61, of Hillsborough, Calif., president of a real estate development firm;
37.  Davina Isackson, 55, of Hillsborough, Calif.;
38.  Michelle Janavs, 48, of Newport Coast, Calif., former executive of a large food manufacturer; 
39.  Elisabeth Kimmel, 54, of Las Vegas, Nev., owner and president of a media company;
40.  Marjorie Klapper, 50, of Menlo Park, Calif., co-owner of jewelry business;
41.  Lori Loughlin, 54, of Los Angeles, Calif., an actress;
42.  Toby MacFarlane, 56, of Del Mar, Calif., former senior executive at a title insurance company;
43.  William McGlashan Jr., 55, of Mill Valley, Calif., senior executive at a global equity firm;
44.  Marci Palatella, 63, of Healdsburg, Calif., CEO of a liquor distribution company;
45.  Peter Jan Sartorio, 53, of Menlo Park, Calif., packaged food entrepreneur;
46.  Stephen Semprevivo, 53, of Los Angeles, Calif., executive at privately held provider of outsourced sales teams;
47.  Devin Sloane, 53, of Los Angeles, Calif., founder and CEO of provider of drinking and wastewater systems;
48.  John Wilson, 59, of Hyannis Port, Mass., founder and CEO of private equity and real estate development firm;
49.  Homayoun Zadeh, 57, of Calabasas, Calif., an associate professor of dentistry; and
50.  Robert Zangrillo, 52, of Miami, Fla., founder and CEO of private investment firm.

BPDA and Fort Point Channel Operations Board seek creative proposals for water-based programming in Fort Point

BPDA and Fort Point Channel Operations Board seek creative proposals for water-based programming in Fort Point

The Boston Planning & Development Agency (BPDA) and the Fort Point Channel Operations Board are accepting applications for the 2019 Fort Point Channel Watersheet Activation Grant Program. The application is linked here.Now in its eighth year, the program provides financial resources for capital improvements and public programming within and along the Fort Point Channel, as envisioned in the Fort Point Channel Watersheet Activation Plan. The plan was established in 2002 through a collaborative effort between the BPDA, City of Boston, landowners, nonprofit and cultural leaders, and residents to encourage new cultural activities and year-round programming in Fort Point.
Approximately $50,000 is available to organizations for the 2019 grant cycle. The competitive grant seeks creative proposals for water-based programming in and around Fort Point that will benefit the general public, including such things as new water-based infrastructure, public events, art installations, and educational opportunities.
To be eligible, an organization must be tax-exempt or operate under the fiscal sponsorship of a tax-exempt nonprofit. For-profit organizations may be eligible for funding at the discretion of the Fort Point Channel Operations Board if the project constitutes a not-for-profit, public project.
Applications are due on April 12, 2019 at 5 p.m. Funding for the grants stems from the Chapter 91 Waterways Regulations License for Atlantic Wharf, a project developed by Boston Properties.

謝清志將於3/16在波士頓闡述台灣太空計畫


中華專協講座 吳懿峰、楊尚憲談免疫治療

【紐英崙中華專業人員協會健康講座】
紐英崙中華專業人員協會於3月9日在波士頓僑教中心舉辦本年第一場專業講座,邀請吳懿峰及楊尚憲等2位花蓮慈濟醫院主治醫師以「免疫治療-癌症療法的新契機」為題發表專題演講,共吸引60餘人到場聆聴,並和兩位講座就相關議題交換意見,與會人士咸感受益良多。
僑教中心主任歐宏偉應邀於開場時致詞,他鼓勵僑胞鄉親多加參與僑社活動及申辦「僑胞卡」,也特別感謝專業人員協會蕭蔚董事長和彭淑敏會長以及所有幹部的努力,並盛讚該會舉辦多項活動的付出與貢獻;駐波士頓臺北經文處科技組組長謝水龍也應邀與會,他期許未來能與各專業僑團有更多合作與交流的機會。
這場座談會的主持人是由藍凡耘醫師擔任,他是哈佛大學公共衛生研究生院博士生以及成大醫院職業及環境醫學部主治醫師,畢業於台灣大學醫學系,擁有成功大學環境與職業醫學研究所碩士,且歷任台大醫院不分科住院醫師、成大醫院職業及環境醫學部總醫師,專精於職業及環境醫學。他以幽默風趣的方式介紹兩位講座,並擔任主持座談的工作,令人印象深刻。
講座吳懿峰醫師是波士頓兒童醫院訪問學者,他是花蓮慈濟醫院血液腫瘤科主治醫師,畢業於慈濟大學醫學系,擁有慈濟大學毒理藥理碩士,且歷任慈濟醫院內科住院醫師、彰化基督教醫院血液腫瘤研究醫師和花蓮慈濟醫院內科總醫師。他具有多年的血癌治療經驗,專精於血小板及凝血疾病、血液疾病、骨髓移植、內科癌症。
另一位講座楊尚憲醫師也是波士頓兒童醫院訪問學者,以及花蓮慈濟醫院小兒科主治醫師,同時也擔任中華民國兒童癌症基金會顧問醫師和慈濟骨髓幹細胞中心副主任暨醫務及組織相容諮詢委員會主任,畢業於慈濟大學醫學系,歷任慈濟醫院小兒科住院醫師、花蓮慈濟醫院小兒血液腫瘤研究醫師和臺大醫院小兒血液腫瘤科研究醫師,具有多年的兒童血癌治療經驗,專精於小兒科學、小兒血液腫瘤疾病、骨髓移植、造血幹細胞捐贈。楊醫師的許多獲獎紀錄及發表著作請詳見https://bit.ly/2Ej3dWR。(圖與文;波士頓僑教中心)



Baker-Polito Administration Announces Health Connector Completes Successful Open Enrollment with Highest-Ever Membership, Covering 282,000 People with Health Insurance

Baker-Polito Administration Announces Health Connector Completes Successful Open Enrollment with Highest-Ever Membership, Covering 282,000 People with Health Insurance
Encourages small business to consider Health Connector for Business to save money on premiums, and offer plan and coverage choice to employees.

BOSTON – Governor Baker announced today that the Massachusetts Health Connector completed Open Enrollment with the highest membership in the 13-year history of the state’s health insurance exchange, covering 282,000 people with health insurance.

“The Health Connector just completed its most successful Open Enrollment since the start of the Affordable Care Act, signing up more than 65,000 new people with health insurance coverage,” said Governor Charlie Baker. “Massachusetts leads the way with the best insured rate in the country, with over 97 percent of our residents covered due in part to the Health Connector’s strong efforts to create a culture of coverage in the Commonwealth.”

“The Health Connector plays an important role in ensuring communities across the Commonwealth have access to affordable, high-quality health care,” saidLieutenant Governor Karyn Polito. “Over the last four years, the Connector has worked tirelessly to transform the exchange into a functional and reliable service as is evident by its current milestone enrollment figures.” 

The Health Connector held Open Enrollment from Nov. 1-Jan. 23, twice as long as the federal government’s Nov. 1-Dec. 15 open period, to ensure Massachusetts residents had as much time as possible to shop for affordable coverage. Throughout Open Enrollment, Massachusetts residents were encouraged to get covered or stay covered, to provide security for their health and financial well-being, and comply with the state’s individual mandate.  Assistance was available through community based health Navigators around the state.

“Massachusetts shines as a model for the rest of the nation when it comes to getting people enrolled in health insurance–and maintaining coverage,” saidHealth and Human Services Secretary and Connector Board Chair Marylou Sudders. “That success is built off outreach and education efforts that effectively and efficiently target the state’s under-insured communities and get more people covered.  This year the Connector made inroads in these tough-to-reach uninsured groups.”

As of March 1, 282,114 people were enrolled in health insurance, including 209,973 people in the ConnectorCare program. Through the state’s innovative affordability program, ConnectorCare, state subsidies are made available on top of federal tax credits, resulting in lower premium costs for members – including $0 premiums for the lowest-income enrollees – while also offering zero dollar or low co-pays and no deductibles. Overall, Health Connector membership rose 13 percent, compared to a 4 percent enrollment decrease through the federal Healthcare.gov platform.  In addition, 18,000 individuals receive dental insurance through the Connector.

“With stable operations and a clear message to get covered and stay covered, this was our most successful Open Enrollment to date, with high retention rates and strong new enrollment,” said Louis Gutierrez, the Executive Director of the Massachusetts Health Connector. “We are going to keep working to ensure that everyone in Massachusetts is covered.”

Open Enrollment for Individuals
The Health Connector placed extra focus on outreach and public education about affordable coverage options in communities with higher rates of uninsurance and worked to raise public awareness about coverage generally. At the close of Open Enrollment, the Health Connector had enrolled more than 65,000 people who did not have Health Connector coverage at the start of Open Enrollment, about 22 percent more than last year. Nearly half of the new enrollments came from 21 communities targeted as under-insured through a data-driven strategy that included grassroots and creative enrollment and public awareness raising activities.

In a survey of more than 2,000 new members, more members who had been uninsured for significant periods signed up for 2019 coverage. In 2017, 20.2 percent of respondents said they were uninsured for six months or longer, and in 2019, 21.8 percent said they were uninsured at least six months.

The Health Connector finished Open Enrollment with a retention rate of 89.7 percent, about 2.7 percent higher than last year’s retention rate. Throughout Open Enrollment, the Health Connector engaged in a public social media campaign encouraging residents to #StayCovered, highlighting the continuing requirement that residents have health coverage that meets state standards, even as the federal individual mandate penalties end for 2019.

With stable premiums for 2019 (building off the Health Connector’s success of having the lowest exchange rates in the country in 2018, according to data from the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services), fewer renewing members switched plans in 2019, resulting in a stable membership experience moving into the new year.

Health Connector for Business
In response to the increasing costs of insurance for small businesses, the Health Connector reshaped its small-business platform last year to offer highly competitive, high quality and low cost health insurance coverage for companies with less than 50 employees.  The Health Connector for Business currently helps 1,300 small businesses save money on premiums by offering health plan and coverage options to their employees.  Currently nine health plans and more than 50 plan options are available for April coverage.  Small businesses can compare premiums and save on average 20 percent than they might otherwise pay.

Additionally, small businesses can earn a rebate through the Connector’s newConnectWell program, an online-based wellness program.   The program offers employers a chance to save money while their employees improve their health and wellness.  Employers can save up to 15% on the amount they contribute toward employees’ health insurance premiums if one-third of their employees’ successfully complete one of the program’s qualifying wellness activities. The average ConnectWell rebate for a business is $4,880. Employees enrolled in their group’s health plan will also have the chance to earn a $100 reward when they complete a qualifying wellness activity.

The Health Connector currently serves more than 1,300 business and 300,000 individuals and small-employer members with health and dental insurance. Access to affordable health coverage for individuals and small businesses can be found at the Health Connector’s website, MAhealthconnector.org.

韓國瑜四月訪波士頓 台灣同鄉聯誼會籌辦歡迎僑宴

"韓流"即將來襲波士頓,70多人出席討論。(張雨坤攝)
全美台灣同鄉聯誼會會長馬滌凡是這次僑宴
的組織者。
(張雨坤攝)
(Boston Orange 張雨坤波士頓報導) 高雄市市長韓國瑜預定4月中訪美,新英格蘭地區70多名「韓粉」310日冒雨趕到紐英崙中華公所,討論如何歡迎這位國民黨「明星」政客,全都興奮非常。
馬來西亞華僑謝如鍵坦言自己是「韓粉」。(張雨坤攝)
發起舉辦歡迎僑宴的全美台灣同鄉聯誼會會長馬滌凡說,韓國瑜的訪美首站是波士頓,他預定411日早上抵達,先到哈佛大學參加非公開會議。他們計畫當晚6點在波士頓華埠的帝苑大酒樓(Emperor Garden)舉辦歡迎晚宴。
香港華僑黃周麗桃說她妹妹是韓國逾的粉絲。(張雨坤攝)
馬滌凡說,宴會票價還沒確定,但可能會按照座位的不同分為706050美元。他們計畫安排韓國瑜和參加宴會的每一桌各拍一張合照,並在飯後演講,回答提問。
華僑劉泰國認為韓國瑜能改變和拯救台灣未來,
2020應參選總統
(張雨坤攝)
                許多參加籌備會的人都是「韓粉」。
馬來西亞華僑謝如鍵說,他自從2016年看了韓國瑜與王世堅的辯論後就變成了「韓粉」。「我覺得他的處事方式很平民化,沒有官架子……當我聽說他要來波士頓,我第一個打電話問:‘他幾時來?我一定要參與。」
來自香港的華僑黃周麗桃 (Judy)說自己的妹妹是「標準韓粉」,聽韓國瑜講話有時被感動到哭,有時也被逗到大笑。「去年我們在台灣的時候正好在選舉,所以我妹妹每天看電視,晚上也不睡覺。選舉那天她看了整個晚上,一早六點打電話來跟我報告,所以我這個一竅不通的人都能認識(韓國瑜)。」
不少人提到希望韓國瑜能參與2020年的總統競選。
華僑貝克寧建議大家去411日早上去機場歡迎韓國瑜。(張雨坤攝)
來波士頓已經二十多年的貝克寧說自己也是「標準韓粉」,還飛去高雄看了韓國瑜的就職典禮。貝克寧說韓國瑜是「非典型的國民黨政治家」和「不一樣的市長」,也是他認為競選總統最好的人選。
華僑劉泰國說,來波士頓三十九年,他對台灣的態度從「feeling proud」到失望,再到最近的disgustingawful。「台灣這麼一塊淨土,這麼一塊光明自由的寶島,被政客污染糟蹋了……2020年的大選,非韓國瑜出來不可,你找不到第二個能改變和拯救台灣未來的人選了。」
波士頓國民黨常委張韻蘭說,韓國瑜還沒有確定會不會參選,她希望大家能多給他一點時間,因為「這不是一個容易的決定」。她也笑稱在座的人都是「台灣現在最大黨——討厭民進黨」的同志,並且呼籲與會者支持2020年的國民黨競選人。
那麼,411日當天,波士頓的華僑們要如何歡迎韓國瑜的到來呢?參加籌備會的人們提出了各種想法:有人說要在機場舉牌子迎接他,有人提議說做Facebook網頁,有人說穿藍色襯衫,也有人說可以定做支持他的T恤,有人提議唱軍歌,還有人說要現場籌款。
主持籌備會的馬賓嶠女士說,所有的建議都被登記了下來,未來可能還有第二次籌備會。
中華公所的主席陳家驊和波士頓榮光會理事長石家孝也出席了籌備會。

星期日, 3月 10, 2019

海外華裔青年英語服務營 3/15 截止報名

歐主任致贈禮品予3位分享經驗學員張銘珊(右二)
黃子豪(右一)、陳弘(左一),感謝他們用心準備
及精彩的分享。
     (Boston Orange) 2019「海外華裔青年英語服務營」將於315日截止報名,波士頓僑教中心日前舉辦說明會,邀三名過來人分享經驗。
去年返臺教英語的張銘珊、黃子豪、陳弘,藉由照片、影片,分享了他們的服務實戰經驗,包括當地氣候、生活起居環境、學生需求、該具備的教學技巧、最好隨身攜帶那些東西等
分配到雲林縣拯民國小張銘珊表示,參加英語服務營不但讓她成長,也教了她對生活要心存更多謙卑與感謝。
2018年返臺學員張銘珊、黃子豪、陳弘,透過服務照片
及影片,向今年欲申請者分享赴臺灣擔任英語教學志工
期間的教學心得
分配至彰化縣新港國中的陳弘,把他在台灣四個星期的見聞與心得,做成了影音視頻,上傳到Youtube,大方分享她從第一天報到開始,接著受訓,上課和環島旅行的點點滴滴。
僑教中心主任歐宏偉表示,青年學子回台灣教學,既可歷練,又能成長,機會難得,他鼓勵青年學子們及時把握。
2019年海外青年英語服務營訂629日至727日舉行,凡 11年級以上,年滿17歲至25歲青年均可報名參加。申請人須上網(http://teenage.ocac.gov.tw)完成線上報名,印出「網路登錄確認單」,連同其它報名表件於315日前寄(送)達波士頓華僑文教服務中心。活動簡章及報名表可至僑委會網站https://www.ocac.gov.tw/OCAC/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=2192下載亦可至文教中心索取,地址:90 Lincoln St, Newton Highlands;聯絡人陳小姐,電話:617-965-8801,電子信箱: ocacbostonedu@gmail.com


星期五, 3月 08, 2019

MAYOR WALSH UNVEILS NEW RESOURCE FOR PARENTS AT BOSTON CITY HALL

MAYOR WALSH UNVEILS NEW RESOURCE FOR PARENTS AT BOSTON CITY HALL 
A public lactation room has been installed on the third floor of Boston City Hall to support those breastfeeding
 

BOSTON - Friday, March 8, 2019 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh today celebrated the arrival of Boston's first-ever public lactation booth at Boston City Hall, creating a new resource and space for parents. The lactation room is located in the main lobby on the third floor of Boston City Hall, adjacent to the south elevators. This free, convenient resource is available for anyone at City Hall who is looking for privacy to breastfeed or pump during normal business hours.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, while over 80 percent of infants begin breastfeeding at birth, many parents are not able to reach their breastfeeding goals due to lack of adequate support. Providing an optional and accessible space for breastfeeding or pumping milk is a step toward supporting parents and families who visit Boston City Hall. Led by the Mayor's Office, this initiative was a joint effort among Property Management, the Digital team, the Mayor's Offices of Women's Advancement, New Urban Mechanics, and Strategic Partnerships.

"At Boston City Hall and throughout our city, we need to ensure there are resources and support for parents, and I'm proud this new resource will be available to all at City Hall," said Mayor Walsh. "We look forward to continuing our work supporting parents and children throughout Boston, building resource for those who are raising the next generation of Bostonians."

The lactation room, created by Mamava, a woman-owned business dedicated to transforming the culture of breastfeeding, is a self-contained, mobile room with comfortable benches, a fold-down table, and an electrical outlet for plugging in a breast pump. Visitors are welcome to breastfeed anywhere in City Hall; the lactation room is an additional option for those seeking privacy. To access the room, visitors can download the Mamava mobile app or go to the information desk in the main lobby.

"We're thrilled to support breastfeeding people at Boston City Hall," said Sascha Mayer, Co-founder and CEO of Mamava. "We believe that all caregivers deserve a clean, comfortable, and dignified place to use a breast pump or breastfeed distraction-free -- anywhere, anytime. Mamava pods provide flexibility for facilities and easy access."

Mayor Walsh debuted the lactation room during the International Women's Day commemoration held at Boston City Hall. The event featured remarks from former Boston Artist in Residence Nakia Hill, the City of Boston's Poet Laureate Porsha Olayiwola, the City of Boston's women's employee resource group liaison Ann Carbone, and Christine Dodson, Chief Operating Officer at Mamava.

"As a working mother, I can relate to the many challenges parents face when caring for a new child," said Tania Del Rio, Executive Director of Women's Advancement. "For breastfeeding people, especially those who prefer feeding their baby or pumping in a private space, the lactation room can provide a much needed respite. I am proud of the diverse team at City Hall that made this happen."

This space continues the work of the Mayor's Office of Women's Advancement, whose work includes research on paid parental leave and childcare affordability; a multi-pronged approach to closing the gender wage gap; reducing the demand for sex trafficking in the City of Boston; and creating specific programming for women entrepreneurs.

Warren Unveils Proposal to Break Up Big Tech

Warren Unveils Proposal to Break Up Big Tech

Read Medium post here

Long Island City, NY - Today, Elizabeth Warren announced a tech reform proposal to ensure that today’s tech giants do not crowd out potential competitors, smother the next generation of great tech companies, and wield so much power that they can undermine our democracy.

Read more about Warren’s proposal here and below:

Breaking Up Big Tech
By Elizabeth Warren

Twenty-five years ago, Facebook, Google, and Amazon didn’t exist. Now they are among the most valuable and well-known companies in the world. It’s a great story – but also one that highlights why the government must break up monopolies and promote competitive markets.

In the 1990s, Microsoft – the tech giant of its time – was trying to parlay its dominance in computer operating systems into dominance in the new area of web browsing. The federal government sued Microsoft for violating anti-monopoly laws and eventually reached a settlement. The government’s antitrust case against Microsoft helped clear a path for Internet companies like Google and Facebook to emerge.

The story demonstrates why promoting competition is so important: it allows new, groundbreaking companies to grow and thrive -- which pushes everyone in the marketplace to offer better products and services. Aren’t we all glad that now we have the option of using Google instead of being stuck with Bing?

Today’s big tech companies have too much power -- too much power over our economy, our society, and our democracy. They’ve bulldozed competition, used our private information for profit, and tilted the playing field against everyone else. And in the process, they have hurt small businesses and stifled innovation.

I want a government that makes sure everybody -- even the biggest and most powerful companies in America -- plays by the rules. And I want to make sure that the next generation of great American tech companies can flourish. To do that, we need to stop this generation of big tech companies from throwing around their political power to shape the rules in their favor and throwing around their economic power to snuff out or buy up every potential competitor.

That’s why my Administration will make big, structural changes to the tech sector to promote more competition—including breaking up Amazon, Facebook, and Google.

How the New Tech Monopolies Hurt Small Businesses and Innovation

America’s big tech companies provide valuable products but also wield enormous power over our digital lives. Nearly half of all e-commerce goes through Amazon. More than 70% of all Internet traffic goes through sites owned or operated by Google or Facebook.

As these companies have grown larger and more powerful, they have used their resources and control over the way we use the Internet to squash small businesses and innovation, and substitute their own financial interests for the broader interests of the American people. To restore the balance of power in our democracy, to promote competition, and to ensure that the next generation of technology innovation is as vibrant as the last, it’s time to break up our biggest tech companies.

America’s big tech companies have achieved their level of dominance in part based on two strategies: 
  • Using Mergers to Limit Competition. Facebook has purchased potential competitors Instagram and WhatsApp. Amazon has used its immense market power to force smaller competitors like Diapers.com to sell at a discounted rate. Google has snapped up the mapping company Waze and the ad company DoubleClick. Rather than blocking these transactions for their negative long-term effects on competition and innovation, government regulators have waved them through.
     
  • Using Proprietary Marketplaces to Limit Competition. Many big tech companies own a marketplace – where buyers and sellers transact – while also participating on the marketplace. This can create a conflict of interest that undermines competition. Amazon crushes small companies by copying the goods they sell on the Amazon Marketplace and then selling its own branded version. Google allegedly snuffed out a competing small search engine by demoting its content on its search algorithm, and it has favored its own restaurant ratings over those of Yelp
Weak antitrust enforcement has led to a dramatic reduction in competition and innovation in the tech sector. Venture capitalists are now hesitant to fund new startups to compete with these big tech companies because it’s so easy for the big companies to either snap up growing competitors or drive them out of business. The number of tech startups has slumped, there are fewer high-growth young firms typical of the tech industry, and first financing rounds for tech startups have declined 22% since 2012.

With fewer competitors entering the market, the big tech companies do not have to compete as aggressively in key areas like protecting our privacy. And some of these companies have grown so powerful that they can bully cities and states into showering them with massive taxpayer handouts in exchange for doing business, and can act -- in the words of Mark Zuckerberg -- “more like a government than a traditional company.”

We must ensure that today’s tech giants do not crowd out potential competitors, smother the next generation of great tech companies, and wield so much power that they can undermine our democracy.

Restoring Competition in the Tech Sector

America has a long tradition of breaking up companies when they have become too big and dominant -- even if they are generally providing good service at a reasonable price.

A century ago, in the Gilded Age, waves of mergers led to the creation of some of the biggest companies in American history -- from Standard Oil and JPMorgan to the railroads and AT&T. In response to the rise of these “trusts,” Republican and Democratic reformers pushed for antitrust laws to break up these conglomerations of power to ensure competition.

But where the value of the company came from its network, reformers recognized that ownership of a network and participating on the network caused a conflict of interest. Instead of nationalizing these industries -- as other countries did -- Americans in the Progressive Era decided to ensure that these networks would not abuse their power by charging higher prices, offering worse quality, reducing innovation, and favoring some over others. We required a structural separation between the network and other businesses, and also demanded that the network offer fair and non-discriminatory service.

In this tradition, my administration would restore competition to the tech sector by taking two major steps:

First, by passing legislation that requires large tech platforms to be designated as “Platform Utilities” and broken apart from any participant on that platform. 

Companies with an annual global revenue of $25 billion or more and that offer to the public an online marketplace, an exchange, or a platform for connecting third parties would be designated as “platform utilities.”

These companies would be prohibited from owning both the platform utility and any participants on that platform. Platform utilities would be required to meet a standard of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory dealing with users. Platform utilities would not be allowed to transfer or share data with third parties.

For smaller companies (those with annual global revenue of between $90 million and $25 billion), their platform utilities would be required to meet the same standard of fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory dealing with users, but would not be required to structurally separate from any participant on the platform.

To enforce these new requirements, federal regulators, State Attorneys General, or injured private parties would have the right to sue a platform utility to enjoin any conduct that violates these requirements, to disgorge any ill-gotten gains, and to be paid for losses and damages. A company found to violate these requirements would also have to pay a fine of 5 percent of annual revenue.

Amazon Marketplace, Google’s ad exchange, and Google Search would be platform utilities under this law. Therefore, Amazon Marketplace and Basics, and Google’s ad exchange and businesses on the exchange would be split apart. Google Search would have to be spun off as well.

Second, my administration would appoint regulators committed to reversing illegal and anti-competitive tech mergers. 

Current antitrust laws empower federal regulators to break up mergers that reduce competition. I will appoint regulators who are committed to using existing tools to unwind anti-competitive mergers, including: 
  • Amazon: Whole Foods; Zappos
     
  • Facebook: WhatsApp; Instagram
     
  • Google: Waze; Nest; DoubleClick
Unwinding these mergers will promote healthy competition in the market -- which will put pressure on big tech companies to be more responsive to user concerns, including about privacy.  

Protecting the Future of the Internet

So what would the Internet look like after all these reforms?

Here’s what won’t change: You’ll still be able to go on Google and search like you do today. You’ll still be able to go on Amazon and find 30 different coffee machines that you can get delivered to your house in two days. You’ll still be able to go on Facebook and see how your old friend from school is doing.

Here’s what will change: Small businesses would have a fair shot to sell their products on Amazon without the fear of Amazon pushing them out of business. Google couldn’t smother competitors by demoting their products on Google Search. Facebook would face real pressure from Instagram and WhatsApp to improve the user experience and protect our privacy. Tech entrepreneurs would have a fighting chance to compete against the tech giants.

Of course, my proposals today won’t solve every problem we have with our big tech companies.

We must give people more control over how their personal information is collected, shared, and sold—and do it in a way that doesn’t lock in massive competitive advantages for the companies that already have a ton of our data.

We must help America’s content creators—from local newspapers and national magazines to comedians and musicians — keep more of the value their content generates, rather than seeing it scooped up by companies like Google and Facebook.

And we must ensure that Russia — or any other foreign power — can’t use Facebook or any other form of social media to influence our elections.

Those are each tough problems, but the benefit of taking these steps to promote competition is that it allows us to make some progress on each of these important issues too. More competition means more options for consumers and content creators, and more pressure on companies like Facebook to address the glaring problems with their businesses.

Healthy competition can solve a lot of problems. The steps I’m proposing today will allow existing big tech companies to keep offering customer-friendly services, while promoting competition, stimulating innovation in the tech sector, and ensuring that America continues to lead the world in producing cutting-edge tech companies. It’s how we protect the future of the Internet.

波士頓華商會慶新春 市長、警長、政要紛到賀

波士頓華商會幹部與嘉賓合影。(華商會提供)
(Boston Orange) 波士頓華商會(CBA)36日晚在帝苑大酒樓筵開50多桌,邀得波士頓市長馬丁華殊(Martin Walsh)等逾8名政要,盛大慶祝已亥豬年新春,展望來年事業興旺,社區繁榮。
洪青體育會三頭瑞獅秀技藝。(華商會提供)
慶祝會由波士頓華商會共同會長蔡倩婷演唱美國國歌拉開序幕。洪清體育會三頭瑞獅採青獻桔,送上祝福後,政要,嘉賓一一致詞,華商會共同會長陳文棟匯報過去一年成績。
馬丁華殊感謝華商會為波士頓市的經濟繁榮做貢獻,重申波士頓市府重視可負擔住宅,將與華商會密切合作,協助更多小企業創辦,拓展,改善波士頓市府的一應服務。
波士頓華商會兩名會長陳文棟(右),蔡倩婷(左)和僑領
陳毓禮(中)代表華商會接受瑞獅祝福。(華商會提供)
當晚到會的州市議員包括麻州參議員賓加利(Joe Boncore),波士頓市不分區市議員吳弭(Michelle Wu),分區市議員愛德華費林Ed Flynn),以及羅柏姿(Edwards Roberts)。他們分別送出表揚狀給華商會,以及僑領陳毓禮。
波士頓市警察局局長葛羅斯(Willam G. Gross),社區警察副局長陳孔恩,A-1區警長梅志強(Ken Fong),波士頓市消防局局長Joseph Finn,消防局副局長黃瑞瑜,薩福克郡地方檢察官羅琳絲(Rachael Rollins)等人,也都應邀到會。
駐波士頓台北經濟文化辦事處有處長徐佑典,僑教中心主任歐宏偉也聯袂出席,獻上祝詞。
波士頓市長馬丁華殊(Martin Walsh)致詞。(華商會提供)
紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊當晚藉致詞機會,提醒社區,華埠為維護地方治安,當年費盡心思,力氣,才趕走了紅燈區,如果有大麻店在華埠旁開張,華埠治安將重新面對威脅。他指出,三月五日晚他才出席了天滿街(Tremont)235號要開大麻店的公聽會,有將近200人出席,中華公所也遞交了有700人簽名的反對信。但社區大眾必須提高警覺,繼續關注此事。陳家驊也直接要求當晚在座的波士頓市長馬丁華殊,在是否批准大麻店在華埠旁開張一事,慎重考慮,多聽居民意見。
在匯報過去一年活動時,華商會共同會長陳文棟表示,該會積極與政府互動,年初和邀得市長巡視華埠街道,了解尼倫街上路邊停車位,突然全部讓位給自行車道的情況,和市府交通局溝通後,已爭取回一些車位。
媒體視覺捐款15萬元,和華商會與接受捐款單位代表
合影。左起,梅少華,陳毓璇,陳家驊,陳文棟,
媒體視覺代表,陳毓哩,媒體視覺代表,梅伍銀寬,
波士頓市長馬丁華殊,梁Jean,蔡倩婷,陳文珊。
(華商會提供)
華商會也積極和社區互動,舉辦過一次有600多人參加的敬老茶會,冬至時分別到君子樓,康樂樓,南灣東座等多個老人屋,請耆英們享用湯圓。
陳文棟在致詞時,特地感謝媒體視覺(Media Vision)公司的社區福利捐款15萬元。他也說明該筆款項已由華商會轉發給多個社區僑團。

波士頓經文處處長徐佑典致詞。(華商會提供)
波士頓華商會在華埠並不是一個新組織,但自從陳文棟接掌會長職務,蔡倩婷加入成為共同會長,波士頓資格最老,最尊貴的兩大僑團,波士頓洪門致公堂,波士頓安良工商會的主席,全美總理,依序為余麗媖,梅少華,陳仕維也都是波士頓華商會理事,波士頓市長馬丁華殊也一連兩年親自出席該會新春慶祝會,該會聲勢持續上揚。
波士頓華商會和薩福克郡地方檢察官Rachael Rollins (左四)
 ,波士頓警察局副局長陳孔恩(右四)。左起,梅少華,蔡倩
婷,陳文棟,陳文珊,波士頓警察Michael,譚達兒。
(華商會提供)
三名波士頓市議員頒發表揚狀給華商會。左起,波士頓
市議員愛德華費林(Ed Flynn),波士頓華商會會長陳文棟
,波市議員吳弭(Michelle Wu),陳毓禮,波市議員羅伯姿
(Edwards Roberts),蔡倩婷。(華商會提供)
華商會理事韓幼文(左),林秀蘭(右)歡迎陳毓璇,
黃景佩夫婦到會。(華商會提供)
波士頓華商會與警界人士合影。
波士頓僑教中心主任歐宏偉(右)和紐英崙中華公所主席
陳家驊(左)。(華商會提供)

波士頓華商會理事與波士頓市長馬丁華殊合影。右起,
韓幼文,陳文棟,梅少華,譚達兒(左一)。
(華商會提供)
波士頓華商會幹部敬酒。(華商會提供)
波士頓華商會與波士頓警察局局長葛羅斯(William G.
 Gross,前右三)等人合影。(華商會提供)
阮鴻燦(右)扮財神,為出席者送財。(華商會提供)
麻州參議員賓加利(Joe Boncore,中)頒表揚狀,
華商會會長陳文棟(左),蔡倩婷(右)代表接受。
(華商會提供)
僑領陳毓禮應邀致詞。
慶祝會開場唱美國國歌。