星期五, 12月 09, 2022

全國亞裔總商會下一代分會開圓桌會討論「亞裔堅強」之道 (圖片)

ACE NextGen執行顧問蘇宇寅(中立者)主持圓桌會。 (Boston Orange)

ACE NextGen圓桌會議出席者合影。 (Boston Orange)
               (Boston Orange 麻州報導) 全國亞裔總商會 (National ACE) 的下一代分會 (Ace NextGen) ,日前在劍橋市坎德廣場的萬豪酒店舉辦「亞裔堅強圓桌會議」,40多名來自各行各業的小商家齊聚一室,分享經驗,交流意見,為團結亞裔力量努力。

蘇宇寅是雞肉飯傢伙集團創辦人,也是ACE NextGen執行顧問。 (Boston Orange)
               這場圓桌會由全國亞裔總商會的行銷主任Emily FuderACE NextGen執行顧問暨雞肉飯傢伙餐飲集團創辦人蘇宇寅,和創辦Boston Speaks,培訓人們致詞、做簡報能力的Kit Pang主持。

               到會的民代及政府官員有劍橋市市長Sumbul Siddiqui,波士頓市聯邦關係主任Sam Huynh,昆士市市議員梁秀婷 (Nina Liang) ,美國小企業行政局麻州區域主任的Robert Nelson和公共事務專員伍少武 (Norman Eng)等。

Bon Me餐飲集團創辦人鄺樂怡 (Alison Fong) ,Mei Mei餐飲集團創辦人李雄愛 (Irene Li) ,代表贊助商的東方銀行Abby Nguye-BurkeCrew’s顧問公司的人,這天也都在座。

昆士市議員梁秀婷 (Nina Liang) 。 (Boston Orange)

Emily Fuder指出,這是該會今年在全美各地舉辦的第22場小企業圓桌會。她還放映了一段影片,闡述亞裔企業在新冠病毒疫情期間所遭受的經濟衝擊,以及反亞裔仇恨犯罪暴增所帶來的影響。

波士頓市首名聯邦關係主任Sam Hyun表示,自從波士頓市長吳弭上任後,已有更多亞裔在市府中擔任重要職位,勢必能夠幫助亞裔社區和政府有更好互動。亞裔社區必須找出共同處,才能團結起來,不但在聯邦,州,甚至在和市級政府互動時,都能發揮影響力。ACE NextGen所舉辦的這場會議,正是促進亞裔社區團結,橋接政府關係的一次努力。

昆士市議員梁秀婷表示,她們的家族經商,長期參與社區活動,但是在大型土地發展計畫中,卻也總是參與無門,得不到發言機會,這才促成了她的參選昆士市議員,成為市內重大議題的決策聲音之一。她強調,小企業所繳交的稅款是市級政府的收入來源,小企業的選票及經驗都很重要,大家必須積極參與市政,表達意見,才能爭取到更大影響力。

               Robert Nelson說明,小企業行政局的麻州辦公室有11人,透過各種項目,為小企業提供了300億元經費。他鼓勵亞裔企業多加利用該辦公室提供的各項服務。

劍橋市市長Sumbul Siddiqui。 (Boston Orange)

               圓桌會後,出席者分成5個小組,做進一步交流。在討論中,有人提及產假後回公司上班,對員工來說是個不小的問題。美美集團的李雄愛表示,她的經營策略是開方管理,讓每一個員工都像經理一樣思考,幫助他們了解財務,以及公司的經營和決策過程,進而改善了勞資關係。

               圓桌會結束後,轉移場地到劍橋市的谷歌分公司舉行接待會。出席者參觀贊助商擺放的攤位,享用食物卡車及餐廳製作的亞裔口味佳肴。

波士頓市聯邦關係主任Sam Huynh。 (Boston Orange)

美國小企業行政局麻州區域主任Robert Nelson。
(Boston Orange)
東方銀行Abby Nguye-Burke。(Boston Orange)

分組討論。 (Boston Orange)
出席者表達意見。 (Boston Orange)

昆士中學新校舍上樑封頂啦

昆士中學新校舍上樑。 (Boston Orange)

           (Boston Orange 綜合報導) 昆士中學新校址129日上樑封頂,2024竣工啟用後和波士頓華埠社區的加強互動,成為華埠內重要資源,也令人期待。

           昆士中學建新校舍一波多折,歷經10年的推動、計畫,找地,找錢。昆士中學現任校長張可仁在上樑儀式中致詞時指出,這一路走來實在是太艱難了,為了建新校舍,這計畫歷經4位市長,5名市議會議長,7位波士頓公校總監,2名麻州財政長,才終於破土動工,要感謝的人實在太多,在背後默默付出的無名英雄,更是不計其數。

           位於馬津尼路(Marginal Road)和夏利臣街249號交界處,緊鄰西向90號州際公路的昆士中學新校舍,預計耗資19300萬元,樓高6層,供650名學生使用。

           波士頓市長吳弭 (Michelle Wu)也在致詞時感謝促成昆士中學新校舍建案的許多個人、組織,包括波士頓華人浸信佈道會同意了換地,鄰里社區組織參與設計討論,以及許許多多人努力,才把留給昆士中學新校舍的經費多保留一年。

           吳弭市長表示,昆士中學新校舍將士波士頓市內最環保的大樓之一,學校內的所有電力幾乎都將由校內自備的電力系統供應。這校舍還計畫取得LEAD金級證書,採用先進的過濾系統,來保護整個校舍的空氣品質。屋頂的戶外空間,將在天氣許可時,讓老師們帶學生在戶外上課,並充分利用周遭環境給予的機會來做各種項目。波士遁世還很驕傲,這座校舍會有科學級生物學實驗室,一座很漂亮的新體育館,每一個角落空間都可以讓學生充分使用。

部分出席昆士中學新校舍上樑儀式者留影。前左一起為前校長黃伯勳,現任校長張可仁。
(Boston Orange)
           吳弭市長說,這座校舍不但在設計上以學生學習為中心,也考慮到作為社區空間的用途。第一及第二層樓將包括禮堂,餐廳、劇場及體育館和媒體中心,整個社區內的團體及組織,都可借來舉辦活動,因為學校不僅是學生白天學習的地方,也是整個社區的樞紐,不同世代互相連結的地方。

昆士中學新校舍已經有了骨架。 (Boston Orange)
           早前,波士頓市宣佈了波士頓公校的新綠化政策,要翻修全市學校樓宇,跟上21世紀的時代腳步這計畫,讓將是明日領袖的今日學生們都有個安全、美麗、現代的學習環境。她要謝謝大家持續努力,才走到這一步。

           波士頓市公共設施局主任Kerrie Griffin表示,這棟校舍共用了2500噸鋼,3300片鋼鐵,最後一片上樑後,代表這項工程又達成一項巨大里程碑。

波士頓市長吳弭 (Michelle Wu)在封頂橫樑上簽名。(Boston Orange)

           波士頓市議會議長Ed Flynn表示,這計畫歷經萬寧路 (Tom Menino) ,馬丁華殊 (Marty Walsh)Kim Janey,吳弭 (Michelle Wu)4名市長,無數的市府員工及波士頓社區領袖,華埠及南端居民的努力,才終於施工,上樑,是社區大眾的永不放棄,才終於見到成果。

           新任波士頓市公校總監Mary Skipper稱波士頓市很幸運,有個在環保上有遠見的市長,把可持續,強調綠化、節能的理念帶進學校樓宇中,她期待著和社區慶祝新校舍落成。

           昆士中學前任校長,已退休的黃伯勳這天也出席上樑儀式,為他當年在任內積極推動的新校舍計畫,朝向竣工啟用再邁進一步,感到欣慰不已。

昆士中學校長張可仁。 (Boston Orange)
波士頓市議會議長Ed Flynn。 (Boston Orange)
波士頓公校總監Mary Skipper。 (Boston Orange)
昆士中學前校長黃伯勳和波士頓市議員Ruthzez
Louijeune。(Boston Orange)

星期四, 12月 08, 2022

Asian American Civil Rights Groups Applaud Exclusion of Harmful Amendment in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2023

Asian American Civil Rights Groups Applaud Exclusion of Harmful Amendment in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2023

 

Anti-Asian and Anti-Immigrant Senate Amendment Successfully Rejected

 

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Asian American civil rights groups applaud the exclusion of Senate Amendment #5810, the Safeguarding American Innovation Act, from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for FY23. Introduced by Senator Rob Portman, this amendment would have had long standing impacts and ramifications for the broader Asian American and immigrant communities, particularly those of Chinese descent. If included, this amendment would have criminalized disclosures on federal grant applications and subjected immigrants, scientists, researchers and their families to imprisonment, steep civil fines, immigrant visa restrictions, and enduring damage.

 

A coalition of Asian American organizations including Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC (Advancing Justice – AAJC), Asian American Scholar Forum (AASF), Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus (Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus), Asian American Federal Employees for Nondiscrimination (AAFEN), APA Justice, National Council of Asian Pacific Americans (NCAPA), OCA - Asian Pacific American Advocates, and United Chinese Americans (UCA) took action to oppose this amendment and object to its inclusion in the NDAA or any other future legislation.

 

Supported by dozens of other immigrant rights groups, Asian American advocates, and professional organizations, the coalition submitted a formal letter to the offices of House Speaker Pelosi, House Minority Leader McCarthy, Senate Majority Leader Schumer, and Senate Minority Leader McConnell.

 

“We commend the exclusion of this harmful amendment to the proposed NDAA. If adopted, the bill would have perpetuated further harm against the Asian American and immigrant community at a time when systemic racism, and anti-Asian hate are still prevalent in our society,” said John C. Yang, the President and Executive Director of Advancing Justice – AAJC“Even now, Asian American and immigrant scientists, researchers, and scholars, particularly of Chinese descent, face unjust investigations and prosecutions. Advancing Justice – AAJC vows to remain vigilant against all forms of racial profiling, surveillance, and overcriminalization of issues related to research integrity and national security.”

 

Gisela Perez Kusakawa, Executive Director of AASF said, “We are very pleased that Congress listened to the concerns from our communities and did not include this harmful amendment in the National Defense Authorization Act. By opposing this amendment, Asian American Scholar Forum sought to provide a voice to the many academics, researchers, and scholars who reached out to us concerned about the consequences of this amendment on the scientific and academic community, particularly Asian Americans and immigrants. The amendment would have further criminalized Asian Americans and immigrants in this country who are living in fear of retaliation and scapegoating as they try to simply do their jobs and participate in routine academic activities at their institutions. AASF captured these fears in a report that shows that a growing number of Chinese American academics have left the U.S. as a result of fear of conducting routine research and academic activities in the current environment. Our communities should not have to live with the worry of being discriminated against and we all must work toward a more inclusive environment for all.”

 

"Following a surge of community advocacy and concern, the Justice Department announced an end to the controversial China Initiative in February, an important step to ending the profiling of Asians, Asian Americans, and immigrants on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, and religion,” said Hammad Alam, Staff Attorney and National Security & Civil Rights Program Manager at Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus. “In the NDAA or any other legislation, Congress should continue to reject any harmful language that would deny admission or revoke visas of Chinese nationals and others based on innuendo, bad information, and racial targeting. Such language would not only prevent the DOJ from dismantling the initiative but also reestablish its harmful and biased tactics. We're calling on members of Congress to continue to reject any legislative language that subjects Asian American communities to discrimination and profiling that only serves to increase our lived experiences of racism and hate violence.”

 

"We are relieved that the ill-advised Portman Amendment 5810 failed to be added to the FY 2023 NDAA. It would have targeted persons based on race and national origin, especially scientists of Asian descent and specifically Chinese origin. The amendment would irreparably harm American leadership in science and technology." said Dr. Jeremy Wu, Co-organizer of Asian Pacific American Justice Task Force.

 

Gregg Orton, National Director of NCAPA stated, “As a coalition of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) organizations, who have been advocating to combat anti-Asian hate and xenophobia, we commend the work that was done to ensure this harmful amendment was not included in the NDAA. Congress got it right in this case that U.S. China policy must be carefully considered and not result in driving narratives that put targets on the backs of Asian Americans.”

 

"Harmful rhetoric that demonizes groups of people by race and ethnicity does not advance our national security interests,” said Linda Ng, OCA National President. “We can do better as we face the real challenges in the national security realm." 

 

"United Chinese Americans represents thousands of Chinese Americans across the country who have faced rising hate over the past decade, heightened scrutiny, and unjust prosecutions in our own country. Although we commend that this harmful amendment was not included in the NDAA, we remain deeply concerned with the ongoing criminalization of Chinese Americans and immigrants that is exemplified in attempts by those in power to legislate provisions that would result in racial bias and bigotry against Chinese American communities. For far too long the burden for change and prevention of these harmful provisions have been on our shoulders. We call on our policymakers and allies to fight against anti-Chinese sentiment and hate against our communities in all its various forms and iterations," said Haipei Shue, President of UCA.

 

Review the letter to Congressional leadership here.

 

Learn more about the end of the China Initiative here.

 

###

Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC has a mission to advance the civil and human rights of Asian Americans and to build and promote a fair and equitable society for all. Advancing Justice – AAJC launched the Anti-Profiling, Civil Rights and National Security program, formerly known as the Anti-Racial Profiling Project, to combat profiling and protect the rights of Asian Americans and immigrants through policy advocacy, legal referrals, coalition building, and education for policymakers, the media, and the general public.

Asian American Scholar Forum (AASF) promotes academic belonging, openness, freedom, and equality for all and represents more than 7,000 scientists, researchers, and scholars in the U.S.. In response to heightened anti-Asian sentiments in the U.S. and increasing profiling of Chinese Americans and immigrants in science, AASF has been a leading national voice fighting for the rights of Asian American and immigrant scientists, researchers, and scholars.            

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus (ALC) was founded in 1972 as the nation’s first legal and civil rights organization focusing on the needs of low-income, immigrant and underserved Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Recognizing that social, economic, political, and racial inequalities continue to exist in the United States, ALC is committed to the pursuit of equality and justice for all sectors of our society. ALC’s National Security and Civil Rights Program defends communities against unjust national security policies that profile and criminalize families, students, and neighbors, deny people citizenship, educational, and work opportunities, and keep families apart.

 

Asian Pacific American Justice Task Force (APA Justice) is a non-profit, non-partisan platform to build a sustainable ecosystem that addresses racial profiling concerns and to facilitate, inform, and advocate on selected issues related to justice and fairness for the Asian Pacific American community.

 

Based in Washington, D.C., the National Council of Asian Pacific Americans is a coalition of thirty-eight national Asian Pacific American organizations that represent the interests of Asian American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI) communities and to provide a national voice for our communities’ concerns.

 

OCA - Asian Pacific American Advocates embraces the hopes and aspirations of Asian Pacific Americans in the United States, with 30 chapters with national headquarters in Washington, DC.

 

United Chinese Americans (UCA) is a community wide coalition dedicated to the empowering and enriching of Chinese Americans.

AG HEALEY JOINS COALITION TO PROTECT ACCESS TO GENDER-AFFIRMING CARE

 AG HEALEY JOINS COALITION TO PROTECT ACCESS TO GENDER-AFFIRMING CARE 

Brief Supports Transgender Individuals Denied Coverage for Gender-Affirming Care Under West Virginia’s State Medicaid Program

 

            BOSTON – Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey joined a coalition of 13 attorneys general in filing a brief in support of transgender individuals unable to obtain coverage for gender-affirming care under West Virginia’s State Medicaid Program.

 

The brief, filed Wednesday in the case, Fain v. Crouch, argues that the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals should affirm a lower court ruling which determined that the West Virginia State Medicaid Program’s denial of medically necessary, gender-affirming care for transgender individuals violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The states note that Supreme Court rulings have found that discrimination against transgender individuals is discrimination based on sex and therefore a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.

 

“Discriminatory policies like this one deny vulnerable residents lifesaving care,” AG Healey said. “We are calling on the Court to recognize that gender-affirming care is essential health care and to remove this barrier for transgender individuals.”

 

The amicus brief notes the efforts that states joining the filing have made to protect transgender healthcare rights, including prohibiting health care discrimination on the basis of transgender identity and adopting policies that ensure their transgender residents have access to gender-affirming care. These policies have improved the well-being of transgender people, and reduced the risk of suicide, substance abuse, and depression, without meaningfully increasing premium costs or expenses to insurers and plan sponsors.  

The brief is a continuation of AG Healey’s ongoing advocacy for the equal rights of LGBTQI+ individuals. In October, AG Healey joined a coalition of attorneys general in filing an amicus brief in support of transgender individuals and parents of transgender individuals denied coverage for gender-affirming care under the North Carolina State Health Plan for Teachers and State Employees. In January, she joined an amicus brief opposing an Arkansas law that prohibits healthcare professionals from providing transgender teenagers with medically necessary care. In August, AG Healey joined a coalition of attorneys general in filing a brief in support of a 13-year-old Indiana transgender boy who is suing his school district for gender identity discrimination. Also in August, the AG joined a brief opposing an Alabama law criminalizing evidence-based and medically accepted gender-affirming care for transgender young people. In 2017 she joined a similar amicus brief filed with the Supreme Court in support of a transgender student suing his school in Gloucester County, Virginia. In 2016, AG Healey worked closely with advocates, the business community, and transgender families to successfully garner support for the passage of an amendment to Massachusetts’ Public Accommodations Law protecting against discrimination on the basis of gender identity.  

           Joining AG Healey in filing the brief are the attorneys general of Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington and the District of Columbia.