|
|
人生一定要有的八個朋友: 推手(Builder)、 支柱(Champion)、 同好(Collaborator)、 夥伴(Companion)、 中介(Connector)、 開心果(Energizer)、 開路者(Mind Opener)、 導師(Navigator)。 chutze@bostonorange.com ******************* All rights of articles and photos on this website are reserved.
|
|
Mayor’s Garden Contest
Deadline is July 10
BOSTON - Tuesday, June 25 - Mayor Michelle Wu announced the 28th annual Mayor’s Garden Contest highlighting the accomplishments of Boston’s urban gardeners. The competition provides an opportunity to recognize the skills of all Boston residents who contribute to the beauty of the city’s landscape.
Boston’s growers have until 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, July
10, to submit their
gardens for award contention. The contest recognizes gardeners who have landscaped,
planted flowers, trees, shrubs, and, in the process, helped beautify Boston’s
neighborhoods.
Gardeners or those nominating their favorite gardeners may
submit photos through the online application (our preferred method of
entry) boston.gov/garden-contest. Alternatively,
contestants may request an application by emailing their name and address
to gardencontest@boston.gov. Paper applications are
also available in English and 10 additional languages and can be found on the
website.
Judges will be deployed to visit the garden of each
finalist across the city during the week of July 22. Once the votes are
tallied, first-place winners will receive the coveted “Golden Trowel” award
from Mayor Wu while second and third-place winners will be awarded
certificates.
Gardeners who have won three or more times in the last ten
years will be automatically entered into the Hall of Fame. These distinguished
Hall-of-Famers are not eligible to enter as contestants but are invited to
return as judges.
First-place winners are eligible for a drawing for a
JetBlue Grand Prize consisting of roundtrip flights for two to any nonstop
destination from Boston. Terms, conditions, and blackout dates apply. In
addition, Mahoney’s Garden Centers will provide gardener’s gift bags to the top
three winners in each category, as well as gift certificates for the 2024 Hall
of Fame winners.
Stay up to date with the Mayor’s Garden Contest as well as
news, events, and design and construction work in Boston parks by signing up
for our email list at bit.ly/Get-Parks-Emails and following our
social channels @bostonparksdept on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram.
|
|
![]() |
中華網協 (NECINA) 陶東斌(左)副董事長,庄輝壯(右)連任會長。 中為董事倪繼紅。(周菊子攝) |
網協董事與歷任前會長,副會長。左起李震宇,沈心焯, 戴晨方,陶東斌,王振榕,徐劍。(周菊子攝) |
主旨演講部分,早上請了Novartis
科學發現部門主管的副總裁Jeremy
Jenkins談「在藥物發現中的人工智慧」。下午請的是哈佛醫學院教授Raju
Kucheriaptai談「精準醫學中的人類疾病遺傳學
(Genetics in Human Disease-Precision Medicine)」。
網協今年的年會有近300人出席。(周菊子攝) |
Kayak創辦人Paul English分享創業經驗。(周菊子攝) |
![]() |
網協幹部合影。(網協提供) |
![]() |
網協送紀念品感謝麻大教授丁薇(右)。(周菊子攝) |
Paul English 笑說自己就算在不需要請人時,也一直在招募人,因為他要找聰明,有天賦,能克服障礙,展示決心與專注能力,懂得團隊合作的人。
Paul English還在會中透露,他創辦了一個現在已有不下10萬名用戶的象棋社 (xiangqi.com)。
Novartis科學發現部門主管的副總裁Jeremy Jenkins。 (周菊子攝) |
![]() |
微軟Github Copilot主任Juam Pablo。(周菊子攝) |
![]() |
Tony Zhang (右)主持座談,左二為美迪西執行長陳春麟。(周菊子攝) |
麥肯錫諮詢顧問公司合夥人Hann Yew(左)。右為網協新任副會長何斌。(周菊子攝) |
網協還特地為青少年創業項目安排了一場座談。
紐英崙中華網路資訊年會在這次年會後,現任會長庄輝壯連任,何斌接任副會長,其餘組織幹部將由2名新屆會長重新招募。9名董事有董事會副董事長陶東斌,以及倪繼紅,沈心焯,王振榕,戴晨方等。(二次更新版)
網協送感謝狀給GV20執行長劉小樂。(周菊子攝) |
![]() |
波士頓華人攝影師協會在會場擺攤。(周菊子攝) |
![]() |
臺灣創新頁海報。(康麗雪提供) |
紐英崙玉山科技協會會長許益祥(左一)、前會長許翠玲 (右一)等人在劍橋市 和 DCB產業發展處處長劉韋博(右四)聚會,為明年的BIO會前會做準備。(周菊子攝) |
今年的BIO,已於6月3日到6日在美國西岸的聖地牙哥舉行,明年6月16日至19日,再回到波士頓舉行。
玉山科協會長許益祥(右二)、前會長許翠玲(左二)等人和 DCB產業發展處處長劉韋博相談甚歡。(周菊子攝) |
![]() |
DCB產業發展處處長劉韋博(右一起)和DCB董事長涂醒哲,DCB目前代理執行長, 陳綉暉博士和陳映嘉博士在臺灣見面。(圖片來自劉韋博處長) |
在這趟拜訪波士頓行程中,劉韋博處長除參加會議,還拜會了有意到台灣設立辦事處,由玉山科協前會長許衍明所創辦的AB BioScience,以及在RNAi領域居於領先地位的Alnylam製藥公司。他回臺灣後,更特地拜訪了甫加入Nvidia,出任解決方案架構師,即將於6月25日在中研院神經科學研究計畫講座中分享人工智慧計算應用的波士頓台灣人生物科技協會 (BTBA)共同創辦人陳映嘉博士。(更新版)
(Boston Orange 編譯)百萬富翁用腳投票,正陸續搬離麻州? 麻州會計師協會 (The Massachusetts Society of Certified Public Accountants)這星期公佈了一份調查報告,稱該會有三分之二會員都說,去年至少有一名客戶搬離麻州。
這是麻州內人稱”百萬富翁稅”的所得稅附加稅開始實施的第一年。90%的該會會員說,有其他的客戶考慮明年搬遷,而且幾乎所有會員都說,百萬富翁稅是客戶決定搬家的原因之一,而且其中有三分之一說那是主要原因。這些考慮搬遷的客戶,有一半以上年齡在30到60歲之間。
自從麻州選民在2022年11月投票通過徵收百萬富翁稅之後。諸如麻州會計師協會等企業團體都在分享導致富有居民搬遷的軼事,通常都是搬到免繳收入所得稅州,例如新罕布夏州
(NH),或佛羅里達州 (FL),但是實際數據很稀落,而且來自附加稅的稅收,迄今已經超過州政府的預估數目。
這附加稅是在麻州原有的5%收入所得稅之外,要富人為超過100萬元的年收入,多繳4%的附加稅,用以支持麻州的交通及教育費用。由教師工會支持的「扶養麻州
(Raise Up Massachusetts) 」聯盟等支持這做法者辯稱,徵稅花在這些公益事項上所帶來的經濟利益,可以彌平任何負面影響。
從美國稅務局所公佈的最近期資料中,目前還很難看到任何確鑿數據,但是麻州會計師公會執行長Zach
Donah表示,該會的統計調查顯示,徵稅促使更多麻州人重新考慮在哪兒居住。
支持者以百萬富翁附加稅所徵收到的金額為例證,指富有人家沒有成群結隊的遷離麻州,至少目前還沒有。麻州稅務局最近也報告,本會計年的前9個月,共收到百萬富翁稅款18億元,顯然很快就會超過麻州預估的全年徵收到20億元。
(Boston Orange 編譯) 美國最高法院6月21日裁決,基於國務院訴Muñoz案件中的”
領事不可審查條例”,領事官員拒絕簽證的決定,不能在法院受到質疑。亞美促進正義會(AAJC)認為這是維持了允許簽證決定納入種族及仇恨刻板印象考量的裁決。
亞美促進正義協會指出,”領事不可審查條例”是源自19世紀的反亞裔,以及反移民修辭,在眾所週知,1889年發生於最高法院的排華案,”Ping訴美國”中,立下先例。
亞美促進正義協會和福瑞德是松(Fred T. Korematsu) 法律及平等中心,以及義務律師Selendy Gay, PLLC在3月份遞交的”
法庭之友簡報
(An amicus brief)”中,列出了這條例的種族歧視根源歷史,並要求做出有利於原告的平權決定。
亞美促進正義協會的訴訟律師Shalaka Phadnis表示,”今日這決定,將使得移民案件的處理,受仇恨及刻板印象影響的危險增加”。 “我們感到失望的是,美國最高法院繼續不受監督的制度,可能決定簽證的依循,存在著歧視與刻板印象,把移民家庭及其生計撕得碎裂” 。
是松中心主任Robert
Chang表示,”儘管我對法院不理會種族主義起源,維持「領事不可審查條例」裁決感到失望,今天我更為Muñoz女士及 Asencio-Cordero先生,以及他們的小孩,還有其他無數的已經,或可能被拆散的家庭感到悲傷。
Asian
Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC and the Fred T. Korematsu Center Denounce
Supreme Court Ruling Allowing Racial Profiling and
Xenophobia in Visa Decisions
The Court’s troubling
decision affirms the validity of discriminatory visa decisions
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Supreme Court of the
United States (SCOTUS) today upheld a ruling that allows for racial profiling
and xenophobic stereotypes to make their way into visa decisions. Under the
doctrine of consular nonreviewability in the court case of Department of State v. Muñoz,
the court held that consular officials’ visa denials cannot be challenged in
court.
The doctrine of consular nonreviewability is a manifestation of
anti-Asian and anti-immigrant rhetoric dating back to the 19th century. Ping v. United States,
also known as The
Chinese Exclusion Case, was an 1889 Supreme Court case that
was one of the earliest and most significant cases that set the precedent for
the doctrine. An amicus brief filed by Asian
Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC and the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and
Equality with pro bono counsel Selendy Gay, PLLC, in March outlined the history
of the doctrine’s racist roots and called for an affirmative decision in favor of
the plaintiffs.
“Today’s decision will increase the risk of xenophobia and
profiling infecting the immigration process,” said Shalaka Phadnis, Litigation Staff
Attorney at Advancing Justice – AAJC. “We are disappointed that
the country’s highest court is continuing an unchecked system that can result
in discrimination and stereotyping to guide visa decisions and risks tearing
the livelihoods and families of immigrants apart.”
“As disappointed as I am that the Court continues to uphold the
consular nonreviewability doctrine despite its racist origins,” said Robert Chang, Executive Director of
the Korematsu Center. “Today I am mostly just sad for Ms.
Muñoz, Mr. Asencio-Cordero, their child, and countless other families who have
been and may be torn apart.”
Advancing Justice – AAJC and the Korematsu Center stand firmly
against such unchecked power by individual consular officials on decisions that
dramatically affect immigrant families and individuals. These organizations
will continue their work fighting for fair and equitable immigration decisions
for all.