星期三, 10月 26, 2016

南京大屠杀幸存者夏淑琴访美 将这场浩劫保存为世界记忆

轉載

南京大屠杀幸存者夏淑琴访美  将这场浩劫保存为世界记忆

南京大屠杀幸存者夏淑琴访美  将这场浩劫保存为世界记忆
87岁的南京大屠杀幸存者夏淑琴,1023日应邀专程从中国到洛杉矶,向各界人士细述当年全家在南京遭受日本军队屠杀的惨烈过程,感谢当年在南京参与救援的美国人民。同时接受著名犹太裔导演斯皮尔伯格在南加州大学创办的SHOAH基金会承办的三维录影存证,希望将这场屠杀浩劫保存为世界记忆。
夏淑琴老人在现场回忆说,当年她才8岁,全家老老小小共13口人1937121的一天,家里突然闯入一伙日本人,父亲在开门时就被日本兵当场杀死。我们一家有5姐妹,最大的姐姐15岁,二姐1岁,我还有一个4的妹妹和一个1岁的妹妹。我的大姐被强奸,死在床上,我的二姐也被强奸死在桌子上,我被捅了3刺刀,一下就疼晕过去。醒来后,浑身是血,发现家里的人只有4岁的妹妹还活着,闹着要吃的,我看到妈妈抱着岁的妹妹死在桌子底下。年仅8岁的夏淑琴就这样带着妹妹,靠一些锅巴和缸里的冷水在家里躲了10天,直到有外籍人士敲门,夏淑琴看到不是日本人才出来,随后得到国际救援机构的救助。
虽然时隔近80年, 夏淑琴讲述当年的浩劫仍难忘悲痛,数次落泪。夏家悲惨经历被当时南京红十字国际委员会主席约翰马吉用摄影机记录,著名的《拉贝日记》中也有这段记录。战后在审判日本战犯军事法庭上,夏淑琴一家遭遇曾作为证据采用。
夏淑琴说,她后来知道救他们的有美国人、德国人。她说,当时心里就在想,为什么这些外国人要救我们呢?她说,这次能有机会来美国,特别要对当年救助她们的美国人民表示感谢,并深深鞠躬。
据了解,在南京大屠杀期间,约有22名美国民众在南京,他们中有传教士、新闻记者、医生和护士等。他们不仅留下了珍贵的文章、图像和影像记录。同时也在南京设立国际安全区、鼓楼医院,保护和拯救了大批的南京平民。
美国记者率先向世界报道了南京大屠杀的真实情况。弗兰克·蒂尔曼·德丁在19371218日的《纽约时报》头版新闻上,发表了《屠戮意味着占领南京———俘虏全部被杀》;耶茨·麦克丹尼尔在同一天的《芝加哥论坛报》上发表了《战地记者日记内描述的南京恐怖》曾在鼓楼医院工作的美国外科医生威尔逊是南京大屠杀期间城内唯一的外科医生。
据美国纪念南京大屠杀联合会长刘祥介绍,2015109,联合国教科文组织通过将南京大屠杀正式列入世界记忆名录。此次夏淑琴赴美见证南京大屠杀活动及行程,由洛杉矶南京浩劫期间美国英雄纪念馆、世界和平与人权教育基金理事会、美国南加州大学纳粹大屠杀基金会以及美国纪念南京大屠杀联合会等举办。
当天的活动,全场座无虚席,来自南加州多所大学的留学生们在现场担任义工。美国华人公共外交促进会会长任向东、北美职通车董事会主席刘方等表示,希望青年一代不要忘记民族的惨痛历史;美国民众在南京大屠杀期间对南京民众的救援,与飞虎队一样都是美中人民民间友好永恒的记忆AACY洛杉矶

星期二, 10月 25, 2016

麻州總檢察官辦公室推出族裔正義及平等顧問委員會 30名委員無亞裔

AG HEALEY KICKS OFF HER OFFICE’S ADVISORY COUNCIL ON RACIAL JUSTICE AND EQUITY
30-Member Council Will Strengthen the Office’s Efforts to Address Racial Bias and Disparities

BOSTON — Attorney General Maura Healey Monday kicked off a newAdvisory Council on Racial Justice and Equity to address persistent racial disparities and barriers for communities of color. 

“This Advisory Council will help me lead an office that confronts racism and structural disparities,” said AG Healey.  “Advancing equity and opportunity is a top priority for our office.”

            The advisory council will meet regularly throughout the year. Monday’s kickoff meeting was an opportunity for members to discuss issues ranging from criminal justice reform to fair health care disparities to lending and gun violence

The new council is made up of leaders and advocates from organizations across the state -  including the Union of Minority Neighborhoods, the Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts, the YWCA Springfield, the NAACP and MassVote - who will work directly with the AG’s Office to assist their efforts in directly engaging with these communities.

“I’m proud to serve on AG Healey’s Advisory Council Racial Justice and Equity,” said Monalisa Smith, the Executive Director of Mother’s for Justice and Equality. “I believe this is a big step in acknowledging and addressing the injustices that hinder our children from growing up in safe and nurturing environments.”

“I applaud Attorney General Healey and her staff for their powerful commitment to addressing the needs of people of color,” said Iván Espinoza-Madrigal, the Executive Director of the Lawyer’s Committee for Civil Rights and Economic Justice. “As a Latino lawyer working in the civil rights and racial justice movement, I know firsthand the unconscious bias that people of color face. I’m honored to be a part of this important effort and to help empower all people in Massachusetts.”
"I look forward to working with the Attorney General and my counterparts on the Advisory Council to fight for social justice and equality for all, and to advocate for those who feel they have no voice,” said Pat Yancey, President of the NAACP Worcester Chapter. 

For a link to the names and bios of all the advisory council members clickhere

選票第二個問題特許學校 反對方意見

Question 2 Proponents Already Planning to Circumvent Will of Voters, Expand Charter Schools Whether They Win or Lose
Beacon Hill Insider, Charter Applicants Reveal Post-Election Plot
BOSTON — As public polls show Question 2 in danger of failing this November, the ballot question’s proponents are already plotting to circumvent the will of the voters and drastically expand the number of charter schools in Massachusetts, regardless of the outcome of the election. In an interview with Jim Braude on WGBH’s Greater Boston last night, lead Question 2 spokesperson and consultant Marty Walz revealed plans to target communities that support Question 2 for charter expansion after the November election, should Question 2 not pass.
“What if there’s a new proposal in the legislature to lift the cap in the communities where there is a Yes vote?” said Walz, a former State Representative who was House Chair of the Joint Committee on Education, a ranking member of House Ways and Means, and a member of the House leadership team. “If the No votes come from certain communities that indicates people in those communities don’t want more charters.”
Public polls in recent weeks have shown support for Question 2 in the suburbs south of Boston and surrounding Worcester, meaning that those communities are likely to be targeted for charter expansion if Question 2 fails statewide.
“The proponents of Question 2, funded by hidden out-of-state billionaires, could have written a ballot question that only applies to the communities at the charter cap,” said Sean Costello, Chair of the Marshfield School Committee, who debated Walz on WGBH last night. “Instead, Question 2 is a reckless proposal that will wreak havoc on every community in Massachusetts. Facing the possibility of defeat, they are now proposing to disregard the will of the voters with backdoor legislation allowing an unlimited number of charter schools in communities that vote Yes on Question 2.”
In the Worcester Telegram & Gazette this weekend, charter school applicants revealed their plans to target suburban communities that support Question 2 for future charter expansion.
“Knowing which communities in Massachusetts are pro-charter will be priceless information for future charter developers,” said Anne Stuhlman, who was part of an unsuccessful application to the state last year to open a charter school in Shrewsbury, which is already losing $677,076 to charter schools this year.
Concetta Verge, a proponent of a Fitchburg charter school which was also unsuccessful, “said there are ‘a lot of isolated, small groups’ in the region that are in favor of the charter model that would be emboldened by a yes vote on 2. Especially in Central Massachusetts, where recent attempts to open new charters have failed to get much traction, a showing of support for the idea from local voters would make a ‘big difference’ in whether those groups, or new ones, try again,” according to the Telegram & Gazette.
“These comments show the truth about Question 2: no community is safe from unrestricted charter school growth, and local votes will be used as a sign of support for local charter school expansion” said Juan Cofield, president of the New England Area Conference of the NAACP and chair of the Campaign to Save Our Public Schools. “It’s more important than ever for voters in every single community to vote No on Question 2.”

Background on Question 2
Charter schools are privately run schools that operate with taxpayer funding. Every time a new charter school opens, it takes money away from the public schools in that school district. This year, according to state data, 231 local school districts will lose a projected $451,338,729 to charter schools, even after state reimbursements.1 That’s why 200 school committees across the state have voted to oppose Question 2.2
A statewide commission recently reported that public schools in Massachusetts are already underfunded by more than $1 billion, even before Question 2.If passed, Question 2 would allow the state to approve 12 new charters schools a year, every year, forever, with no limit on how much money a single school district could lose. This would nearly triple the number of charter schools in just 10 years and take away an additional $1 billion each year from our local public schools. After 20 years, local public school districts would be losing nearly $4 billion a year to charter schools.4
Local communities and their school committees have no say in the approval or operation of charter schools. The state approves charter schools even when the communities where they will be located are opposed to them. This has happened in Brockton, Gloucester and many other communities.
A growing list of local and statewide organizations oppose Question 2, including the Massachusetts PTA, the Massachusetts Association of School Committees, the Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, the Massachusetts Elementary School Principals' Association, the Massachusetts Municipal Association, the NAACP New England Area Conference, Progressive Massachusetts, Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts, and city councils, school committees, and boards of selectmen representing more than 240 communities across the state.
###
Save Our Public Schools is a grassroots organization of Massachusetts families, parents, educators and students. We are committed to ensuring equal educational opportunity for every child; less testing and more learning; stopping the state from opening additional charter schools that will drain millions more from public education; increasing funding to provide high-quality public schools for all children; and protecting local control over schools. Our public schools cannot afford to lose vital funding while we are seeing programs cut and activities reduced. Learn more and sign up for updates at saveourpublicschoolsma.com.

1. http://saveourpublicschoolsma.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/FY17-Sending-District-Money-Lost.pdf
2. http://masc.org/publications-3/charter-schools/734-charter-school-cap-resolution-school-districts-list
3. http://www.mass.gov/legis/journal/desktop/2015/fbrc.pdf
4. http://massteacher.org/~/media/Files/charter_schools/simulation_of_funding_loss.xls

Baker-Polito Administration Launches Energy Savings Website

Baker-Polito Administration Launches Energy Savings Website
Clearinghouse for Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency Incentives

BOSTON – October 25, 2016– The Baker-Polito Administration today announced the launch of Commonwealth Energy Tool for Savings (energyCENTS), a web platform for the Commonwealth’s ratepayers to search available energy saving opportunities. Developed and launched by the Department of Energy Resources (DOER), energyCENTS provides a single entry point for Massachusetts residents and businesses looking for the energy rebates, incentives, loans, and tax credits available from MassSave®, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and other organizations, like the federal government.

“Robust partnerships between ratepayers and federal, state, and private entities across the Commonwealth have created a host of incentives to reduce energy costs, usage, and emissions,” said Governor Charlie Baker. “energyCENTS will give residential and commercial customers alike the opportunity to adopt Massachusetts’ nation leading clean energy and energy efficiency programs.”

“Ratepayers across the Commonwealth save millions on their energy bills annually due to many of Massachusetts’ energy savings incentives,”said Lieutenant Governor Karyn Polito. “This online tool will make it even easier for all ratepayers to identify opportunities to further take advantage of these money-saving measures.”

Currently, there are over 250 incentives and rebates available to Massachusetts electric and natural gas ratepayers from the state and federal governments and utility program administrators. energyCENTS is a platform that allows ratepayers, from residential to commercial and industrial, to search for rebates and incentives across utilities, entities and applications while refining searches by keywords and zip codes. Results from energyCENTS searches will direct ratepayers to the rebate or incentive sponsor’s website for additional information and application.

“Massachusetts is a national leader on clean energy innovation and energy efficiency programs, saving ratepayers money and reducing emissions,” said Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs Matthew Beaton. “energyCENTS is a one-stop shop for the Commonwealth’s ratepayers to take full advantage of the myriad of savings opportunities offered by the state and federal governments, along with our utility partners.”

“With the launch of energyCENTS, the Commonwealth continues to lead the nation in adopting clean energy and energy efficiency programs by streamlining the search process for ratepayers,” said Department of Energy Resources Commissioner Judith Judson. “The Baker-Polito Administration is committed to ongoing collaboration with public and private partners to enable greater access to clean energy for all consumers.”

The dynamic web platform provides opportunities from electric vehicles, appliances, home energy assessments, solar electricity to the latest energy initiatives available in the Commonwealth. This user-friendly, transparent tool aims to link energy opportunities to funding sources and Commonwealth ratepayers.  

“While the desire to save money on our energy bills is widespread, at times people, companies, or institutions lack the tools they need to follow through,” stated State Representative Thomas A. Golden, Jr. (D-Lowell), Chairman of the Joint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities, and Energy.  “DOER’s new website aims to solve that problem – whoever you are, whatever your situation –energyCENTS will provide answers and direct you to resources to help you secure the greatest amount of savings possible.”

“This website will help residential and commercial consumers navigate a myriad of energy products, services and an ever-expanding portfolio of available energy options,” said Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester).  “From rebates to retrofits and appliances to apps this Website will help energy users save money, save time, and lower energy usage.”

“This is a great opportunity for citizens of the Commonwealth to save energy, save money and help our environment in one convenient location,” said House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. (R-North Reading).

“I’m excited to see the potential of energyCENTS,” said State SenatorBenjamin Downing (D-Pittsfield). “We are the leader in energy efficiency, but there is so much more we can do. This will help families, businesses and communities take our programs to the next level.”

The Baker-Polito Administration recently announced that the 2013-2015 Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plan achieved record savings for electric and natural gas sales in 2015, 3.01% of electric sales and 1.23% of natural gas sales. The current Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plan, approved by the Department of Public Utilities in January 2016, builds upon the success of the previous plan and again sets nation-leading goals for energy savings, setting savings goals of 2.94% of electric sales and 1.24% of gas sales.

State and Federal Officials Release Marine Wildlife Studies to Guide Offshore Wind Development

State and Federal Officials Release Marine Wildlife Studies to Guide Offshore Wind Development
Studies Will Inform Offshore Wind Permitting Process

BOSTON – October 25, 2016 – State and federal officials today released a pair of marine wildlife studies on the presence of endangered whale, turtle and bird species to inform federal offshore wind development permitting processes. The studies, which are the result of a three-year effort sponsored by MassCEC in partnership with the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), will provide baseline data to guide and expedite the federal permitting process for offshore wind development, and work to support the deployment of offshore wind in Massachusetts in an environmentally responsible manner.

The studies, which were funded by BOEM and the Massachusetts Renewable Energy Trust, found no significant conflicts between wildlife and offshore wind development in federally designated wind energy areas beginning 14 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard and identified opportunities to minimize impacts to marine wildlife in those areas. Researchers conducted the surveys using underwater acoustical buoys as well as aircraft flights staffed with wildlife observers. The large whale and sea turtle survey team was based at the New England Aquarium and a second team from the College of Staten Island studied impacts on seabirds.

“As the Commonwealth begins to harness the benefits of offshore wind power generation, it is imperative that we balance innovation with our obligation of environmental stewardship for the waters surrounding our state,” said Energy and Environmental Affairs Secretary Matthew Beaton. “These studies will streamline the permitting process for an emerging energy growth sector while protecting the environment so the Commonwealth can solidify its position as a hub of energy innovation while creating high-quality jobs and providing cost-effective power for ratepayers.”
  
The surveys greatly expand the existing understanding of wildlife presence and activity in the wind energy area. Federal permitting agencies will use the results of the studies to review developers’ site-specific plans for construction and operations of offshore wind projects.

“Offshore wind presents a significant resource of clean, homegrown, renewable energy for us to cultivate here in Massachusetts,”said MassCEC Interim CEO Steve Pike. “By completing this proactive environmental work, the Commonwealth is well positioned to realize significant benefits of the burgeoning offshore wind industry.”

The whale and turtle data was collected from 76 aerial surveys conducted in the study area between October 2011 and June 2015. The data was supplemented by more than 1,000 days of continuous underwater acoustic recording for whales. Throughout their observations, researchers from the New England Aquarium sighted 60 North Atlantic right whales, a critically endangered species, over the entire study only during winter and spring. The North Atlantic right whales primarily migrate into the area and engage in short-term feeding before moving onto feeding grounds throughout the Gulf of Maine. 

“The data, information, and analyses developed through this long-term cooperative study have improved our understanding of the distribution and abundance of marine mammals and sea turtles in the area,” said Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management Director Bruce Carlisle. “The study demonstrates the effectiveness of collaboration across local, state and federal agencies, offshore wind developers, fishermen, and communities.”

Researchers from the College of Staten Island recorded 25 species of seabirds from a total of 38 aerial surveys conducted between November 2011 and January 2015.Two locations, known as “hotspots”, were identified where larger than average aggregations of seabirds occurred on a regular basis. Both hotspots were located outside the federal wind energy areas.

“This multi-year study is a major advance in the scientific understanding of marine mammals in what was largely a previously un-surveyed and uncharacterized habitat revealing new right whale habitat-use patterns and demonstrating consistent seasonal occurrence in portions of the study area,” said New England Aquarium Chief Scientist of Marine Mammals Dr. Scott D. Kraus. “The study provides a robust baseline assessment to inform the federal permitting process, and will help inform strategies to minimize or avoid impacts from construction or operations.” 

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management has lease agreements with three offshore wind developers – Deepwater Wind, DONG Energy, and Offshore MW – to build projects in the federal waters south of Massachusetts. They will compete to provide 1,600 megawatts of offshore wind – which would cut annual carbon emissions by 2.4 million tons and power one-third of Massachusetts homes – over the next 10 years as part of the comprehensive energy legislation signed by Governor Baker in August. 

The studies build upon the MassCEC’s nation-leading efforts to advance the responsible and efficient deployment of offshore wind and position Massachusetts as a hub for the emerging U.S. offshore wind industry. These efforts also include the operation of the New Bedford Marine Commerce Terminal, the first facility in the U.S. designed for offshore wind construction, assembly, and deployment projects; operation of the Wind Technology Testing Center, one of the largest in the world, helping manufacturers advance technology and drive down costs; an offshore wind transmission study to assess the most cost-effective cable routes and interconnection locations to incorporate offshore energy into the regional grid; a metocean data initiative to advance the collection of wind data near federal offshore wind energy areas south of Martha’s Vineyard; grants for offshore wind research at Massachusetts universities and institutions to optimize technology and deployment to Massachusetts wind and ocean conditions; supply chain analysis to connect Massachusetts manufacturers, suppliers, and service companies to offshore wind developers and contractors; and investment in training programs to ensure that Massachusetts residents have the skills and certifications necessary to participate in the offshore wind industry.

“Mass Audubon applauds MassCEC’s work that’s being done in terms of marine wildlife characterization and while we support the efforts to develop offshore wind energy off the coast of Massachusetts, we also support the efforts to protect the most important and critically endangered species in the North Atlantic,” said Jack Clarke, Director of Public Policy for Mass Audubon.

“Thanks to the leadership of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center and the U.S. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, we now have valuable information needed to protect vulnerable species like endangered North Atlantic Right Whales as offshore wind projects move forward,” said Catherine Bowes, Senior Manager at National Wildlife Federation. “National Wildlife Federation strongly supports responsibly developed offshore wind power, and we look forward to working together to ensure this new research guides our pursuit of a critically-needed new clean energy source for the Commonwealth.”

“The United States Bureau of Ocean Energy Management remains deeply committed to ensuring that renewable energy development on the Outer Continental Shelf is done in a safe and environmentally responsible manner,” said BOEM Director Abigail Ross Hopper. “The survey results confirm that responsible commercial wind development activities in these Wind Energy Areas will not adversely affect protected species populations.”

“This is an important step in the responsible development of offshore wind,” said State Senator Benjamin Downing (D-Pittsfield). “We can and will preserve and protect marine life, while developing clean energy to tackle climate change.”

“These two studies contain important data showing the state can move forward on several clean energy initiatives that will not have an adverse impact on marine wildlife or the environment,” said House Minority Leader Bradley H. Jones, Jr. (R-North Reading).

“In addition to our state’s world leading technological resources, we also have renewable energy generating capacities that are both environmentally sustainable and economically viable,” said Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr (R- Gloucester).  “Coastal communities will benefit from our ability to further develop off-shore wind production and this is particularly gratifying when we know there is science-based research intended to minimize impact on marine life.  Conscientious efforts to prevent risk to species coupled with a decrease in our production of harmful greenhouses gases is environmental stewardship that helps us all.”

“I want to thank the MassCEC and the BOEM for their work on these valuable studies,” said State Senator Anne Gobi (D-Spencer). “Offshore wind power is an integral piece of the clean energy puzzle in the Commonwealth, and these studies will allow us to move closer to making it a reality.”

“As we develop renewable energy sources in the Commonwealth, I am proud to know that our federal and state bodies are maintaining the shared responsibility to protect our wildlife,” said State Representative Paul Schmid III (D-Westport), House Chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture. “Offshore wind has serious potential for benefits here in Massachusetts, and I look forward to a more efficient permitting process thanks to these studies.”

BPS Calls for Community Input with Release of Long-Term Financial Plan Report

BPS Calls for Community Input with Release
of Long-Term Financial Plan Report
Long Term Financial Plan Advisory Committee Proposes 10 Ideas to Reallocate Resources to Benefit Boston Public Schools Students and Achieve Financial Stability District-wide
Boston, MA - Tuesday, October 25, 2016 - The Boston Public Schools today called for community input with the release of "Investing in Student Success: 10 Big Ideas to Unlock Resources in Boston Public Schools," a report on the district's financial future which aims to provide transparency, accountability, and efficiency to the BPS long-term financial planning process. The ideas presented in the report were developed by an advisory committee of key stakeholders over the course of the last year. At a breakfast hosted by EdVestors, Superintendent Tommy Chang was joined by a host of thought leaders in education, policy, and finance to discuss the report and launch the start of a community conversation.

"This report is a courageous step towards financial stability for our schools and deep investments in our students," said Superintendent Tommy Chang. "The Long-Term Financial Plan Advisory Committee was willing to take a more focused look at large, structural issues that constrain our public education system. These efforts could result in the reallocation of significant dollars. BPS along with our community stakeholders will work together to consider how to move this work forward and to provide students with even greater learning opportunities - the best this country has to offer."

BPS Chief Financial Officer Eleanor Laurans and Assistant to the Superintendent Erika Giampietro presented an overview of the report, which was then followed by a panel discussion, which included: Dr. Andres Alonso, Professor of Practice at Harvard University Graduate School of Education and former CEO of Baltimore City Public Schools; Michelle Wu, President of the Boston City Council; Dr. Naia Wilson, Headmaster of New Mission High School; Gordonia Cundiff, a BPS parent; and Dr. Tom Hehir, Professor of Practice at Harvard University Graduate School of Education and former Director of the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Special Education Programs.

School Committee Chairperson Michael O'Neill, a seasoned financial services professional who served on the advisory committee, said, "Every single child in BPS deserves a top-notch education, yet limitations on spending could cause strains on opportunities if changes are not made. The advisory committee worked hard to develop these ideas for the community to consider and evaluate in collaboration with Boston Public Schools. This is the beginning of a conversation about how we're going to better position our district to provide the education our kids deserve."

The report provides an overview of the areas of the budget which have contributed to financial pressure: transportation, salaries and benefits, the district footprint, special education services, and state and federal funding. The report also examines expected future challenges in the absence of change, estimating that costs would rise $20-$25M per year more than revenue would rise.  

The options identified by the advisory committee could unlock more than $100M in annual savings to reinvest and address rising costs. More information and community dialogue opportunities will be listed at bostonpublicschools.org/financialplan.

The ideas are as follows:

#1: Reduce long-distance BPS Transportation by Adjusting Student Assignment Policy

In 2012, BPS moved from a 3-zone student assignment system to a home-based assignment system which over time will reduce transportation costs. However, cost reductions from this reform are currently limited for two reasons: First, there is a delay in the time it will take to realize the full savings of home-based assignment given that current students (and their siblings) are "grandfathered" into their current schools. Second, the former 3-zone student assignment system is only one of several reasons that students are assigned to schools far from home. In addition, the district also supports a number of specialized programs that draw students from across the city. Looking for ways to address these causes could result in significant savings.

#2: Adopt State-Mandated Transportation Eligibility Distances

Currently, the provision of BPS transporta­tion is more generous than the requirements set forth in state law. BPS provides yellow-bus transportation to any kindergarten or elementary school student who lives more than a mile away from school and to any sixth-grader who lives more than a mile and a half from school (state law requires K-6 transportation only for students who live two miles or more from school). Addi­tionally, BPS offers transportation services to students in grades 7-12 who live two miles or more from school, which is not required under state law, except for students requiring transportation as part of their IEP accommodations. BPS could, with School Committee approval, change this policy to only offer transportation to students in grades K-6 living either 1.5 or 2 miles away from their school (vs. 1 mile).


#3: Maximize Efficiencies in Transportation

In order to increase efficiencies, the com­mittee prioritized the following potential changes: 1) better balancing school start times so fewer buses are needed on the road, 2) clarify which students do not need transportation, and 3) expand transporta­tion options for students who live far from school. The following ideas also warrant exploration: shifting to two bell times, increasing students' maximum route time, increasing walk to stop distances, "linking" schools, and exploring a "hub and spoke" model.

#4: Reconfigure the district's footprint (i.e. grade alignment, class sizes, etc.)

Running underutilized schools across a variety of grade configurations is costly; add in a plethora of programming and city-wide enrollment patterns and it creates a system with classrooms that are not full. BPS can concentrate resources to offer richer programming at fewer sites by making ad­justments to: 1) the number of total schools, 2) the number of locations at which certain programs are offered, and 3) the meth­odology used for student assignment and enrollment projections, which link closely to the coherence of grade configurations across schools. For all of these changes to occur, decisions must be made based on reliable, accurate data that reflects school capacity, student demand, and assessments of equity by neighborhood.

#5: Examine teacher wages and extended school days

While teacher salaries across the country have declined or remained flat in real terms over the last few years, teacher salaries in Boston have increased (teachers made an average of $91K in fiscal year 2017). Today, the average teacher in Boston makes more than national or neighboring districts. The district, in partnership with the Boston Teachers Union, could make adjustments both to the rate of growth of the wage schedule and to the terms of implementing extended learning time. If the next contract were similar to the terms of the current contract, we would expect annual costs to increase ~$50M within three years.

#6: Advocate to Change Tenure Law

Three years ago, BPS implemented an early hiring initiative aimed at giving school leaders greater ability to choose the staff employed in their classrooms through mutual consent hiring. While the program has had many successes, it remains expensive because, based on state law, teachers who do not secure a position are still owed a salary, costing the district $10-$15M annually. If the Massachusetts Legislature were to amend this law, the savings would be significant.

#7: Ensure Appropriate Student Special Education Identification and Administration Support

When considering changes in Special Education, where BPS' highest need and most vulnerable students are served, BPS always considers changes through the lens of serving students better and more efficiently. The changes considered in this category are focused on ways in which BPS can consider redirecting current dollars to better serve students in the most inclusive environments. They include strategies such as prioritizing tiered interventions to best serve all students, improving identification and placement practices, clarifying guide­lines for assigning and removing additional supports for students as needed, and considering alternative models for special education administration.

#8: Streamline Central Office

Amid difficult budget cycles, BPS seeks to protect school budgets as much as possible. For this reason, historically the district has focused reductions in central office and will continue to look for opportunities to do so. At 6% of the overall budget, the opportunity here will be limited in size, but exploring this closely will be critical. One specific opportunity is paid administra­tive leave, ensuring that all cases are being handled appropriately and expediently. In addition, BPS is looking closely at the cen­tral office organization structure and assess­ing each function, the extent to which is it effectively supporting schools, and whether it can be performed more efficiently.

#9: Advocate to Realign State Education Formulas

The Massachusetts' charter school finance model is broken for Boston. There are two possible areas of advocacy at the state level. First, we can advocate to create a reliable transition funding mechanism (Charter Reimbursement). Second, we can advocate to adjust state education formulas and the city's charter school assessment to recognize the true cost of the highest need students.

#10: Advocate to Give Boston More Flexibility to Modify its Revenue Structure

Boston's revenue sources and growth are lim­ited by Proposition 2 ½ and State Law. Bos­ton doesn't have the legal ability to impose broad based sales or income taxes, unlike many cities outside of Massachusetts. It is also limited in its ability to raise excise taxes such as motor vehicle, room occupancy and aircraft fuel. As net state aid is declining and Boston generates nearly one-fifth of state tax revenues (2014), we should advocate that Boston is given more flexibility to modify its revenue structure.