|
|
人生一定要有的八個朋友: 推手(Builder)、 支柱(Champion)、 同好(Collaborator)、 夥伴(Companion)、 中介(Connector)、 開心果(Energizer)、 開路者(Mind Opener)、 導師(Navigator)。 chutze@bostonorange.com ******************* All rights of articles and photos on this website are reserved.
|
|
| ||
|
Civil Rights Groups Send Post-Affirmative Action Report to Harvard, UNC, and over 100 Additional Colleges and Universities Detailing Options for Equitable and Diverse Higher Education After the Supreme Court Decision
Accompanying Letter Urges Educational Opportunities Attainable for All
Washington, DC – Today six leading civil rights groups released a comprehensive report that offers recommendations for advancing educational equity in light of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action decisions, providing key recommendations that can increase access to equitable and diverse education. The executives of the six organizations delivered the report with a personal letter to Harvard, UNC, and over 100 additional colleges and universities.
The extensive report, co-sponsored by the Legal Defense Fund (LDF), Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law (LCCRUL), Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC (Advancing Justice – AAJC), the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), LatinoJustice PRLDEF, and the Asian American Legal Defense and Educational Fund, includes approaches that institutions can implement to increase diversity in higher education. The report offers concrete solutions to college students, education professionals, individuals, and institutions looking to further their commitment to pursuing racial equity. And it suggests ways to bring fair and robust educational opportunities to all students, paving the way for institutions to admit individuals from varied backgrounds to create a diverse campus that reflects the extensive resources and potential of our multiracial democracy.
“Regardless of the Supreme Court’s affirmative action decision, colleges and universities must do all they can to ensure equitable educational opportunities,” said Jin Hee Lee, LDF’s Director of Strategic Initiatives. “This report provides a blueprint for those in higher education to advance racial equity and foster a diverse learning environment.” “The success of our multiracial democracy hinges upon the ability to tap the talent, innovation, and potential of all Americans. It is therefore imperative to open the pipelines to educational resources and professional opportunities so that we can all benefit from the rich diversity America has to offer,” Lee added.
“The Supreme Court’s decision was a setback in the efforts to widen educational opportunities for students, especially from communities of color. But we will remain dedicated and vigilant in pushing colleges and universities to provide access to resources and opportunities for those who cannot pay their way into highly regarded schools at all levels within our educational system,” said Advancing Justice - AAJC President and Executive Director John C. Yang. “The majority of Asian Americans support affirmative action, and we will continue to fight for equitable admissions policies on their behalf as well as Black and Latino Americans.”
“In the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s ruling we need to encourage students from communities of color to continue to apply to the schools of their choice and this report advocates for policies in higher education that encourage students who have been uneasy since the Court’s decision. Our hope is that leaders take a serious look at new options to keep equity at the forefront of admission policies in our colleges and universities,” said David Hinojosa, Director of the Educational Opportunities Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.
The Supreme Court decision restricting the freedom of colleges and universities to use affirmative action does not mean schools should waver in their commitment to diversity and opportunity or retreat from their obligation to address persistent racial inequalities. Colleges can still consider race in alternative ways and students can continue to discuss race and how it has shaped their character or unique abilities in the college admissions process,” said ReNika Moore, Director of the Racial Justice Program, ACLU. “With this new resource, we aim to clarify any misinterpretation of the decision and provide much needed guidance on how to advance equal opportunity and diversity in higher ed.”
"Racial disparities in education begin long before students are ready to fill out college applications. Now that they've dismantled race-conscious admissions, the radical right is going after race-neutral efforts to achieve equal access to education, and it's no surprise that they've made K-12 education the next frontier in the campaign to roll back progress on civil rights,” said Fran Fajana, Director of Racial Justice for LatinoJustice PRLDEF. “Several cases have already been brought against K-12 schools, but all have failed so far. We will continue to defend school districts working to make their schools more fair and equitable, and we will continue to call out the hypocrisy of those fighting to block every path to educational opportunity for talented and under-identified students. This report highlighting measures, including race neutral ones, that colleges can take to keep the doors of opportunity open to all students could not be more timely."
“In the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative action, the Court distorted the history of the Equal Protection Clause and the legacy of Brown v. Board of Education to propagate a false myth of “color blindness.” Colleges and universities now confront the challenge of addressing racial disparities in the blind. This report illuminates critical guidance to leaders in higher education committed to not simply maintaining but growing a multi-racial campus, which benefits all students and our society at large,” said Bethany Li, Legal Director of the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF).
After centuries of exclusion, no single program will ever adequately address systemic racial inequality. The Supreme Court’s decision highlights the urgent need for swift and critical action in higher education to reduce discrimination and open more doors to marginalized communities.
The report includes these recommendations:
1) Diligently Comply with Anti-Discrimination Laws: Schools should take proactive measures to ensure that their policies and practices comply with federal and state antidiscrimination laws, which prohibit funding recipients from intentionally or unintentionally limiting opportunities for people based on race or ethnicity.
2) Reimagine and Retool Admissions Policies in Higher Education: Schools should engage in holistic admissions processes that evaluate applicants’ demonstrated capacity and strength, considering resources and opportunities available to them in their K-12 community. Schools should also critically examine admissions requirements, policies, and procedures to ensure that they do not create inequitable and unnecessary barriers to access.
3) Expand Recruitment Efforts and Build Robust Pipelines: Schools should develop innovative strategies to target recruitment efforts to underserved communities. This includes tailored programming for students who cannot visit campus, development of robust pipelines for students of all ages, and investment in and compensation for historically underrepresented students and alumni who serve as ambassadors for the institution in their communities.
4) Support Historically Marginalized and Underrepresented Students on Campus: A healthy, vibrant campus climate for all students is critical for ensuring equity in higher education.
Lastly, all schools have different access to resources that will inevitably drive their options for crafting a diverse class, but this report notes they also have the responsibility to do everything in their power to commit to diversity and equity in and beyond their admissions process.
The full report can be accessed here.
(Boston Orange 編譯) 「戶外 (Outdoor.com) 」這個網站最近公佈「2023對家庭最友善城市」排名,麻州的尚莫維爾市 (Somerville)排名第一,也是新英格蘭地區唯一入榜者。
「戶外」網站表示,今年的排名以全美重視提供戶外空間及公園的社區來排名,注重家庭對社區的要求,更簡單的生活,以及建立起想法相似家庭網路的機會。2023年入選城市讓人們更接近公園,娛樂設施,以及對兒童友善的康娛。2022年則是以小城市感覺卻有大城市的便利設設為重點。
在排名時,「戶外強調新鮮空氣的重要性,指出花在綠色空間的時間和減少壓力程度相關,而且總體而言,有更好的身體健康。
尚莫維爾市有60個公園,全市居民居住的地方都在走路10分鐘距離內就有個公園。
榜單前15名的城市依序為,麻州尚莫維爾市,加州Berkeley,新澤西州Cliffside
Park,維琴尼亞州的Arlington,德州的Watauga,亞利桑那州的Chandler,科羅拉多州的Denver,奧勒岡州的Portland,紐約州的Valley
Stream,加州的Garden
Grove,佛羅里達州Coral
Gables,德州的Bellaire,密西根州的Ann
Arbor,堪薩斯州的Mission,喬治亞州的Avondale
Estates。
![]() |
中華公所中文書記翁宇才(左)說明選舉細節。(周菊子攝) |
預定10月18日設宴慶祝註冊立案100週年的紐英崙中華公所,今年正好是選舉年,照慣例將改選主席,中英文書記,以及財政、核數等5個職位。
![]() |
中華公所主席雷國輝(中)報告相關事項。(周菊子攝) |
有意參選者,即日起可至中華公所辦公室索取參選表格,並於10月27日前交回中華公所。
若任何職位有2人以上參選,為了讓董事們對各參選人有更深入了解,中華公所將於11月7日晚召開特別會議,邀請參選人發表政見,並另於11月14日辦理初選。
若每一職位參選人數不多於2人,參選人的政見發表會將安排在11月28日的中華公所本年度最後一次董事大會時一併舉行。
中華公所董事謝中之在會議中提問,指出以往曾有參選人同時參選2個不同職位情況,若今年也有同樣情況發生,將如何處理。翁宇才回應表示,該參選人的2項參選申請,都將作廢。
往年,中華公所每逢選舉,各方人馬早早就開始拜會,游說,尋求支持,有哪些人參選的消息也滿天飛,今年情況卻頗為特別,不但格外安靜,坊間幾乎也沒有任何人名冒出來,有種大多數人已默認,現任主席雷國輝將繼續參選,甚至整個現任團隊都順利連任的味道。
中華公所在7月份的董事大會中曾提出要給中華公所職員加薪,主席加至每月700元,其他職員加至500元,並從2024年起實施的議案。根據7月大會,這議案原本應在9月投票決定,但26日晚,並未談及此案就散會了。
本屆中華公所選舉小組成員有翁宇才,陳建立,蔡倩婷,鄺元傑,梁利堂,關麗莎,陳秀珍,梁添光,李德源等人。其中梁利堂的董事席位已更換為聯發瓜菜東主之一的陳青。選舉小組主席翁宇才表示,梁利堂在選舉小組內的委員席位留空不補。 (更新版)