網頁

星期四, 3月 14, 2019

Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association Endorses Baker-Polito Administration's Dangerousness Bill

Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association Endorses Baker-Polito Administration's Dangerousness Bill

BOSTON – Today, the Baker-Polito Administration is announcing that the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association (MCOPA) has endorsed the Baker-Polito Administration's recently filed An Act to Protect the Commonwealth from Dangerous Persons. The announcement was made after a meeting of MCOPA, attended by Lt. Governor Karyn Polito. ​​

"Lt. Governor Polito and I are grateful for MCOPA's support for the Administration's dangerousness legislation," said Governor Charlie Baker.  "This bill will give law enforcement and the courts additional tools needed to keep the Commonwealth's communities safe from dangerous individuals."

"We are pleased to have the support of MCOPA on this important bill," said Lt. Governor Karyn Polito. "Several recent cases have highlighted the need for action on this issue, and we look forward to working with the Legislature to pass this bill."

“On behalf of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, I would like to thank the Baker–Polito Administration for filing this important legislation," said Chief Russell Stevens, Hamilton Police and President of the Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association​. "Several months ago, the Mass Chiefs Joined with the rest of law enforcement in supporting this bill when it was filed last session, and we rise once again to advocate for this important legislation.  MCOPA applauds the tremendous steps this bill takes to protect the people of the Commonwealth, and we respectfully ask the Legislature to partner with the Mass Chiefs as they have done so successfully in the past to get this bill to the Governor’s desk.”

“A defendant’s past criminal history should absolutely be considered as a factor at any such dangerousness hearing rather than just the alleged crime that is currently before the court,” Chelsea Police Chief Brian Kyes. “It is essential that in conducting a proper risk analysis in order to determine whether the defendant is to be considered a potential danger to any victim, witness or to the public in general, that their past criminal history – especially as it pertains to previous convictions for violent crimes - is considered and weighed based on its relevancy pertaining to a demonstrated propensity to commit violence. This bill will rectify the existing gap that currently occurs during a dangerousness hearing.”

First filed on September 6th, 2018 and re-filed on January 15, 2019, the Administration's bill would expand the list of offenses that can provide grounds for a dangerousness hearing and close certain loopholes at the start and end of the criminal process that currently limit or prevent effective action to address legitimate safety concerns. 

The bill will also strengthen the ability of judges to enforce the conditions of pre-trial release by empowering police to detain people who they observe violating court-ordered release conditions; current law does not allow this, and instead requires a court to first issue a warrant.

Under this proposal, judges will be empowered to revoke a person’s release when the offender has violated a court-ordered condition, such as an order to stay away from a victim, or from a public playground. Current law requires an additional finding of dangerousness before release may be revoked.

The legislation also expands the list of offenses which can provide grounds for a dangerousness hearing including crimes of sexual abuse and crimes of threatened or potential violence. It also follows the long-standing federal model in including a defendant’s history of serious criminal convictions as grounds that may warrant a dangerousness hearing. Current law requires courts to focus only on the crime charged and ignore a defendant’s criminal history when determining whether the defendant may be the subject of this sort of hearing.

Additional provisions of this legislation:

  • Improves the system for notifying victims of crimes of abuse and other dangerous crimes when a defendant is going to be released by creating clear lines of responsibility among police, prosecutors and corrections personnel to notify victims about an offender’s imminent release from custody, and create a six-hour window for authorities to inform a victim before an offender is allowed to be released.
  • Creates a new felony offense for cutting off a court-ordered GPS device.
  • Requires that the courts develop a text message service to remind defendants of upcoming court dates, reducing the chance they will forget and have a warrant issued for their arrest.
  • Allows dangerousness hearings at any point during a criminal proceeding, rather than requiring a prosecutor to either seek a hearing immediately or forfeit that ability entirely, even if circumstances later arise indicating that the defendant poses a serious risk to the community.
  • Requires that the probation department, bail commissioners and bail magistrates notify authorities who can take remedial action when a person who is on pre-trial release commits a new offense anywhere in the Commonwealth or elsewhere.
  • Creates a level playing field for appeals of district court release decisions to the superior court by allowing appeals by prosecutors, in addition to defendants, and giving more deference to determinations made in the first instance by our district court judges.
  • Creates a task force to recommend adding information to criminal records so that prosecutors and judges can make more informed recommendations and decisions about conditions of release and possible detention on grounds of dangerousness.
  • The legislation also closes loopholes at the start and end of the criminal process that currently limit or prevent effective action to address legitimate safety concerns. It extends the requirement that police take the fingerprints of people arrested for felonies to all people arrested, regardless of the charge, to ensure that decisions about release can be made with knowledge of a person’s true identity and full criminal history. It also allows, for the first time, bail commissioners and bail magistrates to consider dangerousness in deciding whether to release an arrestee from a police station when court is out of session.

AG HEALEY JOINS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT CHALLENGING BORDER WALL DECLARATION

AG HEALEY JOINS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT CHALLENGING BORDER WALL DECLARATION
Twenty State Attorneys General Sue Trump Administration to Block Emergency Declaration and Senseless Border Wall

BOSTON – Attorney General Maura Healey today joined a coalition of 20 state attorneys general in a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s unlawful declaration of a national emergency as pretext to redirect federal dollars toward building a wall on the Mexican border.

The amended complaint filed today by the California Attorney General’s Office alleges that the Trump Administration’s emergency declaration is unconstitutional and unlawful. The states ask the court to block the declaration, the unauthorized construction of a border wall, and the illegal diversion of federal dollars slated for drug interdiction and military projects.     

“Declaring a national emergency to build a wall repeatedly rejected by Congress is an illegal power grab by President Trump and a violation of the constitutional separation of powers,” said AG Healey. “We have decided to join this lawsuit because the President’s declaration endangers critical law enforcement and military projects in Massachusetts that depend on federal funding.” 

The states contend that the Trump Administration’s actions exceed the power of the executive office, violate the U.S. Constitution and federal law, and would illegally and unconstitutionally divert federal funds appropriated by Congress for other purposes such as drug interdiction, military construction, military personnel, and law enforcement initiatives. In Massachusetts, losing counterdrug activities funding would seriously hamper the state’s efforts to combat the opioid crisis, which continues to harm Massachusetts residents and public health.

Funds put at risk by the President’s declaration include:

  • $965,000 that has not yet been received in fiscal year 2019 from the Department of Defense for counterdrug activities that would be used by the Massachusetts National Guard for investigative case analysis support, linguist services, transportation support, inter-agency training, and reconnaissance
  • $90 million appropriated by Congress for a new compound semiconductor facility and microelectronics integration facility at Hanscom Airforce Base’s Lincoln Laboratory.
  • $42.6 million appropriated by Congress for construction of a new hangar at Westover Airforce Base.
  • $8.9 million from the Department of Defense for fiscal year 2020 for a multi-purpose machine gun range for the Massachusetts National Guard.
  • Funding for the Massachusetts State Police and Massachusetts Port Authority from the Treasury Forfeiture Fund’s equitable sharing program, resources that supplement and enhance Massachusetts law enforcement agencies’ state-appropriated funding.

The attorneys general allege the Trump Administration has made up a “crisis” of unlawful southern border entries as pretext to justify redirecting congressionally-appropriated funds to pay to build a wall along the southern border after the President failed to get Congress or Mexico to pay for it.

The federal government’s own data does not support President Trump’s rhetoric, as the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s data has shown that unlawful southern border entries are at their lowest point in 20 years and illegal drugs are more likely to come through official ports of entry. There is no credible evidence to suggest that a border wall would decrease crime rates, and the Trump Administration itself has claimed that it is more difficult to illegally cross the southern border today than ever before.

Joining today’s lawsuit are the attorneys general from California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia and Wisconsin.

Mass. Officials and Young Advocates Announce Winner of Statewide Young Worker Safety Poster Contest

Mass. Officials and Young Advocates Announce Winner of Statewide Young Worker Safety Poster Contest
A Rockland teen’s poster chosen to raise awareness, stem young worker injuries on the job. Poster to be featured on MBTA vehicles.

BOSTON          With the latest state data showing that from 2011-2015, Massachusetts teens under the age of 18 required 1,379 emergency department (ED) visits for work-related injuries, teen safety advocates and state officials announced the winners of the 2019 statewide Safe Jobs for Youth poster contest today at the Massachusetts State House to raise awareness of the dangers young workers face as they enter into the labor force.

Elizabeth Trull (17), of Rockland, won first place, taking home a cash prize of $500.  Second place went to Oliver Leventhal (16) of Arlington, and third place went toEthan Dollarhide (16), of Fall River, taking home prizes of $300 and $100, respectively. Trull’s work will be displayed on MBTA vehicles later this spring. The winning poster can be viewed by visiting https://www.mass.gov/guides/2019-ma-safe-jobs-for-youth-poster-contest.

Over 200 teens participated in the contest, and 61 youth served as judges, including young workers from Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health’s (MassCOSH) Teens Lead @ Work program.

According to the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, there were nearly two ED visits by teens for every 100 full-time teen workers, a rate 42% higher than adult workers above the age of 25. Four industries accounted for more than 70% of work-related teen injuries to teens. These industries include Accommodations and Food Service, Retail, Health Care and Social Assistance, and Construction.

“The best part of this poster contest was being able to spread a message to teens like me, who usually don’t have a platform like this,” said Trull. “Safety is too important to ignore.”

Congratulations to all those that participated and won the competition,” saidTrent Jordan, (18) a MassCOSH youth peer leader who presented the awards at the event. “We hope that these posters not only enlighten, but empower the youth to understand and recognize hazards at work while advocating for safe jobs for youth.”

Poster contest finalists included Rachel Shaw (16) of Sandwich, Victoria C. Rodriguez (15) of Berkley, Ethan Masters (15) of Arlington, Jonathan Young (17) of Eastham, Hannah Chace (17) of Fall River, Kaitlyn Gorton (17) of Seekonk, and Audrey Bronson (18) of Southampton. 

The contest was sponsored by MassCOSH and an interagency working group, The Massachusetts Youth Employment and Safety (YES) Team, which includes Commonwealth Corporation; the MA Office of the Attorney General; the MA Department of Elementary and Secondary Education; the MA Department of Industrial Accidents; the MA Department of Public Health; the MA Department of Labor Standards; the U.S. Department of Labor, Wage and Hour Division; the U.S. Department of Labor; and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

星期二, 3月 12, 2019

ARRESTS MADE IN NATIONWIDE COLLEGE ADMISSIONS SCAM

ARRESTS MADE IN NATIONWIDE COLLEGE ADMISSIONS SCAM:
ALLEGED EXAM CHEATING & ATHLETIC RECRUITMENT SCHEME
Defendants include CEOs, actresses, university athletic coaches, and college exam administrators

BOSTON – Dozens of individuals involved in a nationwide conspiracy that facilitated cheating on college entrance exams and the admission of students to elite universities as purported athletic recruits were arrested by federal agents in multiple states this morning and charged in federal court in Boston. Athletic coaches from Yale, Stanford, USC, Wake Forest and Georgetown, among others, are implicated, as well as parents and exam administrators. 

William “Rick” Singer, 58, of Newport Beach, Calif., was charged with racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy and obstruction of justice. Singer owned and operated the Edge College & Career Network LLC (“The Key”) – a for-profit college counseling and preparation business – and served as the CEO of the Key Worldwide Foundation (KWF) – a non-profit corporation that he established as a purported charity.

Between approximately 2011 and February 2019, Singer allegedly conspired with dozens of parents, athletic coaches, a university athletics administrator, and others, to use bribery and other forms of fraud to secure the admission of students to colleges and universities including Yale University, Georgetown University, Stanford University, the University of Southern California, and Wake Forest University, among others. Also charged for their involvement in the scheme are 33 parents and 13 coaches and associates of Singer’s businesses, including two SAT and ACT test administrators. 

Also charged is John Vandemoer, the head sailing coach at Stanford University, Rudolph “Rudy” Meredith, the former head soccer coach at Yale University, and Mark Riddell, a counselor at a private school in Bradenton, Fla. 

The conspiracy involved 1) bribing SAT and ACT exam administrators to allow a test taker, typically Riddell, to secretly take college entrance exams in place of students or to correct the students’ answers after they had taken the exam; 2) bribing university athletic coaches and administrators—including coaches at Yale, Stanford, Georgetown, the University of Southern California, and the University of Texas—to facilitate the admission of students to elite universities under the guise of being recruited as athletes; and (3) using the façade of Singer’s charitable organization to conceal the nature and source of the bribes.  


1)      College Entrance Exam Cheating Scheme
According to the charging documents, Singer facilitated cheating on the SAT and ACT exams for his clients by instructing them to seek extended time for their children on college entrance exams, which included having the children purport to have learning disabilities in order to obtain the required medical documentation. Once the extended time was granted, Singer allegedly instructed the clients to change the location of the exams to one of two test centers: a public high school in Houston, Texas, or a private college preparatory school in West Hollywood, Calif. At those test centers, Singer had established relationships with test administrators Niki Williams and Igor Dvorskiy, respectively, who accepted bribes of as much as $10,000 per test in order to facilitate the cheating scheme. Specifically, Williams and Dvorskiy allowed a third individual, typically Riddell, to take the exams in place of the students, to give the students the correct answers during the exams, or to correct the students’ answers after they completed the exams. Singer typically paid Ridell $10,000 for each student’s test. Singer’s clients paid him between $15,000 and $75,000 per test, with the payments structured as purported donations to the KWF charity. In many instances, the students taking the exams were unaware that their parents had arranged for the cheating.

2)      College Recruitment Scheme
It is further alleged that throughout the conspiracy, parents paid Singer approximately $25 million to bribe coaches and university administrators to designate their children as purported athletic recruits, thereby facilitating the children’s’ admission to those universities. Singer allegedly described the scheme to his customers as a “side door,” in which the parents paid Singer under the guise of charitable donations to KWF. In turn, Singer funneled those payments to programs controlled by the athletic coaches, who then designated the children as recruited athletes – regardless of their athletic experience and abilities. Singer also made bribe payments to most of the coaches personally.

For example, during a call with one parent, Singer stated: “Okay, so, who we are…what we do is we help the wealthiest families in the U.S. get their kids into school…My families want a guarantee. So, if you said to me ‘here’s our grades, here’s our scores, here’s our ability, and we want to go to X school’ and you give me one or two schools, and then I’ll go after those schools and try to get a guarantee done.” 

As part of the scheme, Singer directed employees of The Key and the KWF to create falsified athletic “profiles” for students, which were then submitted to the universities in support of the students’ applications. The profiles included fake honors that the students purportedly received and elite teams that they purportedly played on.  In some instances, parents supplied Singer with staged photos of their children engaged in athletic activity – such as using a rowing machine or purportedly playing water polo.

3)      Tax Fraud Conspiracy
Beginning around 2013, Singer allegedly agreed with certain clients to disguise bribe payments as charitable contributions to the KWF, thereby enabling clients to deduct the bribes from their federal income taxes. Specifically, Singer allegedly instructed clients to make payments to the KWF in return for facilitating their children’s admission to a chosen university. Singer used a portion of that money to bribe university athletic coaches to designate the children as student athletes. Thereafter, Masera or another KWF employee mailed letters from the KWF to the clients expressing thanks for their purported charitable contributions. The letter stated: “Your generosity will allow us to move forward with our plans to provide educational and self-enrichment programs to disadvantaged youth,” and falsely indicated that “no good or services were exchanged” for the donations. Many clients then filed personal tax returns that falsely reported the payment to the KWF as charitable donations.

            The charge of racketeering conspiracy provides for a sentence of no greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, a fine of $250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater and restitution. The charge of conspiracy to commit money laundering provides for a sentence of up to 20 years in prison, up to three years of supervised release, and a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the money laundering. The charge of conspiracy to defraud the United States provides for a sentence of no greater than five years in prison, up to three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charge of obstruction of justice provides for a sentence of no greater than 10 years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000. The charges of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud, and of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services wire fraud, provide for a sentence of no greater than 20 years in prison, three years of supervised release, and a fine of 250,000 or twice the gross gain or loss, whichever is greater. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

            United States Attorney Andrew E. Lelling; Joseph R. Bonavolonta, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Field Division; and Kristina O’Connell, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigations in Boston, made the announcement today. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Eric S. Rosen, Justin D. O’Connell, Leslie Wright, and Kristen A. Kearney of Lelling’s Securities and Financial Fraud Unit are prosecuting the case.

            The details contained in the charging documents are allegations. The defendants are presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

###
Appendix

1.      William Rick Singer, 58, of Newport Beach, Calif., owner of the Edge College & Career Network and CEO of the Key Worldwide Foundation, was charged in an Information with racketeering conspiracy, money laundering conspiracy, conspiracy to defraud the United States, and obstruction of justice.  He is scheduled to plead guilty in Boston before U.S. District Court Judge Rya W. Zobel on March 12, 2019, at 2:30 p.m.;
2.      Mark Riddell, 36, of Palmetto, Fla., was charged in an Information with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud as well as conspiracy to commit money laundering;
3.      Rudolph “Rudy” Meredith, 51, of Madison, Conn., the former head women’s soccer coach at Yale University, was charged in an Information with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and honest services wire fraud as well as honest services wire fraud; 
4.      John Vandemoer, 41, of Stanford, Calif., the former sailing coach at Stanford University, was charged in an Information with racketeering conspiracy and is expected to plead guilty in Boston before U.S. District Court Judge Rya W. Zobel on March 12, 2019, at 3:00 p.m.;
5.      David Sidoo, 59, of Vancouver, Canada, was charged in an indictment with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud. Sidoo was arrested on Friday, March 8th in San Jose, Calif., and appeared in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California yesterday. A date for his initial appearance in federal court in Boston has not yet been scheduled. 
The following defendants were charged in an indictment with racketeering conspiracy:

6.      Igor Dvorskiy, 52, of Sherman Oaks, Calif., director of a private elementary and high school in Los Angeles and a test administrator for the College Board and ACT;
7.      Gordon Ernst, 52, of Chevy Chase, Md., former head coach of men and women’s tennis at Georgetown University;
8.      William Ferguson, 48, of Winston-Salem, N.C., former women’s volleyball coach at Wake Forest University;
9.      Martin Fox, 62, of Houston, Texas, president of a private tennis academy in Houston;
10.  Donna Heinel, 57, of Long Beach, Calif., the senior associate athletic director at the University of Southern California;
11.  Laura Janke, 36, of North Hollywood, Calif., former assistant coach of women’s soccer at the University of Southern California;
12.  Ali Khoroshahin, 49, of Fountain Valley, Calif., former head coach of women’s soccer at the University of Southern California;
13.  Steven Masera, 69, of Folsom, Calif., accountant and financial officer for the Edge College & Career Network and the Key Worldwide Foundation;
14.  Jorge Salcedo, 46, of Los Angeles, Calif., former head coach of men’s soccer at the University of California at Los Angeles;
15.  Mikaela Sanford, 32, of Folsom, Calif., employee of the Edge College & Career Network and the Key Worldwide Foundation;
16.  Jovan Vavic, 57, of Rancho Palos Verdes, Calif., former water polo coach at the University of Southern California; and
17.  Niki Williams, 44, of Houston, Texas, assistant teacher at a Houston high school and test administrator for the College Board and ACT.
The following defendant was charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud:

18.  Michael Center, 54, of Austin Texas, head coach of men’s tennis at the University of Texas at Austin
The following defendants were charged in a criminal complaint with conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud:

19.  Gregory Abbott, 68, of New York, N.Y., the founder and chairman of a food and beverage packaging company;
20.  Marcia Abbott, 59, of New York, N.Y.;
21.  Gamal Abdelaziz, 62, of Las Vegas, Nev., the former senior executive of a resort and casino operator in Macau, China;
22.  Diane Blake, 55, of San Francisco, Calif., an executive at a retail merchandising firm;
23.  Todd Blake, 53, of San Francisco, Calif., an entrepreneur and investor;
24.  Jane Buckingham, 50, of Beverly Hills, Calif., the CEO of a boutique marketing company;
25.  Gordon Caplan, 52, of Greenwich, Conn., co-chairman of an international law firm based in New York City;
26.  I-Hin “Joey” Chen, 64, of Newport Beach, Calif., operates a provider of warehousing and related services for the shipping industry;
27.  Amy Colburn, 59, of Palo Alto, Calif.;
28.  Gregory Colburn, 61, of Palo Alto, Calif.;
29.  Robert Flaxman, 62, of Laguna Beach, Calif., founder and CEO of real estate development firm;
30.  Mossimo Giannulli, 55, of Los Angeles, Calif., fashion designer;
31.  Elizabeth Henriquez, 56, of Atherton, Calif.;
32.  Manuel Henriquez, 55, of Atherton, Calif., founder, chairman and CEO of a publicly traded specialty finance company;
33.  Douglas Hodge, 61, of Laguna Beach, Calif., former CEO of investment management company;
34.  Felicity Huffman, 56, of Los Angeles, Calif., an actress;
35.  Agustin Huneeus Jr., 53, of San Francisco, Calif., owner of wine vineyards;
36.  Bruce Isackson, 61, of Hillsborough, Calif., president of a real estate development firm;
37.  Davina Isackson, 55, of Hillsborough, Calif.;
38.  Michelle Janavs, 48, of Newport Coast, Calif., former executive of a large food manufacturer; 
39.  Elisabeth Kimmel, 54, of Las Vegas, Nev., owner and president of a media company;
40.  Marjorie Klapper, 50, of Menlo Park, Calif., co-owner of jewelry business;
41.  Lori Loughlin, 54, of Los Angeles, Calif., an actress;
42.  Toby MacFarlane, 56, of Del Mar, Calif., former senior executive at a title insurance company;
43.  William McGlashan Jr., 55, of Mill Valley, Calif., senior executive at a global equity firm;
44.  Marci Palatella, 63, of Healdsburg, Calif., CEO of a liquor distribution company;
45.  Peter Jan Sartorio, 53, of Menlo Park, Calif., packaged food entrepreneur;
46.  Stephen Semprevivo, 53, of Los Angeles, Calif., executive at privately held provider of outsourced sales teams;
47.  Devin Sloane, 53, of Los Angeles, Calif., founder and CEO of provider of drinking and wastewater systems;
48.  John Wilson, 59, of Hyannis Port, Mass., founder and CEO of private equity and real estate development firm;
49.  Homayoun Zadeh, 57, of Calabasas, Calif., an associate professor of dentistry; and
50.  Robert Zangrillo, 52, of Miami, Fla., founder and CEO of private investment firm.