網頁

星期六, 6月 19, 2021

波士頓華埠居民再向大麻店說"不" "你申請幾次,我們就反對幾次"

這場大麻店社區公聽會有50多人出席。
             (Boston Orange 周菊子綜合報導) 「不管你開幾次會,申請多少次,我們都『反對』」。波士頓華埠居民和波士頓市第二區市議員愛德華費林(Ed Flynn)日前再次齊聲告訴Royalty集團,反對他們在華埠旁的Jacob Wirth餐廳舊址開大麻店。

              Royalty集團執行長Andrea Pearce在會中回應,在波士頓市可以發放的52張大麻店執照發完前,該集團會不斷提出申請。

Royalty集團繼1月、4月之後, 615日在波士頓市鄰里服務局及波士頓市議員愛德華費林辦公室安排下,再次在網上的社區外展會議中,出現於華埠居民面前,以20餘頁文字敘述,說明該公司申請在史都華街(Stuart)31-39號開設休閒娛樂用大麻零售店樹星(Tree Star)”的概況。

波士頓市議員Ed Flynn強調他重視華裔,移民社區聲音,反對大麻店
在華埠附近開張。
              波士頓市鄰里服務局的華埠及皮革區連絡員許麗莎(Lisa Hy)事先說明,市府並不會在這場會議中就是否發放牌照做決定。她並鼓勵民眾發電郵給波士頓大麻委員會表達意見,cannabisboard@boston.gov

Royal集團執行長Andrea Pearce表示,在波士頓市發完52張牌照前,
她都會繼續申請。 (Andrea Pearce requested to take down her picture)

              Royal集團執行長Andrea Pearce做說明時,關於大麻零售店地點的文字圖片中寫有,波士頓市府有規定,2間休閒娛樂用大麻店(MRE)的彼此距離不得少於半英里,目前該公司提案開設的大麻店僅只差了199英尺,一旦取得波士頓計畫發展局(BPDA)的變通(variance)特別許可,就符合這區域規劃規定。在必須距離幼稚園到12年級學校500英尺之遠的區域規劃規定上,該店符合規定。

              在另一張以地方貢獻及社區支持為標題的說明文字圖片中,Royalty集團和地方上的非牟利機構談過,王氏/Boch教育及藝術計畫中心和波士頓共濟會(Masonic Temple)都已加入不反對行列。該集團還和波士頓亞裔青年會(YES),聖法蘭西斯屋(St. Francis House),蘿絲地(Rosie’s Place),婦女的午餐地(Woman’s Lunch Place)等地方機構談過捐款,給社區提共額外支持。另外在這頁的小字說明中,Royalty集團寫明,根據大麻管理局(Cannabis Control Commission)的申請牌照要求,該集團選擇每年捐款25,000元給亞裔青年會,以及王氏/Boch教育及藝術計畫中心,但這兩個機構並不需要支持或不反對Royalty集團的申請。

             
昆士中學校長張可仁擔心學生的身心健康受影響。
華人前進會榮譽主席湯建華,華埠居民
Linda SeeJoyce ChanMaggie ChanAgatha Tong, Manhua XuPeiying Yu,律師Rebecca Lee,昆士中學校長張可仁,聖法蘭西斯屋主任Karen LaFrazia,關心華埠的羅燕玲,愛默生(Emerson)學院的聯合副校長Margaret Ings等許多人都在會中發言,一面倒的反對Royalty集團在華埠旁邊開大麻店。

              波士頓市議員Ed Flynn也慎重的直接表示,他反對這大麻店的開張申請,因為他的選民們擔憂生活品質受影響,強烈反對。許多華埠居民告訴他,這附近有學校,托兒所,還有很多老人家,顯然不適合開一家這種店。他很重視華人社區、移民社區的聲音,所以他要說明自己反對這提案。

             
波士頓市亞裔社區聯絡員許麗莎(Lisa Hy)提醒民眾,可向波士頓市
大麻委員會提交意見。
在各人的發言中,律師
Rebecca Lee指出,Royalty集團的陳詞,不符事實,讓人困惑,因為波士頓計畫發展局(BPDA)並沒有批准變更區域規劃規定的權利,區域規劃上訴委員會(Zoning Board of Appeal)才有權批准有條件的使用許可,而且在區域規劃地圖上,Jacob Wirth餐廳舊址也並未列為准許開設大麻店的地點。

華人前進會共同主席湯建華強調華埠絕大多數人反對大麻店開張。
              Rebecca Lee也質疑,稱波士頓市稽核局(ISD)已發信拒絕了Royalty集團的申請。Andrea Pearce回應表示,該集團已上訴,案號BOA896068

              昆士校長張可仁很擔憂大麻店在學校附近開張,對學生會造成的影響,尤其該校有學生年齡已超過21歲,有權合法購買大麻。他提出大麻店會否容許消費者每天上門購買,有無每次,每天購買數量的限制?消費者如果在同一天,無論是親自或在網上,到不同的大麻店購買大麻,是否就能夠超量購買等許多問題,強調在學校附近開張大麻店不適合。

              羅燕玲指出,波士頓市有權發出52張大麻店營運牌照,但並不表示每個社區都必須接受大麻店。

              許多居民擔心,大麻店根本無法管制購買者在街道上吸食大麻,一旦發生狀況,倒楣的是街坊鄰居。再者,大麻可能讓人上癮,對人的生理、心裡都有影響,大麻店在華埠附近開張,對鄰近人們的生活環境品質影響之大,難以想像。

              有一名華埠居民表示,她有同事在麻州大道上工作,自從附近開了大麻店後,見到過有人吸食過量,神智不清,把衣服都脫掉了的在街道上亂走,她不希望自己的子女將來在這樣的環境中長大,出門都要擔驚受怕。

              另一名耆英也說,她家門前就曾有人盤據,吸食大麻或毒品,看到她走近,還想要打她,讓她幾乎沒法回家。

              聖法蘭西斯屋的Karen LaFrazia很客氣的表示,她完全沒有Royalty集團曾和該機構洽談過的印象,她也要強調,該機構並不支持大麻店在Jacob Wirth舊址開張。

               在整場公聽會中,只有一名黑人男子Terrance表示,他相信Royalty集團會正當經營。他表示自己已經50歲,是一名祖父,絕不會支持對小孩子有害的行業。

              湯建華表示,華埠居民在上一次的會議中已經討論過大麻店,也已表達過反對意見,相信就算Royalty集團發問卷,一樣會得到華埠居民大約90%以上反對的結果。

              另一名居民表示,華埠居民已經一再表示反對了,不明白為什麼這家大麻店還要一而再,再而三的申請在華埠旁開張。

              根據麻州大麻管制局(CCC)資訊,6躍起,符合資格的大麻店,將可申請成為遞送營運商。目前在麻州獲得認證的122名經濟賦能申請者,以及大約400名社會平等項目參加者,有資格申請遞送牌照。該局目前已為這快遞模式發出1張最終,7張臨時牌照。

              截至今年4月,麻州大麻管制局已發出249張牌照,已有122家大麻零售店開張。從201811月,麻州可以合法出售大麻以來,營業毛額已達145000萬元,向麻州政府貢獻了9000萬元稅款。

              在麻州開設大麻店,有數大障礙,一是資本。根據大麻市場研究調查公司Arcview的說法,在麻州要開設一家大麻店,估計至少要有50萬元。二是找到批給東道主社區協議(Host Community Agreement)的市鎮。然後是根據州法,大麻店的申請開張者必須繳付最高3%社區影響費(community impact fee)”。不過根據麻州大麻改革聯盟,以及麻州種植者顧問委員會的調查,79%的麻州東道主社區協議要求的付款費用都超過3%

星期五, 6月 18, 2021

NECINA 創新賽 6/25 暨25週年慶 6/26


 

大學沙龍第131期 : 空間革命、數據主權與新的法律程序







紐英崙華人歷史協會李燦輝講座 - 6/19 劉仲岳新書"恆久掙扎"


 Tunney F. Lee Lecture: Forever Struggle Boston's Chinatown, 1880-2018

by Chinese Historical Society of NE

https://www.eventbrite.com/e/tunney-f-lee-lecture-forever-struggle-bostons-chinatown-1880-2018-tickets-155988406523

About this event

Chinatown has a long history in Boston. Though little documented, it represents the city’s most sustained neighborhood effort to survive during eras of hostility and urban transformation. It has been wounded and transformed, slowly ceding ground; at the same time, its residents and organizations have gained a more prominent voice over their community’s fate.

In writing about Boston Chinatown’s long history, Michael Liu, a lifelong activist and scholar of the community, charts its journey and efforts for survival—from its emergence during a time of immigration and deep xenophobia to the highway construction and urban renewal projects that threatened the neighborhood after World War II to its more recent efforts to keep commercial developers at bay. At the ground level, Liu depicts its people, organizations, internal battles, and varied and complex strategies against land-taking by outside institutions and public authorities. The documented courage, resilience, and ingenuity of this low-income immigrant neighborhood of color have earned it a place amongst our urban narratives. Chinatown has much to teach us about neighborhood agency, the power of organizing, and the prospects of such neighborhoods in rapidly growing and changing cities.

Michael Liu is a native of Boston Chinatown. After graduating from college, he has been active on social justice and community issues especially concerning Boston Chinatown. He joined and helped create several community social justice groups. In the 1990’s, he was executive director of the Asian American Resource Workshop.

Michael is a graduate of Swarthmore College and completed graduate studies in engineering at Northeastern and University of Massachusetts Amherst before receiving his Ph.D. in Public Policy at University of Massachusetts Boston. Since then, he has worked as a researcher at the Institute for Asian American Studies at UMB. He co-authored an interpretive history of Asian American organizing, The Snake Dance of Asian American Activism.

6/21起在53個地點有波士頓青少年免費膳食站

    (Boston Orange編譯)波士頓代市長Kim Janey和市長的取得食物辦公室(Office of Food Access)(18)日宣布,波士頓夏吃項目的53個膳食站,將從621日起開張,另有14個膳食站將於今夏稍後開張。

                 2017年起創辦的這一項目,旨在擴大波士頓市內青少年獲取免費、健康食品的機會,確保青少年在學校關門的暑假期間,依然可以獲得食物。

                 希望為18歲以下青少年取得食物的波士頓居民,可以上網查找膳食站地點,www.boston.gov/summer-eats,或是寫下”Food”,或”Comida”,發送短訊到877-877,以獲取資訊。

                各膳食站的營運時間不同,大部分的膳食站目前提供早餐及午餐。家長可為未到現場的青少年拿取膳食。不需要登記,也不需要出示證明。礙於新冠病毒疫情,今年的餐食可以領取後拿走,不需要在現場食用。

              去年夏天,這項目在16各社區的91個膳食站,提供了1894748份膳食。其中有23個非傳統膳食站,包括一些波士頓房屋菊物業,農夫市場,社區及信仰組織,還有波士頓市政府大樓。今年的膳食站,有6個在波士頓房屋局所屬樓宇,14所波士頓公校,8個波士頓青年及家庭中心(BCYF)8個青年會(YMCA)4個農夫市場,30個社區及信仰機構,3個波士頓公共圖書館等。

                今夏,在學校關門後,將發放疫情EBT。凡是本學年領取P-EBT的幼稚園到12年級學生,將可領取分兩期給付、總額375元的P-EBT福利。第一期將於71日發放,第二訂81日發放。

 

MAYOR JANEY LAUNCHES 2021 BOSTON SUMMER EATS PROGRAM 

Meals are available to youth 18 years and younger at no cost and without registration or ID

 

BOSTON - Friday, June 18, 2021- Mayor Kim Janey and the Mayor’s Office of Food Access (OFA) today announced that 53 Boston Summer Eats Program meal sites will open on June 21, 2021, with an additional 14 sites opening later in the summer. The Boston Summer Eats program is an innovative effort to lessen the summer food gap by increasing the availability of non-traditional meal sites. The program launched in 2017 with the goal to expand access to free and healthy meals for youth and teens in Boston. 

“Ensuring continued food access to our children and youth throughout the summer after school closes is vital to their wellbeing,” said Mayor Janey. “Thank you to all of the community-based organizations for their partnership with the City of Boston in creating access across our city for all our children.”

Residents who wish to access free meals for youth aged 18 and under can find sites at www.boston.gov/summer-eats or find additional locations across the state by texting “Food” or “Comida” to 877-877. Hours of operation vary depending on the site, and most meal sites are currently offering breakfast and lunch. Parents can pick up meals for youth who are not present. No registration or identification is required. This year, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, meals will be taken off-site, rather than eaten in a congregate meal setting at the site.

The Boston Summer Eats program is led by the Mayor’s Office of Food Access (OFA) in partnership with Project Bread, the Greater Boston YMCA, and Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and is sponsored by the Boston Children's Hospital. Other partners involved in the 2021 Boston Summer Eats program include: Boston Public Library (BPL), Boston Housing Authority (BHA), and Boston Public Schools (BPS). 

Last summer, the program served 1,894,748 meals across 91 sites in 16 neighborhoods. Among the 97 sites, there were 23 non-traditional sites, including certain Boston Housing Authority properties, farmers markets, community and faith-based organizations, and Boston City Hall. This year meal sites include six Boston Housing Authority properties, 14 Boston Public Schools, eight Boston Centers for Youth & Families (BCYF) sites, eight YMCA sites, four farmers markets, 30 community- and faith-based organizations, and three Boston Public Library locations throughout 17 neighborhoods. 

“I am grateful for all the support we have had from all of our Boston Summer Eats program partners,” said Catalina López-Ospina, Mayor’s Office of Food Access Director “Together, we are reducing food insecurity one child at a time and making healthy summer meals accessible to all.” 

Additionally, this summer, the Pandemic EBT will be available for families when schools are closed. All K-12 students who received P-EBT this school year will receive a total of $375 in P-EBT benefits in two equal payments of $187.50 this summer. The first payment will be issued on July 1 and the second payment will be issued on August 1. Also, families who receive SNAP and received P-EBT this year for their children ages 0 through 6 will also receive two summer P-EBT payments of $187.50, totaling $375 for the summer. P-EBT payments for these children will be made on July 25 and August 25. For more information residents can visit www.map-ebt.org.

These funds will go directly to residents’ P-EBT card or SNAP/EBT card if they are enrolled in SNAP. Residents are encouraged to keep their P-EBT cards even when they have used all the funds, in case benefits are added in the future. These funds can be used to purchase groceries anywhere EBT or SNAP is accepted. Residents can download the Fresh EBT app to find nearby stores and farmer’s markets that accept EBT.

For more information about Food Access resources in Boston, visit here

波士頓代市長Kim Janey重遞37.6億元2022會計年度預算

MAYOR JANEY RESUBMITS FORWARD-LOOKING BUDGET FOCUSED ON BOSTON'S REOPENING, RECOVERY AND LONG-TERM RENEWAL

 

BOSTON - Friday, June 18, 2020 - Mayor Kim Janey today resubmitted her Administration's Fiscal Year 2022 (FY22) budget, which builds on her commitment to Boston’s equitable reopening, recovery and long-term renewal from the COVID-19 pandemic. As a result of a strong local economy and a significant infusion of federal funding from the American Rescue Plan, the $3.76 Billion FY22 operating budget proposes a year-over-year increase of $152 million, or 4.2 percent over FY21, and the $3.3 Billion Capital Plan represents a $200 million increase, the largest capital plan ever. The resubmission follows over 36 City Council hearings and working sessions that helped identify opportunities for further targeted investments and cost-savings. 

“During the past fifteen months, Boston has come together like never before, and we must take that spirit of collaboration and compassion and translate it into real investments for the City of Boston and our residents,” said Mayor Janey. “COVID-19 has brought on unprecedented economic and social change for our city, and this budget proposal meets the moment and makes targeted investments to ensure that as we recover from this public health crisis we are not going back to normal, but going forward better than before. I am proud of this budget and the enormous work that goes into running our City government and providing the services Bostonians need and rely on.”

In this budget resubmission, the City of Boston will make further investment in core city services and resident needs, while centering an equitable recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. After 36 public City Council hearings and robust public conversation, Mayor Janey’s revised budget offers support for Boston’s workforce, ensures the City’s neighborhoods are safe and welcoming, and fosters joy in our communities. All investments place equity at the forefront. To help recover from the financial and economic impacts of COVID-19, the city is expected to receive over $500 million in federal funding from the American Rescue Plan Act for use through the end of 2024. Of this funding, Mayor Janey has proposed a $50 million emergency relief plan to support an equitable recovery and reopening for Boston residents, workers and small businesses.

The allocation of this immediate funding was guided by the City of Boston’s Equitable Recovery Coordinating Committee (ERCC), which is being formed to ensure the equitable and efficient coordination of stimulus resources for the short- and long-term benefit of Boston residents, with an intentional focus on those who have been hurt most by the pandemic. The ERCC is steered by City leadership, with additional representation across City departments and external stakeholders. 

“In the midst of historic transition and COVID-19 recovery, Boston definitely needs a strong budget for the year ahead," said Councilor Kenzie Bok, the Chair of the Council's Ways & Means Committee. "We are poised as a City to make major investments in key recovery needs such as green jobs, affordable housing, and a robust capital plan. I am very glad that, through the Council’s budget scrutiny process, we’ve been able to work with the Administration to make important further adjustments that increase funding for safer streets and sidewalks, support our low-income retirees, enhance fire coverage, and expand job opportunities for young adults. The adjustments we've made will also boost our long-term efforts to preserve neighborhood history, create new units of public housing, and tackle the challenge of digital equity. I look forward to ensuring that we start the fiscal year in a strong position to execute on all these plans; the people of Boston deserve no less.”

Mayor Janey has made supporting Boston’s workforce a top priority. Her Administration’s proposed budget resubmission showcases a commitment to creating opportunities for all of Boston’s workers and developing supports to prepare our workforce for the jobs of the future. Mayor Janey’s proposed budget includes: 

·    Direct investments in workers including $1 million in green jobs; $1 million in job training in the hardest hit industries; and $1 million in job training for artists

·    Expanded programs to support child care entrepreneurs, immigrant professionals and $1 million for emerging community based sectors of mobility and zero waste and environmental sustainability jobs

·    An additional $4 million to expand our City-sponsored summer jobs program to 5,000 youth while adding 1,000 year-round youth jobs

·    $1 million to support the creation of affordable mixed-use commercial space and invest in the long term preservation of affordable housing units

·    $1 million to continue the effort of All Inclusive campaign to support the hard hit hospitality and tourism industry 

As part of her budget resubmission, Mayor Janey is also recommending the creation of the City’s first Chief of Workforce Development, $300,000 in jobs and work opportunities for young adults, a Career Counselor Librarian pilot program in East Boston, Mattapan and Roxbury, increased investments in Women's Advancement-Salary Negotiation Trainings and Wage Gap Training for Employers, and new funding that supports our long-term city workers with an update to the retirement Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) Base.

Mayor Janey’s FY22 budget proposal is built to support residents with a key focus on equitable distribution of resources to support residents who have been most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayor Janey’s proposed budget includes: 

·    Expanded Language Access resources for residents to city services

·    Racial Equity and Leadership Training for all City employees

·    The City of Boston’s first Environmental Justice Program Coordinator 

·    $1.1 million for early and no-excuse mail in voting in municipal elections

·    $1 million for digital resources to help end the digital divide in our communities

·    Mental and physical health resources for residents after the COVID-19 pandemic, including, $350,000 to increase food access and awareness, $250,000 for post COVID-19 mental health recovery services

·    Expanded events for Age Strong residents to promote community recovery and reconnection

·    Support and staffing for infectious diseases infrastructure in the Boston Public Health Commission 

·    1.5 million to expand on mobility improvements

·    Social workers and family liaisons in every Boston Public School 

As part of her budget resubmission, Mayor Janey is also recommending $1 million for the City’s first Office of Participatory Budgeting, investments in a new Healthy Places Initiative targeted for environmental justice populations, who often live in hotter neighborhoods with less tree canopy cover, and $250,000 in additional resources to support equitable procurement and access for City contracts. 

Mayor Janey recognizes the importance of making sure that all Boston residents are able to feel safe and welcome in our neighborhoods. This budget helps support additional affordable housing opportunities and alternative models to traditional policing. The proposed budget includes:

·    $1.3 million for Boston’s first Office of Police Accountability and Transparency

·    $1.75 million to explore Alternative Policing Models

·    Expanding the Boston Police Force by 30 officers and 20 new cadets 

·    Enhancing support for officers on sick and injured leave 

·    An additional $2.5 million in housing vouchers, completing the City’s $5 million commitment

To expand on the Mayor’s commitment to creating welcome communities, Mayor Janey also recommended an additional $2.25 million investment to address road safety issues, add funding to recruit additional firefighters, and preserve the Immigrant Defense Fund and expand support for the Temporary Protected Status program. 

Mayor Janey created her Joy Agenda as an investment in Boston’s collective wellbeing as we recover from the COVID-19 pandemic. This citywide approach creates open and safe spaces, reimagines policies and practices to promote city services, creates ways for residents to reconnect with each other, and invests in arts and culture, small businesses, and youth. Mayor Janey’s proposed investments for the Joy Agenda include:

·    Making membership in Boston Centers for Youth & Families free and waives all past due Boston Public Library fees

·    Funds for programming at the Strand Theater and citywide public art conservation and maintenance

·    Additional resources for the Parks Department to expand summer recreation programs

·    Provides resources to support expanded outdoor dining

Mayor Janey’s resubmitted budget proposal includes investments for Joy Agenda mini grants, investments in exploring municipal broadband so all neighborhoods can access reliable internet, support for future outdoor dining for restaurants, and the launch of the Healthy Places Initiatives to mitigate adverse impacts of excessive heat. 

Mayor Janey’s FY22 budget proposal expands upon her forward-looking plan to support Boston's equitable reopening, recovery and long-term renewal. For more information about the budget, visit Boston's budget website at budget.boston.gov.

張志誠 6/19 主講 影后林黛與那個年代

 


慈濟波士頓青少年樂團夏季招生

 慈濟波士頓青少年樂團夏季開始招生!

為了能夠給予青少年音樂家一個提高社交技巧、學習團隊合作、培養責任感、和提高認知能力及增加演奏樂趣的機會,慈濟波士頓聯絡處將提供波士頓地區的青少年音樂家一個在學習音樂的同時,還可以學習中國文化和慈濟慈悲濟世人文精神的優良團隊。青少年音樂家每個星期有一個半小時的樂團排練時間,接著有三十分鐘的人文課程,如皮影戲,慈濟的靜思語,花道和茶。學員也可以有機會和慈少(慈濟青少年志工團隊) 一起做社區服務,培養利己利他的人道精神!!

波士頓青少年樂團很榮幸請到音樂博士陳志新老師為此樂團音樂總監及指揮。陳志新博士畢業於波士頓大學並取得銅管樂演奏博士學位,曾與國立台灣交響樂團附設青年管樂團及康科德管樂團擔任客席獨奏,陳博士曾在中華表演藝術基金會青少年中國器樂比賽和音樂會中擔任評判及表演嘉賓。作為指揮陳博士曾經擔任台北同濟管樂團指揮與及大波士頓亞裔青少年交響樂團客席指揮。目前陳博士是布魯克萊社區管樂團和大波士頓文化協會國樂團音樂總監暨指揮也是波士頓水底魚中國打擊樂團的團長及創辦人。

名請洽慈濟波士頓聯絡處,報名電話:617-762-0569,Email: tzuchiboston@gmail.com或填此 Google Form 表格 https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSee7MMnU2eD9gLeUt1tFuDpCL27fRVvAcPXyIp8nwHwbtPXBA/viewform?vc=0&c=0&w=1&flr=0

請提供以下訊息:學生姓名,年齡,樂器名稱,家長姓名,電郵,電話!

麻州開辦大學課程高中 今秋將添5所

 

Baker-Polito Administration Announces Five New Early College Program Designations to Launch This Fall

Roundtable discussion hosted at Worcester State University highlights success of early college programming

WORCESTER – Governor Charlie Baker and Lt. Governor Karyn Polito today met with high school students from several Worcester public high schools to hear about their experiences in early college courses, a statewide initiative where high school students earn college credits at no cost and gain experience and confidence to enroll in college. The Baker-Polito Administration also announced the designation of five new early college programs to launch this September. 

With the newly approved programs, 43 high schools will have designated early college programs this fall that will impact approximately 4,500 high school students. Some Massachusetts students have earned enough college credits to be awarded an associate’s degree at the same time as their high school diploma.

Governor Baker and Lt. Governor Polito participated in a roundtable discussion with Worcester Public Schools Superintendent Maureen Binienda, Worcester State University President Barry Maloney, Quinsigamond Community College President Luis Pedraja, Education Secretary James Peyser, Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Jeffrey C. Riley, and several legislators, including Senator Anne Gobi (D-Spencer) and Representative Jeffrey Roy (D-Franklin), co-chairs of the Joint Committee on Higher Education Committee. 

Worcester was among the first school districts in the Commonwealth to apply for state designation for an early college program in 2018. The school district is one of only a few district-wide models, offering early college at every high school in the city.  During the 2020-2021 school year, approximately 400 Worcester high school students across the district took college classes, earning about 1,900 college credits.

The five early college programs approved this week include:

  • Gardner Academy for Learning and Technology in partnership with Mt. Wachusett Community College
  • High School of Commerce in Springfield in partnership with Springfield Technical Community College
  • North Quincy High in partnership with Quincy College
  • Quincy High School in partnership with Quincy College
  • Waltham High School in partnership with Framingham State and Massachusetts Bay Community College

劉雲平等國會議員促司法部調查FBI誤控亞裔科學家為間諜的不當行為

              (Boston Orange 編譯)國會議員劉雲平(民主黨,洛杉磯)Mondaire Jones(民主黨,紐約)Pramila Jayapal(民主黨,華盛頓)等眾議院司法委員會委員17日力促司法部監察長Michael E. Horowitz調查有關聯邦調查局(FBI)在未能成功起訴田納西州大學工程系教授胡安明(譯音,Anming Hu)一案中有不當行為的報告。

             據悉,聯邦調查局錯誤的指控胡教授是中國間諜,錯誤的構陷胡教授是中國軍隊特工,並且使用虛假資訊把胡教授放入聯邦禁飛名單,還對他採取了其他行動。

              劉雲平等人表示,多年來政府都在針對亞裔科學家及教授展開調查或起訴,最近期的是中國計劃,胡教授顯然是在這對具有中國血統者有不公平且不正當懷疑的中國計劃下被起訴的。聯邦調查局的這不當行為,以及審判失敗,是諸如李文和、陳霞芬、郗小星等類似,全都被錯誤指控為中國間諜案件的又一次重演。這封信要求檢察長審閱中國計劃是否施加不必要壓力,使得司法部人員依族裔或種族行事。

REPS LIEU, JONES, AND JAYAPAL URGE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT REVIEW OF REPORTED FBI MISCONDUCT FALSELY ACCUSING ASIAN SCIENTISTS OF ESPIONAGE

 

WASHINGTON  - Yesterday, Congressman Ted W. Lieu (D-Los Angeles)Congressman Mondaire Jones (D-NY), and Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) – all members of the House Judiciary Committee – urged Department of Justice Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz to investigate reports of alleged misconduct by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in their unsuccessful prosecution of University of Tennessee (UT) Engineering Professor Anming Hu. The FBI is reported to have falsely accused Professor Hu of being a Chinese spy; falsely implicated Professor Hu as an operative for the Chinese military; and used false information to put Professor Hu on the federal no-fly list — among a number of other actions.

 

For years, the government has targeted scientists and academics of Asian descent for investigation and prosecution, most recently as part of the “China Initiative.” Professor Hu was apparently prosecuted under the China Initiative, which can result in the unfair and unjustified suspicion of those who are of Chinese descent. The alleged FBI misconduct and mistrial echoes similar cases such as Wen Ho Lee, Sherry Chen, and Professor Xi, all of whom were falsely accused of spying for China. The letter requests the IG to review whether the China Initiative puts untoward pressure on DOJ personnel to engage in racial or ethnic profiling.

 

In the letter, the Members write:

 

Dear Inspector General Horowitz:

 

As Members of the House Judiciary Committee, we are deeply troubled by the alleged misconduct of the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the unsuccessful prosecution of University of Tennessee at Knoxville associate professor Anming Hu. The FBI allegedly falsely accused Professor Hu of being a Chinese spy; falsely implicated Professor Hu as an operative for the Chinese military; and used false information to put Professor Hu on the federal no-fly list — among a number of other actions. The prosecution of Professor Hu, which was purportedly conducted under the China Initiative, has now ended in a mistrial. We are referring this case for your review. 

 

According to media reports:

“FBI Agent Kujtim Sadiku admitted last week in an ongoing trial in Knoxville that federal agents:

  • Falsely accused former UTK associate professor Dr. Anming Hu of being a Chinese spy.
  • Falsely implicated him as an operative for the Chinese military in meetings with Hu’s bosses.
  • Used false information to put Hu on the federal no-fly list.
  • Spurred U.S. customs agents to seize Hu’s computer and phone and spread word throughout the international research community that Hu was poison.
  • Used false information to justify putting a team of agents to spy on Hu and his son, a freshman at UTK, for nearly two years.
  • Used false information to press Hu to become a spy for the U.S. government.”

 

If these allegations are true, the FBI’s misconduct is alarming. We request that you investigate this matter and look at a range of issues, including but not limited to the following:

 

  1. Did FBI agent Sadiku or other agents make false accusations and/or use false information against Professor Hu?

 

  1. Did prosecutors at the Department of Justice know about the alleged misconduct of the FBI in this case?

 

  1. Was the investigation or prosecution of Professor Hu conducted under the China Initiative?

 

  1. Did racial or ethnic profiling occur in this case?

 

  1. Was there an adequate non-racial or non-ethnic factual predicate to open this investigation?

 

  1. Does the China Initiative put untoward pressure on FBI agents or Department of Justice prosecutors to engage in racial or ethnic profiling?

 

Thank you for your attention to this important matter.

 

Sincerely,