星期一, 3月 07, 2016

逾千公校學生上街頭 抗議教育預算刪減

(Boston Orange 周菊子綜合報導)波士頓公校學生今(7)午踏出校門,走上街頭,抗議政府刪減預算,抱怨教育機會受打擊,未來希望受影響。
            波士頓公校學生響應“奪回我們的學校聯盟(The Alliance to Reclaim Our Schools)”在全美各地發起的抗議政府刪減預算行動,今早11點半起,陸續罷課上街,共有總數逾千的學生聚集到波士頓廣場(Boston Common),高喊口號,舉標語牌,呼籲政府不要刪減他們的未來。
            一部分學生後來還轉往麻州政府大樓,芬紐廳(Faneuil Hall)繼續抗議。
            許多學生擔心政府的刪減預算,將影響他們接受教育的機會,有些人擔心選修課,或外語課會減少,甚至取消;原本的小班上課,將變成大班學習,不同程度的人都得擠在一個班級內上課。
            也有人擔心地鐵學生票會被取消掉,上學開銷每月增加75元左右。
抗議刪減教育經費的團體,諸如波士頓教育正義聯盟(Boston Education Justice Alliance)等,計畫今(7)晚在波士頓學校委員會的聽證會中抗議。他們也抵制麻州的試圖廢除特許學校上限。
波士頓公校總監張欽棠(Tom Chang)為彌平五千萬元的預算短缺,最近提議刪減中央辦公室經費二千萬元,並在依照每名學生計算的預算案中,刪減一千到一千二百萬元。

波士頓市長馬丁華殊(Martin Walsh)辦公室在發出的聲明中表示,儘管麻州政府持續刪減教育補助,波士公校的下學年預算,比今年的增加了1350萬元。



阮氏公所猴年春宴250餘人同歡 麻州財長4眾議員到賀

紐英崙阮氏公所3月6日晚在龍鳳酒樓慶祝猴年新春,250餘人同聚共歡。
出席嘉賓包括麻州財政廳長高柏珂(Deb Goldberg),麻州眾議員黃子安,陳德基,麥家威(Aaron Michlewitz),Jay Livingston,駐波士頓台北經濟文化辦事處處長賴銘琪,副處長陳銘俊,波士頓華僑文教中心主任郭大文,曾任大波士頓中華文化協會會長的冼鳳明等多人。
麻州眾議員黃子安(右一),陳德基(左二)頒發表揚狀,
阮氏公所主席阮鴻燦(右二),阮謝少珍(左一)代表領取。
阮氏公所前任主席阮浩鑾當晚打趣,故意把Goldberg唸成Goonberg,笑這晚高柏柯姓阮,也是宗親,要負責賓。高柏珂也很大方,一連獻唱兩首歌,先唱“All about the Bass”,再和阮氏公所主席阮鴻燦,麻州眾議員麥家威, Jay Livingston等人在阮氏春宴中合唱“甜蜜的卡洛琳”。

Jay Livingston是代表後灣區的麻州眾議員,刻正加入遞補麻州參議員彼楚塞利(Anthony W. Petruccelli) 辭職所遺席缺的特別選舉選戰。轄區包括華埠,2009年當選麻州眾議員迄今的麥家威,因在眾議會中已當上金融服務委員會主席,躍升為重量級眾議員之一,聽取好友勸告,放下了這一機會。 
圖片由阮氏公所主席阮鴻燦提供。



麻州財政廳長高柏珂(左起),阮氏公所主席阮鴻燦,麻州眾議員麥
家威, Jay Livingston等人在阮氏春宴中合唱卡拉OK,甜蜜的卡洛琳。

MAYOR WALSH ACCEPTS TOP LEADERSHIP ROLE FOR INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE GROUP

MAYOR WALSH ACCEPTS TOP LEADERSHIP ROLE FOR INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE GROUP
Mayor Walsh Elected to C40 Cities Climate Leadership Steering Committee for North America
BOSTON - Thursday, March 3, 2016 - Mayor Martin J. Walsh today joined the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40) Steering Committee, the governing body that provides strategic direction for the network of cities on the front line of preparing for and helping prevent climate change. He will serve on the steering committee as the representative for all North American C40 cities.

"Boston has made significant progress on climate action," said Mayor Walsh. "I'm proud and determined to build on and expand that legacy in this new leadership role."

Boston joined C40 in 2014 and has accomplished much in two years - from the release of the updated Greenovate Climate Action, which sets a clear road map to achieve Boston's greenhouse gas reduction goals of 25 percent by 2020 and 80 percent by 2050, to receiving an international award for community engagement at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris.

Read more about Boston's C40 "Smart Cities and Smart Community Engagement" award and why Boston was chosen as the recipient, read hereand here.

As a member of the C40 Steering Committee, Mayor Walsh and the City of Boston will represent C40 in regional forums as well as on the global stage, helping to make the case for urgent and ambitious climate action as cities take on an increasingly important role in delivering global climate goals.

"Mayor Martin J. Walsh of Boston has been officially elected as the new North American Steering Committee member. Mayor Walsh will work alongside our existing Steering Committee member Mayor Garcetti of Los Angeles to represent the 14 North American members," said C40 Chair and Rio de Janeiro Mayor Eduardo Paes. "The Steering Committee is confident and looks forward to Mayor Walsh's leadership in C40's efforts to steer this organization and actively represent North America and C40 as a whole in the global climate change arena."

About the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (C40):
The C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, now in its 10th year, connects more than 80 of the world's greatest cities, representing 600+ million people and one-quarter of the global economy. Created and led by cities, C40 is focused on tackling climate change and driving urban action that reduces greenhouse gas emissions and climate risks, while increasing the health, wellbeing and economic opportunities of urban citizens. To learn more about the work of C40, please visit www.c40.org.  

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT IN MEETING WITH FINANCIAL REGULATORS

REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
IN MEETING WITH FINANCIAL REGULATORS

Roosevelt Room



12:08 P.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT:  I just has an opportunity to meet with our independent financial regulators to discuss the progress that we’ve made on our economy since the financial crisis.  This is something that I’ve done on a regular basis.  It’s worth remembering that it was eight years ago this month that Bear Stearns collapsed.  And that was a key moment in an economic spiral that eventually cost millions of Americans home values, pensions, jobs, savings.  It was devastating. 

And it is a useful reminder of what happens when you have lax regulation on Wall Street -- eventually, it migrates to Main Street.  And so irresponsible, risky bets with inadequate safeguards and that reward executives who take those risks greatly can cause enormous damage to our economy overall. 

As we worked to recover from this crisis, we’ve also worked to prevent this crisis from happening again.  And Wall Street reform -- Dodd-Frank -- the laws that we passed have worked.  I want to emphasize this because it is popular in the media, in political discourse -- both on the left and the right -- to suggest that the crisis happened and nothing changed.  That is not true.  Let me repeat that.  In fact, we went at financial regulation very hard to guard against another era of “too big to fail” and some of the systemic disruptions that occurred because of lax regulation.  It has helped us crack down on irresponsible behavior.  We have seen banks that now have much greater capital -- as much as $700 billion worth of additional capital, additional cushion inside of our financial system.

We have put in place requirements so that if you have a financial institution that is on the brink of collapse, we can engage in an orderly unwinding of that institution without having taxpayers forced to come in and bail it out.  We have made sure that the monitoring and the reporting by these institutions is much more stringent than it used to be.  We are moving in the derivatives sector a huge amount of oversight and regulation.  And now you have clearinghouses that account for the vast majority of trades taking place so that we know if and when somebody is doing something that they shouldn’t be doing, if they’re over-leveraged in ways that could pose larger dangers to the financial system. 

We created a Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that has been very effective in cracking down on some of the dishonest predatory practices that financial institutions were engaging in and that, in part, led to the crisis in 2007 and 2008. 

So I want to dispel the notion that exists both on the left and on the right that somehow, after the crisis, nothing happened.  In fact, if you look at the speech that I gave at Cooper Union in 2008 addressing this issue, we are, by the end of this year, likely to have achieved all the goals that we set out in terms of firming up the financial system and making it much more secure and making sure that some of the excesses, recklessness, and dangers that took place can’t occur in the future.

The second thing that I want to correct for the record is the notion that somehow this would hurt business and the economy.  In fact, the opposite has happened.  Our businesses have created jobs every single month since this law was signed.  Over the past six years, it created more than 15 million new jobs in all. 

And because of Wall Street reform, our financial system is safer and stronger than it was before the crisis.  It is much better equipped to withstand any systemic blows that may occur not just within our borders, but in the international financial system generally.  So we did not just rebuild this, we rebuilt it better and we rebuilt it stronger. 

Now, that doesn’t mean that there’s not still work to
do.  One of the things that we discussed was the fact that there is a shadow banking system -- a set of institutions that under current law aren’t always regulated in the same way that banks are regulated -- hedge funds, asset managers, et cetera.  And one of our projects is to make sure that we are covering some of those potential gaps.  We may need at some point help from Congress to do that.  But in the meantime, the joint committee of these agencies has been working very effectively to try to monitor some of those areas that are outside the traditional banking system. 

     We still have work to do to complete regulations related to executive compensation to make sure that individuals who are working in these financial institutions are less incentivized to take big, reckless risks that could end up harming our financial sector overall. 

     And we also spent a lot of time talking about cybersecurity, an area where there’s going to be increasing vulnerability.  And as part of my Cybersecurity National Action Plan, we have already seen these independent regulators working together with Treasury and with the Department of Homeland Security and other agencies to start tightening up our financial sector and to identify those areas where we might be weak and might be vulnerable.

     So there’s going to continue to be a lot of work to do.  The financial system operates very quickly.  It is innovative.  There is a lot of technology involved.  And so the task for regulators is challenging because it’s a moving target; it doesn’t stay static. 

     But these institutions have worked really hard, and overall, undoubtedly have made our financial system much better.  So when you read articles, whether on the left or the right, that suggest somehow nothing happened and everybody just went back to the same go-go years that they were engaging in before, those are factually incorrect.  They’re not true.  And the reason I want to emphasize that is because when there’s a perception that nothing happened, that that feeds cynicism that actually weakens our ability then to make further progress in regulating this sector. 

A lot of work has been done by a lot of really smart, dedicated people to try to make this system work better.  And we’ve made vast improvements, and we now have to build on that.

The last point I would make -- if there is a significant challenge in terms of regulating Wall Street and regulating our financial sector, it is primarily coming from certain members of Congress who are consistently pressuring independent regulators to back off; who want to strip away the authorities that were granted under Dodd-Frank; who tried to weaken those regulations, tried to water them down; or tried to starve these regulators of the resources and the budgets that they need to hire enough personnel to track everything that’s taking place in the financial sector.

So whether you are a Democrat or a Republican or a Tea Party member or a socialist, if you are concerned about making sure that Wall Street is doing the right thing, check to make sure that your member of Congress is not trying to cut the budgets of these various agencies, starve them of the resources that they need, or roll back some of the authorities that were created during Dodd-Frank. 

That should be the target of your concern and your wrath.  Because unless we have strong, independent agencies like this that can provide the oversight that’s necessary, it is absolutely true that these financial institutions with enormous resources and mountains of lawyers and accountants and analysts will run circles around the government and will end up engaging once again in the kinds of disruptive behavior that caused so much damage to so many people in the first place.  So that’s where everybody should be focused. 

And let’s make sure that as you reporters are doing your work in this area, shine a spotlight on who is it that’s trying to weaken Wall Street reform and regulations and who’s trying to strengthen them; who’s trying to strip out budgets and who’s trying to add additional resources to make sure that we’re doing the job.  And the American people should take some comfort from the fact that the people around this table, at least, have been working really hard, and they’ve actually made some really significant progress. 

We got more work to do.  And there are a whole set of issues that fall outside the issues of this regulatory body in terms of making sure that folks on Wall Street are also paying their taxes and that the tax structure is fair.  And that gets into a whole other set of arguments that I may make at another press event. 

All right?  Thank you very much, everybody.

Q    Any comments for the camera on Nancy Reagan?

THE PRESIDENT:  I had the opportunity to meet Mrs. Reagan once.  Obviously, she was already advanced in age, but could not have been more gracious and more charming to myself and Michelle when we first came into office.  I think it’s been well documented the extraordinary love that she had for her husband and the extraordinary comfort and strength that she provided him during really hard times.  As somebody who has been lucky enough to have an extraordinary partner in my life as well, I know how much she meant not just to President Reagan but to the country as a whole.  He was lucky to have her -- and I’m sure he’d be the first to acknowledge that.  So she will be missed.