網頁

星期四, 8月 02, 2018

中華書法會辦正體漢字文化節 劉裕鵬闡述書法可養生

中華書法會在紐英崙中華公所會議廳舉辦"正體漢字文化節"講座。(周菊子攝)

中華書法會會長林卓培(左起),駐波士頓經文處處長徐佑典,
書法家劉裕鵬,紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊,中華書法會共同
會長黃周麗桃,波士頓僑教中心主任歐宏偉。(周菊子攝)
             (Boston Orange 周菊子波士頓報導)波士頓中華書法會和紐英崙中華公所合作,728日在中華公所會議廳舉辦波士頓地區正體漢字文化節系列活動,邀書法家劉裕鵬以書法養生,寓康於樂為主題,分享練書法可養生理論。
             去年,劉裕鵬談的是正體字對中文發展的重要性,今年則以養生為主題,提醒眾人,其實練字,寫書法,不但可發揚中華傳統文化,還能延年益壽。活動當天在場的波士頓著名書法家吳紹營已年逾90,有如實證。
經文處處長徐佑典謙稱自己書法不行。左為中華書法會會長黃周麗桃。
(周菊子攝)
             網路上的一個健康網也稱,從漢朝以迄,無論古今,書法家的壽命平均都有8088歲。例如唐代的柳公權87歲,青末到民國齊白石90以上。
             當天的講座由中華書法會會長黃周麗桃主持,先請嘉賓們致詞。另一名會長林卓培擺出以毛筆寫就的般若波羅蜜多心經
             駐波士頓經濟文化辦事處處長徐佑典謙稱自己舉起毛筆,就覺得吃立,很佩服那些能夠人字合一,揮灑自如寫毛筆字的人。
紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊期盼中華文化可藉書法傳揚。(周菊子攝)
            紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊開玩笑說,當年的毛筆字功課,都是女朋友代勞,看到活動主題為正體字,覺得感動,因為正即正宗,簡體字把中文簡化到讓人不知所云,實在令人唏噓,希望中華書法會能多辦這類活動,發揚中華文化傳統。
            波士頓僑教中心主任歐宏偉也強調,傳統中文應稱為正體字,只為和簡體字區別,就說繁體字,那是誤導。他也藉機感謝吳紹營等中華書法會成員的一向支持僑教中心。
             劉裕鵬指出,書法已被醫學界認定為養生的首要方法,揮寫不同字體,有不同作用。他還發給出席者每人一份圖文並茂的說明,簡述草棣楷行等四種字體,以及繪畫的劃出梅蘭竹菊松,各有什麼養生功效。
               例如楷書是工整字體,可調節人的心理狀態,舒緩焦慮,緊張,有冠心病,高血壓的人不妨多寫楷書。
波士頓僑教中心主任強調傳統中文是正體字。(周菊子攝)
               棣書筆畫沉重穩健,能穩定人的情緒,讓人氣血平和,也對高血壓,冠心病患者有好處,甚至能改善人的頭痛,失眠症狀。
               行書強調的是輕鬆自如,可帶動人的靈活性與應變能力,抒發心情          對患抑鬱症,有強烈自卑感,手腳麻痺,患腦血栓的人都有幫助。
            草書比起行書,是更放縱的字體,有風起雲捲,大起大落的氣勢,適合感到精神壓抑的人,藉以抒發。
書法家劉裕鵬表示書畫同源,都有養生功效。(周菊子攝)
             畫梅,因梅屬木,五臟屬肝,可煥發生機,調理內臟機能。畫蘭,則蘭屬火,五臟屬新,可令人心曠神怡,精神振奮。畫竹,竹屬木,五臟中屬肝,可排胸中怒氣,養肝護臟。畫菊,則菊屬金,可助年高之人滋潤肺腑。畫松,則松屬土,臟屬脾,腑屬胃,可助人得到海納百川的胸襟。

             演講結束後,黃氏婦女部的養生太極學員們還協助分派糕點,讓出席者,又聽講座,又享美點,心情暢快。(圖片已於29日發表)




書法家吳紹營已高齡90,仍活躍社區。(周菊子攝)




中華書法會會長黃周麗桃說明劉裕鵬是她的書法老師。(周菊子攝)


會末大合影。(周菊子攝)

會場展示林卓培的書法作品。(周菊子攝)

會場展示林卓培的書法作品。(周菊子攝)

MAYOR WALSH ANNOUNCES NEXT STEPS TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICE WORN BODY CAMERAS, SHARES FINAL REPORT

MAYOR WALSH ANNOUNCES NEXT STEPS TOWARDS IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICE WORN BODY CAMERAS, SHARES FINAL REPORT
BOSTON - Thursday, August 2, 2018 - Building on his commitment to prioritizing public safety and continuing to build strong police-community relations, Mayor Martin J. Walsh, together with the Boston Police Department and in partnership with Dr. Anthony Braga and Dr. Jack McDevitt of Northeastern University, has released the final report on Boston's body-worn cameras pilot program. The overall findings of the report indicate the small, but meaningful benefits that the placement of body cameras have on encounters between residents and police officers. As a next step, the City of Boston plans to expand the body-worn camera program through a phased-in approach and the City is engaging in conversations with the police unions.

"Boston is a model city in our nation for having strong police-community relations, and our goal is to continue building trust and positive relationships between law enforcement officers and community members," said Mayor Walsh. "This study shows the potential value that body cameras can have as part of our overall strategy for strengthening ties between law enforcement and the residents they serve. I am proud that we will be moving forward on this, and look forward to seeing how this program will further support the transformative progress we have made in community policing."

"I'm proud of our officers for taking this pilot seriously and for continuing the hard work they do every day," said Police Commissioner William B. Evans. "The results from this study show there is positive impact in the use of the body cameras. While the numbers in Boston are low, there is always room for improvement. If using technology like body cameras can help further improve the way we police, I'm happy to see the City's commitment to full implementation."

"The Body Worn Camera Pilot process and study have been very important in understanding firsthand what members of the community believe will help the city move forward and how technology can play a role," said Boston Police Superintendent in Chief William Gross. "I look forward to the opportunity to lead our officers in adding this program to our community policing strategy and strengthening relationships across this city."

The findings indicate that body cameras generate small but meaningful benefits to police-citizen encounters, specifically in terms of officers receiving fewer complaints (approximately one fewer complaint per month), and fewer use of force reports (slightly less than one use of force report per month).

Importantly, in the years prior to the pilot program, citizen complaints and use of force reports have been decreasing. From 2013 to 2017, the number of complaints against officers decreased 46 percent, from 350 complaints in 2013 to 189 complaints in 2017. Additionally, use of force reports generated by BPD officers between 2013 and 2017 decreased by 52.3 percent, from 107 reports in 2014 to 51 use of force reports in 2017.

These declining numbers can be attributed to robust training in unconscious bias and de-escalation. BPD recruit classes have been participating in fair and impartial training since 2016 and an Effective Communication training since 2017. In 2016, the BPD Academy also provided in-service training on Police Response to Mental, De-Escalation, and Use of Force Review, as well as a department-wide E-learning course on Bias Free Policing.

"The findings of the randomized controlled trial suggest that the placement of body worn cameras on Boston Police officers generate small but meaningful benefits to the civility of police-citizen civilian encounters," said Dr. Anthony Braga, Northeastern University researcher. "The study finds that officers wearing cameras received fewer citizen complaints and generated fewer use of force reports relative to officers who did not wear cameras. The presence of the cameras seem to de-escalate the potential for confrontations between police and citizens."

In addition to quantitative data, the report also offers a descriptive analysis that includes perceptions of the body camera program from the perspective of officers, advocacy groups and members of the public. This analysis offered insight on the many different components involved in a body camera program, including overall attitude towards cameras, quality of police community interaction, improve investigations of police misconduct, privacy, training, review of video, quality of audio and video, use of video in officer training, dealing with individuals in crisis and use of video in court. As a result of the findings, the report suggests that:
  • A process should be developed to make the public aware of any implementation process;
  • A review process should be established to assure that videos exist in all appropriate cases, and that documentation exists in cases where a video was not recorded;
  • A formal process should be developed for transferal of videos from police to prosecutors, and from prosecutors to defense attorneys.
"I'm grateful to BPD and Northeastern for thoroughly reviewing the pilot program, and to the Mayor for committing money to implement a permanent body camera program, a technology that not only serves our officers but also the community, and has real potential to build more trust between the two," said City Council President Andrea Campbell.

Based on preliminary analysis of the pilot program, Mayor Walsh proactively included a $2 million investment in this year's budget for the adoption of police-worn body cameras, covering start-up costs and the purchase of up to 400 cameras. This builds off the initial $500,000 set aside in FY18 for the body camera pilot program. Program costs for the first three years are estimated at $8.5 million, with annual recurring costs after FY21 estimated at $3.3 million, however final costs will be dependent on several factors and are subject to change.

Building on the BPD's commitment to transparency and strengthening the relationship and level of trust between officers and community members, 100 officers participated in a year-long body-worn camera pilot program that concluded this past September. As part of the one-year pilot program, BPD officers outfitted with body cameras generated roughly 38,200 videos that covered more than 4,600 hours of police work in Boston neighborhoods.

Mayor Walsh, Commissioner Evans and members of the Boston Police Department have shown a way forward in police-community relations with part one crime falling by 18%, and arrests being down 23%. In addition to appointing the most diverse police leadership in Boston's history, Mayor Walsh has committed to building a diverse talent pipeline for Boston Police by reinstituting the cadet program to train and recruit candidates from all backgrounds for the police academy.

As a way to further strengthen police-community relations, in June 2017, Mayor Walsh announced reforms to the Community Ombudsman Oversight Panel (CO-OP Board) and Complaint Mediation Program to provide a neutral location for the public to file complaints (Civic Engagement Cabinet). These reforms have led to an increase in the number of cases reviewed (from 10 percent to 20 percent) and automatically refer cases for immediate review that involve allegations of discrimination or use of force resulting in serious bodily injury.

星期三, 8月 01, 2018

WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PAYS $121,000 FOR FAILING TO PROPERLY PAY WORKERS ON MEDFORD PUBLIC PROJECT

WINCHESTER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY PAYS $121,000 FOR FAILING TO PROPERLY PAY WORKERS ON MEDFORD PUBLIC PROJECT
Company and its Owners Barred from Public Construction for 10 Years

BOSTON – A Winchester construction company has paid more than $121,000 in wages and penalties for violating the Massachusetts prevailing and minimum wage laws by failing to properly pay workers on a Medford public works project, Attorney General Maura Healey announced today.
            “This company and its owners gained an unfair advantage by cheating their workers out of the wages they earned,” said AG Healey. “With this settlement, we are sending a message that there are serious consequences to breaking our laws.”
When our state invests in public works projects, we expect the companies working on them to pay their employees fairly,” said AG Healey. “We will take action against companies that violate the law and cheat workers out of wages they are owed.”
J. Donlon and Sons Inc., owner Joseph M. Donlon Sr., and his two sons, Joseph M. Donlon Jr. and Sean Donlon, were cited for intentionally failing to pay prevailing wage, failing to submit true and accurate certified payroll records, failing to pay the state minimum wage and failing to maintain true and accurate general payroll records from January 2012 through December 2016. As part of the settlement, the company and all three corporate officers are prohibited from bidding or working on any public works construction project in Massachusetts for 10 years.
The AG’s Fair Labor Division began investigating J. Donlon and Sons after a former employee submitted a complaint alleging he was not paid the proper prevailing wage rate for work performed on a City of Medford utility trench patching public works project. The AG’s Office determined that employees on the project were paid far less than the established prevailing wage rate. During one three-year period, for example, employees were paid an hourly rate of between $8 and $20 when they should have been paid between $51.35 and $54.10 per hour.
The company also submitted certified payroll records to the City of Medford during certain years that listed only members of the Donlon family as having worked on the project and omitted other employees. The investigation found that general payroll records were also inaccurate, and two employees were paid less than the applicable minimum wage. 
J. Donlon and Sons Inc., which was awarded the City of Medford utility trench patching contract for 12 consecutive years from 2004 to 2016, has previously been cited for violating the state’s prevailing wage laws while working on this project. In 2006, the company and Joseph M. Donlon Sr. were issued two intentional citations for failing to pay the prevailing wage and failing to submit true and accurate certified payroll records
The AG’s Office has prioritized wage theft in the construction industry. In fiscal year 2018, the AG’s Fair Labor Division issued 97 citations against 45 employers in the construction industry for a total of nearly $1.1 million in assessed restitution and penalties impacting more than 331 workers.

Under the Massachusetts Prevailing Wage Law, contractors and subcontractors engaged in public construction projects must pay their employees a special minimum wage. The required wage rate is based on the occupational classification for the type of work the employees perform.

AG Healey’s Fair Labor Division is responsible for enforcing state laws regulating the payment of wages, including prevailing wage, minimum wage, earned sick time and overtime laws.
Workers who believe that their rights have been violated in their workplace are encouraged to file a complaint at www.mass.gov/ago/wagetheftFor information about the state’s wage and hour laws, workers may call the Office’s Fair Labor Hotline at (617) 727-3465 or go to the Attorney General’s new Workplace Rights website www.mass.gov/ago/fairlabor for materials in multiple languages.
This matter was handled by Assistant Attorney General Barbara Dillon DeSouza and Inspector Brian Davies, both of AG Healey’s Fair Labor Division.

紐英崙中華公所將甄聘行政主任 研議成立常務董事會

紐英崙中華公所五名職員主持會議,右起雷國輝,朱蘇珊,陳家驊,
陳文浩,周樹昂。(周菊子攝)
             (Boston Orange 周菊子波士頓報導) 紐英崙中華公所目前坐擁資產2600多萬元,一旦三大土地發展案順利推動,勢必更富。公所主席陳家驊在731日的本年度第四次董事大會中,動議聘行政主任,討論組成15人常務董事會,以期未來專業管理,確保長期造福社區。
紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊說明喜露街50號未來發展計劃。(周菊子攝)
                 紐英崙中華公所財政陳文浩在董事大會中提交的財務報告顯示,在中華公所的現有資產中,流動資產約350萬元,不動產包括價值約143萬元的樓宇,以及約值1,034餘萬元的土地,價值大約1700萬元。一旦中華公所順利推動喜露街50號,大同村南停車場,泰勒街78號等在籌備,研議中的土地發展案,蓋出數百戶住宅單位,中華公所擁有的資產額度將更驚人。     
             陳家驊在主席報告時指出,無論是經辦土地發展案,或管理未來的龐大物業,以中華公所現有義務職,兼職員工的人力,物力,恐怕都無法勝任。要有效率的妥善經營,最好能聘請具專業能力的專職人員,估計支出為年薪十萬元,另加約等值30%的各項福利。這筆費用應可來自土地發展案的發展費。
紐英崙中華公所中文書記雷國輝(右),英文書記朱蘇珊(左)。(周菊子攝)
            此案在會議上由黃國威提案,余麗媖、蔣宗壬附議,將交由中華公所財務小組,物業小組成立聯合委員會,承辦草擬職稱,職務說明,招聘,面試等事宜,再於九月份第五次董事大會中提出推薦人選,交由董事大會做最後決定。
               紐英崙中華公所是個非牟利機構,共有5名職員,41名董事。目前每二個月召開一次全員出席的董事大會,一年至少開會六次。
紐英崙中華公所財政陳文浩。(周菊子攝)
                物業小組召集人,也是中華公所英文書記朱蘇珊在匯報喜露街50號發展案時說明,中華公所與戴維斯公司,波士頓華人佈道會合作申請的”指定計畫區域(PDA)”,已初步獲得波士頓鄰里發展局支持,預定九月份由區域劃分(zoning)委員會審批,再交給市長簽署定案。屆時中華公所可蓋高150呎,分14層樓的最多313個單位,若包括戴維斯公司放進中華公所發展案中的額度,中華公所建造的喜露街50號大樓,估計有39%能夠劃歸可負擔住宅。
喜露街50號和戴維斯公司,波士頓華人佈道會的發展計劃預定地
彼此相連。(周菊子攝)
中華公所主席陳家驊指出,由於大同村南停車場發展案已有亞美社區發展協會(ACDC),榮氏公司(Winn),畢肯(Beacon)等三家公司競標,籌備工作等於已經開展,中華公所又有機會在波士頓市政府支持下,取得泰勒街78號的發展權,這些發展案湊在一起,不但工作量驚人,會讓中華公所需要聘請專人承辦,還會有許多事務需要中華公所董事會更有效率的討論,做決定。以中華公所有董事46名,二個月才開一次會的現實,恐怕無法因應。
選舉小組召集人,也是中華公所中文書記雷國輝在會上報告,該小組在六月廿六日,七月三日都開過會,提出是否成立一個15人的常務董事會,其中5席為中華公所職員,另外10席,敦請出席中華公所代表人數多於一人的安良工商會,至孝篤親公所,黃氏宗親會,李氏公所,余風采棠等僑團,各指派一名代表進入常務董事會,其餘5個席位由董事大會從其他僑團中推選。這常務董事會將每月開會,必要時再開特別會議。非常務董事會的董事們,就改為半年或一季開一次會。
三機構預定發展地點的示意圖。(周菊子攝)
選舉小組還將討論修改章程,討論以後公所職員是否有權投票,職員席位是否可以連選連任,有無限制,執行辦法,中英文章程內是否應完全一致等議題。
中華公所還在這次的董事大會中通過了改聘朱汝聰(Adam Chu)為中華公所律師,修改羅燕玲的顧問合約內容,鑒於她的已為中華公所爭取到兩筆補助款,把付給她的顧問費,從12,000元提高為20,000元。中華公所也授權物業小組支出最多五萬元,翻修地板,修理或製作新黑板,油漆二,三樓數間教室的牆壁等。
紐英崙中華公所董事們開會。(周菊子攝)
中華公所預定821(週二)7點,召開特別會議,討論喜露街50號,以及大同村南停車場發展計劃。中華公所將於812日上午10點至下午5點,在華埠舉辦中秋節聯歡會。華埠社區議會將於87日下午3點,在大同舉辦 公園舉辦警民聯歡會(National Night Out)”。波士頓市長預定出席。
甄氏宗親會派馮甄若素做出席代表。(周菊子攝)
紐英崙中華公所董事大會現場。(周菊子攝)

波士頓華商會鼓勵耆英關注政治 陳毓禮憶舊事道感謝

前排左起,韓佑文,陳建立,余麗媖,陳家驊,Emily K. Shea,陳黃美蘭,單鳳琴,陳毓禮,林汝蘭,陳文棟,陳文珊,後排左起,卡普阿諾(Mike Capuano), Greg Henning,愛德華費林(Ed Flynn),麥家威(Aaron Michlewitz),徐丹晨,麻州州長查理貝克(Charlie Baker)。(周菊子攝)

近600耆英濟濟一堂。(周菊子攝)
右起,波士頓華商會會長陳文棟,麻州州長查理貝克(Charlie Baker),
陳文珊,陳文浩,聯邦眾議員卡普阿諾(Mike Capuano),余麗媖,
陳毓禮。(周菊子攝)
             (Boston Orange 周菊子波士頓報導) 波士頓華商會731日在帝苑大酒樓舉辦敬老感恩茶會,邀來麻州州長查理貝克(Charlie Baker),聯邦眾議員卡普阿諾(Mike Capuano)等不下七名政客,和將近600名耆英晤面,還在會上協助耆英登記成為選民,期許加強華埠影響力。
麻州眾議員麥家威(Aaron Michlewitz)(右一),陳文珊(前中)和青少年
義工們合影。(周菊子攝)
麻州州長查理貝克(Charlie Baker)展示四年前他拿到的幸運小紅包。
(周菊子攝)
               波士頓華商會會長陳文棟表示,辦這敬老感恩茶會,源於人稱法蘭克叔叔的陳毓禮,想要辦個飲早茶活動,感謝耆英們過去這麼多年來的支持。波士頓華商會接手承辦,則是希望藉此機會,讓耆英們了解波士頓華商會取之於社會,用之於社會,與居民攜手,繁榮華埠的宗旨與心願。他很感謝華商會會員和一群青年義工們分工合作,讓耆英們歡度一午。
               在茶會中,陳毓禮以台山話致詞,指出50年前,麻州政客沒人踏進波士頓華埠,50年後,想要順利當選的政客,卻幾乎沒人敢忽視華埠力量,這都要歸功於耆英們的支持與助力。
               陳毓禮還記得,1970年代,中華民國政府送給波士頓華埠蓋牌樓的建築材料,但華埠社團自己沒有足夠的錢,只好把材料暫存在倉庫裏。華埠人士拜見當年的波士頓市長懷特,希望政府支持,沒想到懷特第一句話問的是,華埠有多少張選票。
               陳毓禮,陳毓璇兩兄弟和波士頓耆英就結下了不解之緣,華埠居民的選票也從屈指可數,增加到300多張,然後增加到近年的大約1000多張(不包括南端(South End)。
               陳毓禮表示,波士頓華商會成立也有幾十年了,是華埠社區的重要組織,和華埠的經濟是否繁榮,有著不可分割關係,支持了許多服務機構的生存。他希望耆英們能積極參與政治,出席投票,也能夠支持華商會,支持中華公所,攜手促使波士頓華埠成為更美好社區。
陳毓禮(左)和聯邦眾議員卡普阿諾(Mike Capuano)。(周菊子攝)
               麻州州長查理貝克在陳建立做即席翻譯中,從西裝口袋中掏出一個小紅包,告訴在場耆英們,四年前在波士頓華埠中秋節聯歡會活動上,有人給了他這小紅包,告訴他,會給他帶來幸運。當選以後,他心懷感念,每天都把這小紅包帶在身邊。今年他競選連任,希望可以繼續得到幸運之神眷顧。
競選薩福克郡地方檢察官的Greg Henning(左)和波士頓市議員
愛德華費林(Ed Flynn)。(周菊子攝)
               查理貝克還說,他有三點要和耆英們分享,一是他要感謝耆英們對社區,社會的貢獻,二是他希望大家知道,樂齡會(America Association of Retired Persons,簡稱AARP)在全美國只挑選了兩個對年齡友善的州,在紐約州之外,就是麻州。他將和州、市議員合作,在麻州內建造更多對年齡友善的耆英住宅,以及可負擔住宅,要讓大家有更多機會在波士頓市自己的社區之內,居住,工作,玩耍。他期待在即將到來的華埠中秋節聯歡會上和大家再見面。
               聯邦眾議員卡普阿諾原本市尚莫維爾市市長,1999年迄今,擔任聯邦眾議員,今年也要競選連任。他在茶會中並未多說,但用中文唱了一首兩隻老虎跑得快的兒歌,博得台下一片掌聲。
               這天出席敬老感恩茶會的政要,還有麻州眾議員麥家威(Arron Michlewitz),波士頓市議員愛德華費林(Ed Flynn),波士頓市老人局局長Emily K. Shea,波士頓市政府亞裔聯絡員徐丹晨,競選薩福克郡地方檢察官的Greg Henning等人。
麻州眾議員麥家威(Aaron Michlewitz)。(周菊子攝)
           愛作詩的陳建立,為這茶會做了一首詩,華埠商會願創新,敬老茶會共感恩,州長官員來多謝,選舉投票為社群,白眼看人歷史真,牌樓興建智勇仁,三千六百多條票,有數可計勝金銀。(更新版)
右起,波士頓市亞裔聯絡員徐丹晨,波士頓市老人局局長Emily K. Shea,
紐英崙中華公所主席陳家驊。(周菊子攝)

星期二, 7月 31, 2018

Massachusetts Legislature Passes $2.4 Billion Environmental Bond Bill

Massachusetts Legislature Passes $2.4 Billion Environmental Bond Bill
BOSTON – Representative Ultrino joined his colleagues in the Legislature who voted today to pass a $2.4 Billion Environmental Bond Bill focused on improving climate change resiliency and adaptation; enhancing environmental and natural resource protection; and investing in parks and recreational assets.
The legislation passed today ensures that Massachusetts can continue to plan for global warming and a changing climate, including along our vulnerable coastlines.
“It is important to invest money and resources into preserving our environment which is why I was so happy to support this bill. The funds allocated in this legislation will help improve infrastructure, conservation efforts, and restoration programs” Says Representative Ultrino.
“Climate change is a real and present threat to Massachusetts, and we must treat it as a priority,” said Senate President Karen E. Spilka (D-Ashland). “These investments in our communities, coastlines, and in overall climate resiliency highlight our joint focus with the House on preparing Massachusetts’ infrastructure for the future, and safeguarding our residents from potential environmental disasters. I thank the conferees for their dedication to preparing this vital legislation.”
“These investments protect critical natural resources, preserve our parks and recreational areas and aim to make our Commonwealth is more resilient to the threats of climate change for years to come,” said House Speaker Robert A. DeLeo (D-Winthrop). “I’m proud to work with my colleagues in the House and Senate to fund these important initiatives.”
Among other spending, the bill appropriates:
  • $225,000,000 for community investment grants;
  • $100,000,000 for energy and environment coastal infrastructure;
  • $100,000,000 for state hazard mitigation, climate adaptation, and resilient land conservation;
  • $75,000,000 for municipal vulnerability preparedness;
  • $55,000,000 for river and wetland restoration programs;
  • $54,000,000 for rural investments.
Today’s bill also requires the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs and the Executive Office of Public Safety and Security to coordinate and strengthen the Commonwealth’s climate resilience and prepare for climate change impacts; publish an integrated state climate adaptation and hazard mitigation plan every five years; and establish frameworks for state agency and municipal vulnerability assessments to be included in the state plan.
Additionally, the legislation creates and funds a Global Warming Solutions Trust Fund to fund the implementation of the Global Warming Solutions Act, the state’s Clean Energy and Climate Plan, and state and local strategies for climate adaptation.
“This bill comes results from a lot of collaborative work between the House and the Senate and I’m very pleased to see it move forward,” said Senator William N. Brownsberger (D-Belmont), the lead Senate conferee.
“I was very pleased with the hard work and collaboration put forth by my colleagues in the House and Senate in crafting an important environmental bond bill,” Representative David Nangle (D-Lowell). There were some significant differences between the House and Senate versions of this bill, but after several sessions we finalized a bill that includes funding for hundreds of worthy projects across the state, as well as a state-of-the-art agricultural composting program, a commission to study ocean acidification, a global warming solutions trust fund, an agricultural estate tax credit, and significant funding for a lobster and fisheries processing study. Taken together, this $2.4 billion dollar bond bill makes great strides towards making Massachusetts a national leader in environmental protection and control.”
The Environmental Bond Bill also emphasizes the importance of public and parkland throughout the Commonwealth, appropriating $150,000,000 to tree planting, urban and suburban parks, EEA land acquisition, and trails.
"Having the opportunity to be on the conference committee and work with my colleagues to ensure every part of the state will benefit from sound environmental investments and policies was gratifying,” said Senator Anne Gobi (D-Spencer).  “We are very fortunate to have so many wonderful natural resources and this bond bill helps to make sure that those resources will be protected and conserved for future generations."
“As Chairman of the Environment Committee, I am proud to say this bill is an amazing example of bipartisan effort and compromise,” said Representative Smitty Pignatelli (D-Lenox), Chair Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture. “I’m grateful to Speaker DeLeo for including me in this conference process, and to my colleague, Representative Nangle for his leadership and understanding while we championed the issues we believed were most necessary for the environmental benefit of the Commonwealth. I understand neither side got everything it wanted out of the compromise, but I believe we’ve come out with a strong bond bill, funding necessary projects and environmental investments across the state, including an agricultural estate tax credit, integrated state climate adaptation plans, and an investment in preserving our cities and towns. This bond bill aims to preserve our land, restore dams and seawalls, and support various community investment grants which will all have lasting effects on our communities.”
Other highlights of the bill include the creation of the Agricultural Innovation Fund to finance grants for the Commonwealth’s agricultural and cranberry producers; and the Fishing Innovation Fund for the design, construction and modification of commercial fishing vessel; and for research, development, acquisition and deployment of advanced or innovative technologies such as sonar, satellite, radar and radio communications.

AG HEALEY OPPOSES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTACK ON FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAM

AG HEALEY OPPOSES TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S ATTACK ON FEDERAL FAMILY PLANNING PROGRAMProposal Includes “Gag Rule” That Prevents Some Providers from Discussing Safe and Legal Abortions with Their Patients

            BOSTON – Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey today called on the Trump Administration to withdraw its dangerous and illegal proposed rule that would effectively dismantle Title X, the national family planning program that provides more than $6.1 million in funding for health care services for Massachusetts women and families annually. The Administration’s proposal includes a “gag rule” that effectively bans Title X providers from discussing safe and legal abortions with their patients. 
           
            In comments submitted today to the Department of Health and Human Services, AG Healey and the attorneys general of Washington, Oregon and Vermont argue that the proposed rule would prevent millions of low-income women and families across the country from accessing critical family planning and health care services. If finalized, the proposed rule will impede Title X recipients from offering complete care to their patients by illegally preventing doctors, nurses, and other health care providers from referring their patients to a legal abortion provider, except in cases where a woman has already decided to have an abortion prior to receiving counseling.

            “Every woman in Massachusetts and across the country deserves the ability to make informed decisions about her reproductive health care with her health care provider,” said AG Healey. “This dangerous proposal puts the health of more than four million women in the country at risk by robbing them of their access to critical services. We will defend women’s access to reproductive health care.”

In 2016 alone, 90 Title X Massachusetts service sites provided more than 66,000 residents with a range of health care services including contraceptive and infertility services, pregnancy testing and options counseling, screenings for cervical and breast cancer, screenings and treatment for sexually transmitted diseases, and health education. According to the letter, these services not only make a profound difference in patients’ lives, they also save the state and the federal government an estimated $140 million per year, just for Massachusetts alone.  

According to the letter, Title X-funded centers helped avert 13,000 unintended pregnancies in Massachusetts. Access to family planning services, the letter contends, can enhance many aspects of a woman’s life including making it more likely that she will achieve her educational and career goals and that she will ultimately earn more money. These services can also lead to healthier relationships, better health outcomes, and better parenting.

The attorneys general argue that by severely curtailing the ability of health care providers to discuss abortion with patients, the government is interfering with the doctor-patient relationship and infringing on a woman’s ability to receive unbiased and complete medical information. This restriction, according to the letter, would jeopardize the health of low-income women and the ethical obligations of health care providers. The comments also criticize the proposed and onerous new requirement for clinics funded under program that perform abortions to have separate physical spaces for Title X funded services and abortion services, effectively requiring two separate clinics.

“I applaud Attorney General Healey for defending women’s basic rights and the most basic medical ethics, and for once again standing up to the Trump-Pence administration’s dangerous political interference in people’s health. The Trump-Pence administration’s gag rule is designed to dismantle an effective, bipartisan public health program in order to push an extreme ideological agenda,” Dr. Jennifer Childs-Roshakpresident and CEO of Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, said. “The result of this gag rule is that people will not get the health care they need. They won’t get birth control, cancer screenings, STD testing and treatment, or even general health exams. We cannot allow political interference to undermine our ability to provide the best care and information to our patients. Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts joins Attorney General Healey in calling on U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar to withdraw this dangerous rule.”

“The aim of the domestic gag rule is clear — eliminate the majority of Title X providers in Massachusetts through harmful, unnecessary regulations and restrictions," NARAL Pro-Choice Massachusetts Executive Director Rebecca Hart Holder said. “The proposed rule poses a serious threat to Bay Staters by creating barriers to accessing critical preventative reproductive healthcare services they need and deserve. Title X program has been a critical safety next for Massachusetts for decades. Cuts to Title X will harm over 66,000 Massachusetts residents, many of whom are low-income and unable to access these essential healthcare services elsewhere. Attorney General Maura Healey is a true champion for reproductive freedom and we applaud her vocal opposition to this proposed new rule."

Today’s comments are part of AG Healey’s ongoing commitment to fight for women’s access to reproductive health care. Last year, AG Healey successfullyadvocated for the passage of legislation that requires all state-regulated plans to provide coverage without cost-sharing for all unique forms of FDA-approved contraceptives, allows doctors to prescribe a 12-month supply of contraceptives, and helps eliminate barriers to timely access to emergency contraceptives. In October 2017, AG Healey sued the Trump Administration for rolling back a requirement under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) for employers to include birth control coverage in their health insurance plans.

This matter was handled by Legal Analyst Elizabeth Carnes Flynn of AG Healey’s Health Care Division, with assistance from Assistant Attorneys General Jonathan Miller, Chief of AG Healey’s Public Protection and Advocacy Bureau, Genevieve Nadeau, Chief of AG Healey’s Civil Rights Division, and Gabrielle Viator, Deputy Chief of AG Healey’s Policy and Government Division.