網頁

星期三, 7月 15, 2020

波士頓僑界歡送經文處長徐佑典,僑教中心主任歐宏偉

波士頓僑界歡送經文處處長徐佑典(中),僑教中心主任歐宏偉(右),
歡迎新到任僑教中心主任潘昭榮。(周菊子攝)
                (Boston Orange周菊子綜合報導)2020年,礙於新型冠狀病毒(COVID-19)疫情,波士頓僑界不得不放棄在酒樓舉辦大型聚會的傳統,分別在網上,保持社交安全距離的戶外現場,了好幾遍驪歌,歡送715日返台述職的駐波士頓台北經濟文化辦事處處長徐佑典,波士頓僑教中心主任歐宏偉。
波士頓經文處處長徐佑典,杜麗雲夫婦出席網路歡送會。(周菊子攝)
             波士頓辦事處(TECO Boston)自從1980年代增設僑教中心以來,處長和僑教中心主任同日離任,恐怕這還是第一次。在COVID-19疫情擾亂了他們的班機行程後,徐處長和歐主任現在將同機出發。                                       返台後,徐佑典將轉任北美司司長,歐宏偉將回到僑委會綜合規劃處。下一任的波士頓經文處處長是高徐佑典三屆的政大學長孫儉元,預定728日到任,接任的僑教中心主任潘昭榮已於711日抵達。
              712日晚在康麗雪,藍凡耘,許佑湉,蘇皓瑋,林致中等年輕人的籌畫下,有波士頓台灣電影節,波士頓口罩隊,波士頓台灣同鄉會,紐英崙中華專業人員協會,紐英崙玉山科技協會,波士頓台灣人生物科技協會,波士頓台灣龍舟隊等十數個團體,逾百人報名參加歡送徐佑典處長的網路聚會,分別送上殷切祝福,誠懇感謝 。
部分出席者在網路上的合影。(主辦單位提供)
由曾任哈佛大學同學會會長的藍凡耘,徐佑湉做主持,紐英崙玉山科協會長蘇皓瑋播放照片集錦,以蔡翰寧所繪製,神似真人的徐佑典畫像做海報的這網路歡送會,甚至還有波士頓交響樂團有史以來的首名華裔首席助理指揮張宇安夫婦,儘管目前人在柏林,都因為和徐佑典,杜麗雲夫婦有知遇之交感情,撐著時差來參加,還有徐處長大學時期的學長出來透露,當年的徐處長靦典,話不多。胡宗南將軍的孫女胡士慧感謝處長的關照。波士頓口罩隊更指出,杜麗雲不辭辛勞,親自出馬當義工,協助運送其他義工縫製的布口罩,讓他們士氣大振。整個歡送會十分溫馨。
紐英崙中華公所主席鄭慧民(右三),英文書記阮鴻燦(右二),行政主任朱蘇珊(右一),
財政余寶愛(左一),核數張青梅(左二),司儀黃元輝(左三)等人代表中華公所送銀盃給
波士頓經文處處長徐佑典(中)。(周菊子攝)
                    713日中午有紐英崙中華公所安排的歡送會,下午是波士頓經文處內部的送舊迎新會,同時歡迎新到的波士頓僑教中心主任潘昭榮,以及原任舢舨編輯,現加入經文處員工行列的黃靈美。晚上在郊區的玉園,波克萊台灣商會安排了一場包括嘉賓只有12人,分兩桌坐的小型餐敘。
               紐英崙中華公所主席鄭慧民,妻子來自台灣。他表示,二年前才認識徐處長,只見他風度翩翩,文采飛揚。和二度在波士頓擔任僑教中心主任的歐宏偉,就認識將近廿年了,這麼多年都一樣朝氣蓬勃,年輕有為。如今惜別,十分不捨,期盼將來台灣再聚,延續友誼。
紐英崙至德三德公所主席群,右起,黃周麗桃,翁宇才,周樹昂,曹品慈(左一)
送紀念品給波士頓經文處長徐佑典。(周菊子攝)
鄭慧民率同中華公所幹部,阮鴻燦,張青梅,余寶愛,以及行政主任朱蘇珊等人代表中華公所送給徐佑典,歐宏偉各一個銀盃,笑說不敢送金飯碗,所以贈銀盃,祝福他們兩人前程似錦。
                        麻州州長議會第六區議員Terrence W. Kennedy,波士頓市議會議員愛德華費林,這天分別送上了麻州州長查理貝克(Charlie Baker)和波士頓市議會的表揚狀。
            波士頓至德三德公所,華裔退伍軍人會,中華書法會,紐英崙婦女新運會,紐英崙余風采堂,紐英崙朱沛國堂,伍胥山公所,波士頓國民黨等紛紛送上紀念品,詩詞,書法作品。
波克萊台灣商會歡送徐佑典處長,歐宏偉主任。(商會提供)
                      中華書法會兩名會長黃周麗桃和林卓培送上的一幅書法,寫了惟大英雄能本色,事真名士自風流。婦女新運會會長張青梅等人送上愛國者隊11號球衣一件。朱沛國堂的朱紹昌特地撰詩一首,今日唱離歌,明朝動客愁,常陰留盛德,官位上層樓,北美山河好,台灣景物優,波城君記取,無處不風流
            三名前後任波士頓僑務委員,陳家驊,蔣宗壬,梅錫銳,紐英崙至孝篤親公所元老陳世維,主席陳文棟,波士頓洪門致公堂主席湯偉業,前主席余麗媖,黃國威等人也紛紛和處長,歐主任合影,留個紀念。
紐英崙客家鄉親會在香滿園歡送會經文處處長徐佑典。(客家會提供)
駐波士頓經文處同仁歡送徐佑典處長,歐宏偉主任。(周菊子攝)
713日之前,其實還有兩場私下舉辦的歡送會。78日有新英格蘭台灣商會會長李苡惠發起,邀得新英格蘭台灣青年商會,波克萊台灣商會的首次把本地三個台商會聚在一起,再加上他們在廚藝美食巡迴展中合作愉快的慈濟功德會波士頓聯絡處,波士頓三佛中心聯合籌辦的網路歡送會。由於多人同時又是其他社團的主要幹部,於是璞石中華文化協會,台大校友會,政大校友會,成大校友會,勒星頓中文學校,麻州中部中文學校等等,全在歡送行列中掛出團隊組織名了。李苡惠表示,這場歡送會有林才民,莊保羅,歐怡君等年輕一輩參與策畫,編排,又有多名璞石會員感念處長夫人杜麗雲為該會做義工,場面格外溫馨。
紐英崙客家鄉親會也在會長宋玉琴策畫下,早在73日就在香滿園為徐佑典處長舉辦了一場有10餘人出席的歡送會,還特地製作了一輯照片集錦,回顧徐佑典二年任期內的點點滴滴。
徐佑典在各場歡送會中都感謝波士頓僑胞長久以來對中華民國,對台灣的支持,愛護,私下也和經文處同仁說,作為外交人員,已經習慣關上一頁,打開一頁的不斷翻頁人生,但過去這兩年,的確很精彩,讓他體會到駐外代表處和地方辦事處的不同,更實際明白民間力量可以有多大,外交不只可以從政治角度出發,波士頓新設的科技組,就由於組長謝水龍的豐富經驗,讓他接觸到更多資源。他很感激經文處同仁的努力,在新型冠狀病毒期間,藉由政府和民間社團的合作,贈送80多萬片口罩給新英格蘭各地的醫療機構,組織,讓台灣被更多人見到,認識,並留下好印象。徐佑典請僑胞們回台灣時,記得要找他,請經文處同仁們申請調北美司,以期再續前緣。

星期二, 7月 14, 2020

BOSTON POLICE REFORM TASK FORCE ANNOUNCES SERIES OF LISTENING SESSIONS

BOSTON POLICE REFORM TASK FORCE ANNOUNCES SERIES OF LISTENING SESSIONS
Mayor, task force seek community feedback on police reform in the City of Boston
BOSTON - Tuesday, July 14, 2020 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh and the Boston Police Reform Task Force today announced a series of listening sessions to gather community feedback related to police reform in four areas: implicit bias training, body worn cameras, Boston's existing police review board, and use of force policies. This input will guide the Task Force as it performs its duties of reviewing the Boston Police Department's policies and practices and recommending reform measures.

"We're going to provide opportunities for robust public input and community leadership in our work to advance racial justice in Boston," said Mayor Walsh. "I've pledged to continue the conversation on racism as a city--not in a top-down manner, but by centering the voices of the Black and Brown communities who have been the most severely impacted. That is the purpose of the Boston Police Reform Task Force that we have appointed."
Last month, Mayor Walsh signed the "Mayor's Pledge" issued by the Obama Foundation's My Brother's Keeper Alliance as one of the strategies to address racism as an emergency and public health crisis. The Mayor commited the City of Boston to review police use of force policies; engage communities by including a diverse range of input experiences and stories; report review findings to the community and seek feedback; and reform police use of force policies. The Boston Police Reform Task Force is composed of members from the community, law enforcement, advocacy organizations, and the legal profession, to ensure that these commitments are translated to actions.
Community engagement is an important aspect of the Boston Police Reform Task Force's strategy to gather information that accurately reflects the needs of the City and make effective recommendations for police reform. Hosting these community conversations to collect testimony from members of the public will help to better inform their work. At the end of these sessions, the Task Force will submit their initial recommendations by August 14, 2020. Those recommendations will have a two-week public comment period before the final recommendations are submitted to Mayor Walsh no later by September 14, 2020.
"An important part of our work as a task force on police reform is to hear the thoughts and ideas from those served by the Boston Police Department," said Chairman of the Boston Police Reform Task Force Wayne Budd. "The Task Force members strongly believe that this community input will be of invaluable assistance as we formulate our recommendations on police reform to Mayor Walsh."
Residents are encouraged to share their experiences on any of the four topics being covered:
Testimony can be submitted in any language either written or via the WebEx listening sessions. Residents who are unable to testify live can submit written testimony prior to, or after, the listening sessions by emailing BPDTaskforce@boston.gov. More information on how to participate can be found on boston.gov/ending-racism.
Members of the Boston Police Task Force include: Chairman Wayne Budd, former U.S. Attorney for the District of Massachusetts; Allison Cartwright, Attorney in Charge at the Roxbury Public Defender's Office; Joseph D. Feaster, Jr., Chairman of the Board, Urban League of Eastern Massachusetts; Tanisha Sullivan, President of the NAACP Boston Branch; Darrin Howell, President of DRIVE Boston Community Resources Inc. & Political Coordinator for 1199SEIU; Boston Police Superintendent Dennis White, Chief of Staff; Marie St. Fleur, former Massachusetts State Representative; Rev. Jeffrey Brown, Associate Pastor at the Historic Twelfth Baptist Church in Roxbury; Boston Police Sergeant Eddy Chrispin, President of the MA Association of Minority Law Enforcement Officers, Inc.; Javier Flores, Partner at Dinsmore & Shohl, LLPand Jamarhl Crawford, Boston resident.
The Boston Police Department has recently reviewed their Use-of-Force policies and procedures, and implemented recommendations by 8 Can't Wait and the Ethical Policing is Courageous (EPIC) Peer Intervention Program into their existing rules.

Governor Baker Appoints Worcester County Sheriff Lew Evangelidis to New Term On Massport Board

Governor Baker Appoints Worcester County Sheriff Lew Evangelidis to New Term On Massport Board


BOSTON – Governor Charlie Baker today announced the appointment of Worcester County Sheriff Lewis G. Evangelidis to the seven-member Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) Board of Directors. Sheriff Evangelidis was initially appointed to the Massport board in 2015 and is being re-appointed to serve a new seven-year term. Sheriff Evangelidis currently serves as the Chairman of the Massport board.

“Sheriff Evangelidis has a strong record as a leader in the public safety field and has been a strong addition to the Massport board as a member and its chair,” said Governor Charlie Baker. “I am pleased to appoint him to serve a new term on the board and look forward to his continued contributions as the agency navigates continued challenges related to COVID-19 and beyond.”

“Massport continues to benefit from the leadership of its dedicated board and executive staff, and we thank Sheriff Evangelidis for serving another term as part of that team,” said Lt. Governor Karyn Polito. “We have appreciated Sheriff Evangelidis bringing his perspective to the board over the past five years and look forward to his continued contributions.”

"Since 2015, it has been a great privilege to serve on the Massport Board,” said Worcester County Sheriff & Massport Chairman Lew Evangelidis. “I have enjoyed working closely with the Massport team and our fellow board members during the course of our rapid growth and now during the challenges presented by COVID-19. I appreciate Governor Baker reappointing me to serve a new term and I look forward to my continued responsibilities as its Chairman."

“We are fortunate to have a dedicated public servant like Sheriff Evangelidis as Chairman of our Board,” said Massport CEO Lisa Wieland. “His leadership has guided Massport through periods of rapid growth and unprecedented crises, and will serve the Authority well as we plan for and manage the new normal.”

Evangelidis received a bachelor’s degree in economics from the University of Massachusetts at Amherst in 1983 and received his Juris Doctorate from the Temple University School of Law in 1987. Prior to elected service in Massachusetts, Evangelidis served as an Assistant State Prosecutor in Miami-Dade County, Florida, was an Assistant District Attorney in Suffolk County and worked at the law firm of Pellegrini and Seeley from 2000 through 2010. Evangelidis was elected to the Massachusetts House of Representatives in 2002 and served the 1st District of Worcester for eight years. He was elected Sheriff of Worcester County and has served since January of 2011. He has served on the Massport board since 2015.

Massport is governed by a seven member Board. Five members are appointed by the Governor of Massachusetts and one is appointed by the Massachusetts Port Authority Community Advisory Committee to staggered terms of seven years each. The Secretary of Transportation and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation serves as an ex officio member of the Board. All members serve without compensation. Board members must be residents of Massachusetts.

Massport is a financially independent authority which owns and operates Boston Logan International Airport, the public container and cruise terminals in the Port of Boston, Hanscom Field, Worcester Regional Airport as well as real estate holdings and public parks in Boston. Learn more about Massport

Governor Charlie Baker Announces Appointment of Two New UMass Trustees

Governor Charlie Baker Announces Appointment of Two New UMass Trustees

BOSTON – Governor Charlie Baker today announced the appointment of Robert Lewis, Jr. and Julie M. Ramos Gagliardi to the University of Massachusetts Board of Trustees. The appointments fill the seats vacated by Maria Furman and former Board of Trustees Chairman Henry M. Thomas, III whose terms expired following more than 10 years of service.

Robert Lewis, Jr. is a nationally recognized thought leader, public speaker, social innovator and advocate for urban youth. He currently serves as the founder and Executive Director of the BASE – a nonprofit that combines athletic training and competition with education and career resources to empower student-athletes to achieve their full potential.

Julie M. Ramos Gagliardi is the First Vice President of Corporate Giving and Community Relations at BayCoast Bank. She is a graduate of UMass Dartmouth and earned her MBA from Boston College. Gagliardi is active throughout the SouthCoast, both in her official capacity at BayCoast Bank and personally. Her personal service includes her current role as chair of the Somerset Berkley Regional School Committee.

“I am pleased to appoint Robert Lewis and Julie Gagliardi to the UMass Board of Trustees,” said Governor Charlie Baker. “Robert Lewis is a dedicated leader and fierce advocate for our urban youth, and Julie Gagliardi is a passionate and deeply rooted leader in the SouthCoast with strong ties to her alma mater. I’m confident they will both play an important role in the continued growth of our public university system. I am also thankful to former Chairman Henry Thomas and Maria Furman for their service as trustees and for being an integral part of UMass’s continued future success.”

“We are thrilled to have the insights of both Robert and Julie on our Board and are confident that their input will help us continue to build on our mission of education, research and service to the benefit of our students and our state,” said UMass President Marty Meehan. “Despite the many demands on Governor Baker at this time, we are extremely grateful to him for the careful attention and consideration he gives to these important appointments.”

“As Chairman, I am very pleased to welcome both Julie and Robert to the UMass Board of Trustees and thank Governor Baker for identifying such standout appointees,” said UMass Board of Trustees Chairman Robert Manning. “I look forward to working with these two distinguished leaders to take UMass to even greater heights for the benefit of our students, faculty and staff.”

Chairman Manning and President Meehan also offered praise on outgoing Trustee Maria Furman and Former Board of Trustees Chairman Henry M. Thomas III.

“Henry and Maria reflect the very best of our board and both used their knowledge and talents to ensure that UMass continued to offer a world-class and student-centered education while effectively managing through a challenging fiscal environment,” said Chairman Manning. “They will be greatly missed, but we look forward to their continued engagement with the university in different capacities.”

“As chairman, Henry was an ardent advocate for the university and the students it serves and led our Board during a period of robust growth at UMass,” said President Meehan. “As the former chair of a number of committees, including Administration and Finance, Audit and Academic and Student Affairs, Maria Furman was the driving force behind our efficiency and effectiveness program, which has resulted in more than $124 million in cost reductions. Their impacts will last for generations.”

Lewis and Gagliardi were sworn in today by Governor Charlie Baker at a ceremony which was attended by UMass President Marty Meehan and UMass Board of Trustees Chairman Robert Manning.

The 22-member UMass Board of Trustees includes 17 members appointed by the Governor and five members are UMass students elected by the student bodies of each of the Amherst, Boston, Dartmouth, Lowell and Medical School campuses.

AG HEALEY: UBER AND LYFT DRIVERS ARE EMPLOYEES UNDER MASSACHUSETTS WAGE AND HOUR LAWS

AG HEALEY: UBER AND LYFT DRIVERS ARE EMPLOYEES UNDER MASSACHUSETTS WAGE AND HOUR LAWS
Files Lawsuit to Ensure Drivers Have Access to Minimum Wage, Overtime, Earned Sick Time and other Benefits

BOSTON ­– Attorney General Maura Healey today announced a lawsuit seeking a court ruling that Uber and Lyft drivers are employees under Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, a designation that will allow drivers access to critical labor rights and benefits, such as minimum wage, overtime, and earned sick time. 

            In the complaint for declaratory judgment, filed in Suffolk Superior Court against Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., AG Healey seeks a determination from the court that Uber and Lyft drivers are employees, not independent contractors as the companies have misclassified them. The AG’s complaint also seeks an order declaring that these drivers are entitled to protections under the Wage and Hour Laws.

“Uber and Lyft have built their billion-dollar businesses while denying their drivers basic employee protections and benefits for years,” said AG Healey. “This business model is unfair and exploitative. We are seeking this determination from the court because these drivers have a right to be treated fairly.”  

The AG’s Office alleges that Uber and Lyft are unable to meet a three-part test under state law that would allow them to classify drivers as independent contractors. In Massachusetts, a worker who provides any service for another party is presumed to be an employee and may not be classified as an independent contractor unless that party can prove:
·      The worker is free from their direction and control;
·      The services the worker performs are outside the usual course of their business; and,
·      The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or business of the same nature as the service performed for the party.

According to the AG’s complaint, Uber and Lyft drivers are not free from the companies’ direction and control. Drivers must enter into standardized service agreements that set the companies’ non-negotiated terms and conditions, performance standards, and forced arbitration provisions that prevent drivers from bringing private litigation to enforce their rights under the state Wage and Hour Laws. Uber and Lyft claim drivers set their own schedules and may choose to work as many or as few hours as they wish, yet they closely monitor drivers’ activities through their apps and offer financial incentives to induce drivers to work shifts that directly benefit the companies. Uber and Lyft may also penalize drivers for not accepting enough rides, cancelling too many rides, failing to maintain customer satisfaction ratings, or engaging in any conduct the companies determine to be grounds for suspension or termination. Uber and Lyft also unilaterally determine their drivers’ pay structure, which is calculated using complicated formulas that change frequently.

The AG’s complaint asserts that Uber and Lyft drivers provide a service that is essential to the companies’ core business as transportation service providers, and without their drivers, these companies would cease to exist. Moreover, Uber and Lyft drivers are not engaged in an independently established occupation or business. The drivers are not true independent entrepreneurs with the ability to grow their businesses using their individual abilities, and Uber and Lyft directly rely on and benefit from their fare volume under the companies’ required fee-splitting arrangements.

            By misclassifying drivers as independent contractors, Uber and Lyft deny their drivers basic protections under the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws. Many drivers are not even guaranteed the state minimum wage or overtime because the companies don’t pay them for time spent between rides or reimburse them for necessary business expenses such as fuel, vehicle maintenance, and insurance. The companies only recently began offering drivers temporary paid leave due to the COVID-19 pandemic, but even these new policies fail to comply with the Massachusetts Earned Sick Time Law. And drivers who think they were wrongly suspended or terminated cannot challenge those actions in court because their service agreements require them to go to arbitration.

Uber and Lyft both generate billions of dollars of revenue each year. The companies announced plans to spend $100 million to upend a California law that protects workers from misclassification. Yet these companies deny their drivers access to the most basic wage protections under state laws.

            In seeking a declaratory judgment, the AG’s Office asks the court to order Uber and Lyft to reclassify their drivers as employees, making available to them the benefits and protections afforded by the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, including those granted by the Wage Act, Minimum Wage Law, Overtime Law, Earned Sick Time Law, and Anti-Retaliation Statutes.  

The AG’s Office encourages Uber and Lyft drivers who believe their rights under the Wage and Hour Laws have been violated to respond to the AG’s complaint. Read more about the three-part employment status test on the AG’s website. For information about the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Laws, workers may call the Office’s Fair Labor Hotline at (617) 727-3465 or go to the AG’s Workplace Rights website www.mass.gov/ago/fairlabor for materials in multiple languages.

            This matter is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Karla E. Zarbo, Erin Staab, and Alex Sugerman-Brozan, and Investigator Kevin Shanahan, all of the AG’s Fair Labor Division, and Senior Counsel William W. Porter of the AG’s Office of the State Solicitor.

MASSACHUSETTS AG’S OFFICE LEADS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT SEEKING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION AGAINST NEW VISA RULE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS

MASSACHUSETTS AG’S OFFICE LEADS MULTISTATE LAWSUIT SEEKING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTION AGAINST NEW VISA RULE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS
New Rule is a Dramatic and Illegal Reversal from Previous Guidance; Imposes Significant Harms on Students, Schools and Economy

            BOSTON – Today, Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s Office is leading a coalition of 18 attorneys general in filing a lawsuit to stop a new federal rule that threatens to bar hundreds of thousands of international students from studying in the United States.
           
The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), challenges what the attorneys general call the federal government’s “cruel, abrupt, and unlawful action to expel international students amidst the pandemic that has wrought death and disruption across the United States.” Today’s lawsuit seeks an injunction to stop the entire rule from going into effect. 

“The Trump Administration didn’t even attempt to explain the basis for this senseless rule, which forces schools to choose between keeping their international students enrolled and protecting the health and safety of their campuses,” AG Healey said. “Massachusetts is home to thousands of international students who make invaluable contributions to our educational institutions, communities, and economy. We are taking this action today to make sure they can continue to live and learn in this country.”

Today’s lawsuit challenges an abrupt policy change by ICE to reverse guidance issued on March 13 that recognized the COVID-19 public health emergency, provided flexibility for schools, and allowed international students with F-1 and M-1 visas to take classes online for the duration of the emergency. On July 6, ICE announced that international students can no longer live in the United States and take all of their classes online during the pandemic, upending months of careful planning by colleges and universities to limit in-person instruction in favor of remote learning and adapt their coursework for the fall semester, and leaving thousands of students with no other choice but to leave the country.

ICE further demanded that educational institutions advise the federal government by July 15 whether they intend to offer only remote courses in the fall semester, and to certify by August 4 for each of the institutions’ international students that the student’s upcoming coursework this fall will be in person or a “hybrid” of in-person and online learning in order to maintain their visa status. This demand comes not only amidst an ongoing nationwide emergency, but also at a time when many faculty, staff, and students are not on campus and may not even be in the country; students may not even have registered for their classes for the fall; and schools and individual teaching staff members may not yet have determined whether their classes will be held remotely, in person, or a combination.

The lawsuit details the substantial harms that the new rule places on schools and students. It also alleges that the federal government’s actions are arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion because they reverse previous guidance without explanation, input, or rationale – in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act – and fail to consider the need to protect public health and safety amidst the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

The attorneys general say the new rule and abrupt reversal of the previous guidance threatens their states in a number of ways:

  • Fails to consider the health and safety of students, faculty, and staff;
  • Fails to consider the tremendous costs and administrative burden it would impose on schools to readjust plans and certify students;
  • Fails to consider that, for many international students, remote learning in their home countries is not possible;
  • Imposes significant financial harm to schools, as international students pay hundreds of millions of dollars in tuition, housing, dining, and other fees;
  • Imposes harm to schools’ academic, extracurricular, and cultural communities, as international students contribute invaluable perspectives and diverse skillsets; and
  • Forces colleges and universities to offer in-person classes amid a pandemic or lose significant numbers of international students who will either have to leave the country, transfer, or disenroll from the school.

The lawsuit also alleges the new rule imposes significant economic harm by precluding thousands of international students from coming to and residing in the United States and finding employment in fields such as science, technology, biotechnology, healthcare, business and finance, and education, and contributing to the overall economy.

Massachusetts hosts tens of thousands of international students each year – there are currently 77,000 with active student visas – and they are estimated to bring more than $3.2 billion to the economy each year. Massachusetts is home to 92 private colleges and universities and operates 29 public institutions of higher education, including 15 community colleges, nine state universities, and five separate campuses of the University of Massachusetts system.

Today’s lawsuit also includes 40 declarations from a variety of institutions affected by the new rule, including Northeastern University, Tufts University, University of Massachusetts, Boston University, Massachusetts Community Colleges, Massachusetts State Universities, the Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in Massachusetts, and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, as well as Rochelle Walensky, a Harvard Medical School professor and chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital.
The lawsuit includes a request for immediate preliminary relief blocking the rule from going into effect while the case is litigated, and the attorneys general have requested a hearing as soon as possible. In a separate lawsuit filed by Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), the court will be holding a hearing on Tuesday at 3 p.m.

Joining Massachusetts in today’s lawsuit are the attorneys general from Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

            Handling the case for Massachusetts is Chief of AG Healey’s Civil Rights Division Abby Taylor and State Solicitor Bessie Dewar, with assistance from Child and Youth Protection Unit Director Angela Brooks and Assistant Attorneys General Katherine Dirks, Julie Green, Andrew Haile, Abrisham Eshghi, and Elizabeth Nsahlai.

###

Marty Meehan, President, University of Massachusetts 
“UMass stands with our 7,200 international students and fully supports Attorney General Maura’s effort to stop recent efforts by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to send these students back to their home country if their classes are fully online. ICE’s unanticipated action comes as UMass is finalizing complex plans for the fall semester amidst the ongoing public health emergency caused the COVID-19 pandemic. If allowed to take effect, these rules will create costly, confusing and unnecessary hurdles for our international students and our campus communities, place millions of dollars in university revenue at risk, and deprive the Commonwealth’s economy of a valuable source of talent and innovation.”

Ralph Martin, Senior Vice President and General Counsel at Northeastern
“We are grateful for the willingness of the Attorney General’s office to protect international students and institutions of higher education from the imposition of the DHS rules that will unnecessarily and unfairly burden international students and universities; the only purpose of these rules is to deter institutions of higher education from providing educational opportunities to international students. The rules are not only unfair, and if allowed to proceed, have the potential to endanger the safety of campus communities during the COVID pandemic.”

Richard Doherty, President, Association of Independent Colleges and Universities in Massachusetts
“This last-minute ruling by ICE has thrown chaos into a thoughtful and thorough planning process by our colleges. It will inflict significant economic and educational harm on our students, it will result in a stunning economic blow to the Commonwealth and it will cause turmoil for the educational plans for hundreds of thousands for international students across the country including the 71,000 students who study at our Massachusetts colleges and universities.”

Robert A. Brown, President of Boston University
“We were shocked at the Department of Homeland Security’s ill-considered guidelines on the enrollment of international students for the fall. The DHS ruling will be severely detrimental to the education of thousands of international students and will cause long-term damage to the world’s view of our country and our openness to talented students from everywhere. Boston University strongly supports Attorney General Healey’s legal efforts to stop these harmful new rules from going into effect.”

Mary Jeka, Senior Vice President & General Counsel at Tufts University
“The new guidance from ICE is unexpected, unreasonable, and unjust, creating monumental and, in many cases, insurmountable challenges for both students and universities. We fully support Attorney General Healey’s fight on behalf of our international students and join her in calling for a halt to the implementation of this deeply flawed policy.”

Tom Sannicandro, Director of the Massachusetts Association of Community Colleges
“We have been overwhelmed by the support shown to our international students in the face of this egregious, irresponsible, and cruel policy. Our students deserve to continue their higher education journeys without fear for their health or deportation in the middle of a global pandemic – a crisis that is far from over. We are grateful for Attorney General Healey’s urgency on this issue, and she has the full support of the Massachusetts Community Colleges as she moves forward with this legal action.”

Vincent Pedone, Executive Director, Massachusetts State Universities Council of Presidents
“The directive that changes course on student immigration visas in the middle of a global pandemic is nothing more than an attempt to force schools to open regardless of safety and it is plain wrong. The state universities of Massachusetts are proud to support Attorney General Healey’s lawsuit to stop this ill-advised and callous action.”

James E. Rooney, President & CEO, Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce
“International students strengthen our communities with their diverse perspectives, unique talents and skills, and substantial contributions to the Greater Boston economy. We are grateful for AG Healey’s actions today to support these students and ensure that they can continue to live, work and advance their education in Massachusetts.”

Rochelle P. Walensky, Chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital and Professor at Harvard Medical School

“Colleges and universities in Massachusetts and nationwide are feverishly working to create plans – specific to their size, location and community disease activity – to keep their students, faculty and staff safe during the COVID-19 pandemic. Forcing in-person instruction – or else these institutions risk losing the bidirectional, rich, academic culture that international students offer – poses a threat to the safety that schools are striving so hard to maintain.”

九月三十日前波士頓市暫停塑膠袋禁用令

MAYOR WALSH ANNOUNCES ORDINANCE ALLOWING PLASTIC BAGS EXTENDED TO SEPTEMBER 30
BOSTON - Tuesday, July 14, 2020 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh today announced the City of Boston's executive order to exempt all establishments from the plastic bag ban ordinance will stay in place until September 30. This transition period will allow stores to use up any single-use plastic bags that they have purchased during the emergency. The five-cent per bag fee will also not be in effect.
"In March, we suspended the City's ban on plastic bags and the 5-cent fee for paper bags in order to give both stores and customers more flexibility during this difficult time," said Mayor Walsh. "While we're extending that suspension to best serve businesses and residents, I want to be clear that the Boston Public Health Commission and the state Department of Public Health have said that reusable bags are safe and people should feel free to use them."
On October 1, all provisions of the plastic bag ban ordinance will come back into effect. This includes the elimination of most single-use plastic bags and the requirement for the five-cent fee. The ordinance still allows the ISD Commissioner to grant exemptions on a case-by-case basis. Residents in Boston are now able to use reusable bags if they would like to.
More information about the City's plastic bag ban is available on boston.gov. The City's previous guidance on allowing plastic bags during the COVID-19 health emergency is available on boston.gov.