網頁

星期二, 7月 14, 2020

AG HEALEY: UBER AND LYFT DRIVERS ARE EMPLOYEES UNDER MASSACHUSETTS WAGE AND HOUR LAWS

AG HEALEY: UBER AND LYFT DRIVERS ARE EMPLOYEES UNDER MASSACHUSETTS WAGE AND HOUR LAWS
Files Lawsuit to Ensure Drivers Have Access to Minimum Wage, Overtime, Earned Sick Time and other Benefits

BOSTON ­– Attorney General Maura Healey today announced a lawsuit seeking a court ruling that Uber and Lyft drivers are employees under Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, a designation that will allow drivers access to critical labor rights and benefits, such as minimum wage, overtime, and earned sick time. 

            In the complaint for declaratory judgment, filed in Suffolk Superior Court against Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., AG Healey seeks a determination from the court that Uber and Lyft drivers are employees, not independent contractors as the companies have misclassified them. The AG’s complaint also seeks an order declaring that these drivers are entitled to protections under the Wage and Hour Laws.

“Uber and Lyft have built their billion-dollar businesses while denying their drivers basic employee protections and benefits for years,” said AG Healey. “This business model is unfair and exploitative. We are seeking this determination from the court because these drivers have a right to be treated fairly.”  

The AG’s Office alleges that Uber and Lyft are unable to meet a three-part test under state law that would allow them to classify drivers as independent contractors. In Massachusetts, a worker who provides any service for another party is presumed to be an employee and may not be classified as an independent contractor unless that party can prove:
·      The worker is free from their direction and control;
·      The services the worker performs are outside the usual course of their business; and,
·      The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as the service performed for the party.

According to the AG’s complaint, Uber and Lyft drivers are not free from the companies’ direction and control. Drivers must enter into standardized service agreements that set the companies’ non-negotiated terms and conditions, performance standards, and forced arbitration provisions that prevent drivers from bringing private litigation to enforce their rights under the state Wage and Hour Laws. Uber and Lyft claim drivers set their own schedules and may choose to work as many or as few hours as they wish, yet they closely monitor drivers’ activities through their apps and offer financial incentives to induce drivers to work shifts that directly benefit the companies. Uber and Lyft may also penalize drivers for not accepting enough rides, cancelling too many rides, failing to maintain customer satisfaction ratings, or engaging in any conduct the companies determine to be grounds for suspension or termination. Uber and Lyft also unilaterally determine their drivers’ pay structure, which is calculated using complicated formulas that change frequently.

The AG’s complaint asserts that Uber and Lyft drivers provide a service that is essential to the companies’ core business as transportation service providers, and without their drivers, these companies would cease to exist. Moreover, Uber and Lyft drivers are not engaged in an independently established occupation or business. The drivers are not true independent entrepreneurs with the ability to grow their businesses using their individual abilities, and Uber and Lyft directly rely on and benefit from their fare volume under the companies’ required fee-splitting arrangements.

            By misclassifying drivers as independent contractors, Uber and Lyft deny their drivers basic protections under the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws. Many drivers are not even guaranteed the state minimum wage or overtime because the companies don’t pay them for time spent between rides or reimburse them for necessary business expenses such as fuel, vehicle maintenance, and insurance. The companies only recently began offering drivers temporary paid leave due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but even these new policies fail to comply with the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law. And drivers who think they were wrongly suspended or terminated cannot challenge those actions in court because their service agreements require them to go to arbitration.

Uber and Lyft both generate billions of dollars of revenue each year. The companies announced plans to spend $100 million to upend a California law that protects workers from misclassification. Yet these companies deny their drivers access to the most basic wage protections under state laws.

            In seeking a declaratory judgment, the AG’s Office asks the court to order Uber and Lyft to reclassify their drivers as employees, making available to them the benefits and protections afforded by the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, including those granted by the Wage Act, Minimum Wage Law, Overtime Law, Earned Sick Time Law, and Anti-Retaliation Statutes.  

The AG’s Office encourages Uber and Lyft drivers who believe their rights under the Wage and Hour Laws have been violated to respond to the AG’s complaint. Read more about the three-part employment status test on the AG’s website. For information about the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, workers may call the Office’s Fair Labor Hotline at (617) 727-3465 or go to the AG’s Workplace Rights website www.mass.gov/ago/fairlabor for materials in multiple languages.

            This matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Karla E. Zarbo, Erin Staab, and Alex Sugerman-Brozan, and Investigator Kevin Shanahan, all of the AG’s Fair Labor Division, and Senior Counsel William W. Porter of the AG’s Office of the State Solicitor.

MASSACHUSETTS AG’S OFFICE LEADS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT SEEKING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION AGAINST NEW VISA RULE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS

MASSACHUSETTS AG’S OFFICE LEADS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT SEEKING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION AGAINST NEW VISA RULE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS
New Rule is a Dramatic and Illegal Reversal from Previous Guidance; Imposes Significant Harms on Students, Schools and Economy

            BOSTON – Today, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s Office is leading a coalition of 18 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to stop a new federal rule that threatens to bar hundreds of thousands of international students from studying in the United States.
           
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), challenges what the attorneys general call the federal government’s “cruel, abrupt, and unlawful action to expel international students amidst the pandemic that has wrought death and disruption across the United States.” Today’s lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop the entire rule from going into effect. 

“The Trump Administration didn’t even attempt to explain the basis for this senseless rule, which forces schools to choose between keeping their international students enrolled and protecting the health and safety of their campuses,” AG Healey said. “Massachusetts is home to thousands of international students who make invaluable contributions to our educational institutions, communities, and economy. We are taking this action today to make sure they can continue to live and learn in this country.”

Today’s lawsuit challenges an abrupt policy change by ICE to reverse guidance issued on March 13 that recognized the COVID-19 public health emergency, provided flexibility for schools, and allowed international students with F-1 and M-1 visas to take classes online for the duration of the emergency. On July 6, ICE announced that international students can no longer live in the United States and take all of their classes online during the pandemic, upending months of careful planning by colleges and universities to limit in-person instruction in favor of remote learning and adapt their coursework for the fall semester, and leaving thousands of students with no other choice but to leave the country.

ICE further demanded that educational institutions advise the federal government by July 15 whether they intend to offer only remote courses in the fall semester, and to certify by August 4 for each of the institutions’ international students that the student’s upcoming coursework this fall will be in person or a “hybrid” of in-person and online learning in order to maintain their visa status. This demand comes not only amidst an ongoing nationwide emergency, but also at a time when many faculty, staff, and students are not on campus and may not even be in the country; students may not even have registered for their classes for the fall; and schools and individual teaching staff members may not yet have determined whether their classes will be held remotely, in person, or a combination.

The lawsuit details the substantial harms that the new rule places on schools and students. It also alleges that the federal government’s actions are arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion because they reverse previous guidance without explanation, input, or rationale – in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act – and fail to consider the need to protect public health and safety amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

The attorneys general say the new rule and abrupt reversal of the previous guidance threatens their states in a number of ways:

  • Fails to consider the health and safety of students, faculty, and staff;
  • Fails to consider the tremendous costs and administrative burden it would impose on schools to readjust plans and certify students;
  • Fails to consider that, for many international students, remote learning in their home countries is not possible;
  • Imposes significant financial harm to schools, as international students pay hundreds of millions of dollars in tuition, housing, dining, and other fees;
  • Imposes harm to schools’ academic, extracurricular, and cultural communities, as international students contribute invaluable perspectives and diverse skillsets; and
  • Forces colleges and universities to offer in-person classes amid a pandemic or lose significant numbers of international students who will either have to leave the country, transfer, or disenroll from the school.

The lawsuit also alleges the new rule imposes significant economic harm by precluding thousands of international students from coming to and residing in the United States and finding employment in fields such as science, technology, biotechnology, healthcare, business and finance, and education, and contributing to the overall economy.

Massachusetts hosts tens of thousands of international students each year – there are currently 77,000 with active student visas – and they are estimated to bring more than $3.2 billion to the economy each year. Massachusetts is home to 92 private colleges and universities and operates 29 public institutions of higher education, including 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and five separate campuses of the University of Massachusetts system.

Today’s lawsuit also includes 40 declarations from a variety of institutions affected by the new rule, including Northeastern University, Tufts University, University of Massachusetts, Boston University, Massachusetts Community Colleges, Massachusetts State Universities, the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in Massachusetts, and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, as well as Rochelle Walensky, a Harvard Medical School professor and chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital.
The lawsuit includes a request for immediate preliminary relief blocking the rule from going into effect while the case is litigated, and the attorneys general have requested a hearing as soon as possible. In a separate lawsuit filed by Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the court will be holding a hearing on Tuesday at 3 p.m.

Joining Massachusetts in today’s lawsuit are the attorneys general from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

            Handling the case for Massachusetts is Chief of AG Healey’s Civil Rights Division Abby Taylor and State Solicitor Bessie Dewar, with assistance from Child and Youth Protection Unit Director Angela Brooks and Assistant Attorneys General Katherine Dirks, Julie Green, Andrew Haile, Abrisham Eshghi, and Elizabeth Nsahlai.

###

Marty Meehan, President, University of Massachusetts 
“UMass stands with our 7,200 international students and fully supports Attorney General Maura’s effort to stop recent efforts by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to send these students back to their home country if their classes are fully online. ICE’s unanticipated action comes as UMass is finalizing complex plans for the fall semester amidst the ongoing public health emergency caused the COVID-19 pandemic. If allowed to take effect, these rules will create costly, confusing and unnecessary hurdles for our international students and our campus communities, place millions of dollars in university revenue at risk, and deprive the Commonwealth’s economy of a valuable source of talent and innovation.”

Ralph Martin, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Northeastern
“We are grateful for the willingness of the Attorney General’s office to protect international students and institutions of higher education from the imposition of the DHS rules that will unnecessarily and unfairly burden international students and universities; the only purpose of these rules is to deter institutions of higher education from providing educational opportunities to international students. The rules are not only unfair, and if allowed to proceed, have the potential to endanger the safety of campus communities during the COVID pandemic.”

Richard Doherty, President, Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in Massachusetts
“This last-minute ruling by ICE has thrown chaos into a thoughtful and thorough planning process by our colleges. It will inflict significant economic and educational harm on our students, it will result in a stunning economic blow to the Commonwealth and it will cause turmoil for the educational plans for hundreds of thousands for international students across the country including the 71,000 students who study at our Massachusetts colleges and universities.”

Robert A. Brown, President of Boston University
“We were shocked at the Department of Homeland Security’s ill-considered guidelines on the enrollment of international students for the fall. The DHS ruling will be severely detrimental to the education of thousands of international students and will cause long-term damage to the world’s view of our country and our openness to talented students from everywhere. Boston University strongly supports Attorney General Healey’s legal efforts to stop these harmful new rules from going into effect.”

Mary Jeka, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at Tufts University
“The new guidance from ICE is unexpected, unreasonable, and unjust, creating monumental and, in many cases, insurmountable challenges for both students and universities. We fully support Attorney General Healey’s fight on behalf of our international students and join her in calling for a halt to the implementation of this deeply flawed policy.”

Tom Sannicandro, Director of the Massachusetts Association of Community Colleges
“We have been overwhelmed by the support shown to our international students in the face of this egregious, irresponsible, and cruel policy. Our students deserve to continue their higher education journeys without fear for their health or deportation in the middle of a global pandemic – a crisis that is far from over. We are grateful for Attorney General Healey’s urgency on this issue, and she has the full support of the Massachusetts Community Colleges as she moves forward with this legal action.”

Vincent Pedone, Executive Director, Massachusetts State Universities Council of Presidents
“The directive that changes course on student immigration visas in the middle of a global pandemic is nothing more than an attempt to force schools to open regardless of safety and it is plain wrong. The state universities of Massachusetts are proud to support Attorney General Healey’s lawsuit to stop this ill-advised and callous action.”

James E. Rooney, President & CEO, Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce
“International students strengthen our communities with their diverse perspectives, unique talents and skills, and substantial contributions to the Greater Boston economy. We are grateful for AG Healey’s actions today to support these students and ensure that they can continue to live, work and advance their education in Massachusetts.”

Rochelle P. Walensky, Chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and Professor at Harvard Medical School

“Colleges and universities in Massachusetts and nationwide are feverishly working to create plans – specific to their size, location and community disease activity – to keep their students, faculty and staff safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Forcing in-person instruction – or else these institutions risk losing the bidirectional, rich, academic culture that international students offer – poses a threat to the safety that schools are striving so hard to maintain.”

九月三十日前波士頓市暫停塑膠袋禁用令

MAYOR WALSH ANNOUNCES ORDINANCE ALLOWING PLASTIC BAGS EXTENDED TO SEPTEMBER 30
BOSTON - Tuesday, July 14, 2020 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh today announced the City of Boston's executive order to exempt all establishments from the plastic bag ban ordinance will stay in place until September 30. This transition period will allow stores to use up any single-use plastic bags that they have purchased during the emergency. The five-cent per bag fee will also not be in effect.
"In March, we suspended the City's ban on plastic bags and the 5-cent fee for paper bags in order to give both stores and customers more flexibility during this difficult time," said Mayor Walsh. "While we're extending that suspension to best serve businesses and residents, I want to be clear that the Boston Public Health Commission and the state Department of Public Health have said that reusable bags are safe and people should feel free to use them."
On October 1, all provisions of the plastic bag ban ordinance will come back into effect. This includes the elimination of most single-use plastic bags and the requirement for the five-cent fee. The ordinance still allows the ISD Commissioner to grant exemptions on a case-by-case basis. Residents in Boston are now able to use reusable bags if they would like to.
More information about the City's plastic bag ban is available on boston.gov. The City's previous guidance on allowing plastic bags during the COVID-19 health emergency is available on boston.gov.

星期一, 7月 13, 2020

Baker-Polito Administration Announces COVID-19 Funding for Special Education Programs

Baker-Polito Administration Announces COVID-19 Funding for Special Education Programs
$16.1 million will support COVID-19 relief funding

BOSTON – Today, the Baker-Polito Administration announced $16.1 million in relief for 32 special education residential school providers to support costs related to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Throughout the pandemic, special education residential schools remained open to support their students with unique challenges. Schools incurred unanticipated costs related to the purchase of personal protective equipment (PPE), infection control measures, increased staffing costs and enhanced cleaning protocols.

The funding announced today is in addition to $3 million in funding the Department of Early Education and Care (EEC) provided in April to support the residential education school system. Together, this $19 million acknowledges the efforts of these schools to remain open on a 24/7 basis throughout the pandemic and the measures they implemented to keep their doors open and their youth and staff safe.

Earlier in the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Executive Office of Health and Human Services implemented $139 million in increased funding through its existing system for residential and congregate care services providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The funds were used for increased staffing, enhanced infection control procedures and personal protective equipment (PPE).

Due to the structure of the special education residential schools, they were not eligible for this earlier rate increase, but today’s announcement will bring them in line with the previous rate increases provided to other residential and congregate care providers.

To support Special Education programs, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has released Comprehensive Special Education Guidance for the 2020-21 School Year. The Initial Fall Reopening Guidance asks schools and districts to prioritize and begin planning for in-person instruction, while simultaneously preparing blueprints for both remote learning and a hybrid school model (a combination of in-person and remote learning), should local conditions change this school year. This document complements the Initial Fall Reopening Guidance by providing further information on supporting students with disabilities during the upcoming school year. It also provides necessary information in support of schools and districts, as they develop the portion of their reopening plans specifically related to special education. Earlier, DESE released its extended school year guidance to allow for special education day programs to open last week.

The total relief funding by provider is below:

Organization
Relief Funding
Amego, Inc.
                                                 220,552
Archway, Inc.
                                                    45,745
Boston Higashi School, Inc.
                                                 812,699
Brandon Residential Treatment Center, Inc.
                                                 114,578
Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc.
                                                 416,342
Chamberlain International School
                                                 223,922
Crystal Springs, Inc
                                                 513,850
Devereux Foundation
                                                 329,687
Doctor Franklin Perkins School
                                                 378,350
Evergreen Center Inc.
                                              1,087,973
Fall River Deaconess Home
                                                    28,353
Hillcrest Educational Center Inc.
                                              1,275,323
Italian Home for Children
                                                 273,360
JRI
                                                 952,338
Judge Rotenberg Educational Center, Inc.
                                              1,763,017
Latham Centers, Inc.
                                                 393,634
League School of Boston Inc.
                                                 154,355
MAB Community Services
                                                    88,364
McAuley Nazareth
                                                    18,220
Melmark New England, Melmark Inc.
                                                 629,220
New England Center for Children
                                              1,902,742
Perkins School for the Blind
                                                    23,317
St. Ann's Home, Inc
                                              1,081,950
Stetson School, Inc.
                                                 419,099
Stevens-Children's Home
                                                    88,116
The Guild for Human Services, Inc.
                                                 844,602
The Home for Little Wanderers
                                                 131,051
The Learning Center For The Deaf, Inc.
                                                 154,850
The May Institute, Inc.
                                              1,006,071
Walker, Inc.
                                                 150,910
Wayside Youth & Family Support Network, Inc.
                                                 211,454
Whitney Academy
                                                 465,755
Total
                                           16,199,797