星期四, 11月 21, 2013

AMERICAN CAREER INSTITUTE SUED FOR FALSIFYING STUDENT DOCUMENTS, FAILING TO PROVIDE SERVICES

AMERICAN CAREER INSTITUTE SUED FOR FALSIFYING STUDENT DOCUMENTS, FAILING TO PROVIDE SERVICES AG Proposes New Regulations to Address Deceptive Practices in For-Profit School Industry

BOSTON – A former for-profit school in Massachusetts that abruptly closed in January has been sued over allegations that it engaged in a range of deceptive schemes to meet accreditation requirements and maximize profit to which it was not entitled, Attorney General Martha Coakley announced today.

In addition, AG Coakley has proposed new consumer protection regulations to address problems experienced by consumers when enrolling in some for-profit and occupational schools throughout the Commonwealth.

Lawsuit Filed Against American Career Institute:

The AG’s lawsuit against American Career Institute (ACI), filed today in Suffolk Superior Court, alleges the school falsified student signatures, enrollment records, attendance, and grades to receive government-funded student loan proceeds, and failed to provide students the course material and training for which they incurred tens of thousands of dollars in debt.

According to the complaint, ACI also enrolled students who did not meet minimum education qualifications, and failed to disclose that students with criminal backgrounds may have been ineligible for employment in their field of study.

“We allege this for-profit school sacrificed the wellbeing of its students for financial gain by falsifying documents,” AG Coakley said. “As a result, hundreds of former students are now left with debt and without the skills they need for a promising career.”

The AG’s Office alleges that ACI failed to refund tuitions for approximately 1,400 students in Massachusetts after the school abruptly closed in January 2013.

According to the complaint, ACI’s profits depended upon the school’s access to federal grants and loans. In fiscal year 2012, ACI collected more than $30 million in federal “Title IV” funding, an amount equal to 89 percent of its revenue. Additionally, ACI collected tuition on behalf of veterans pursuant to the Post-9/11 GI Bill and other veterans programs. Defendants allegedly falsified records to show that ACI was meeting the student grade and attendance requirements necessary to maintain its accreditation and continue collecting government-funded tuition payments. 

According to the complaint, students had to complete a 160-hour externship program before ACI could collect its entire tuition disbursement. ACI students were allegedly hurried through their coursework in order to complete the externship required to graduate from its allied health programs. Without necessary course materials and without attending required classes, students were often unprepared for externships.

Between 2008 and early 2013, ACI operated career training schools at five locations in Massachusetts – Braintree, Cambridge, Framingham, Springfield, and Woburn – offering certificate programs in the information technology and medical assistant fields that cost approximately $25,000 for one year. ACI also had campuses in Baltimore, Columbia, and Wheaton, Maryland. 

Also named in the complaint, collectively doing business as ACI, are The Career Institute LLC, Advanced Career Technologies, Inc., and ABC Training Center of Maryland, Inc.

The complaint seeks restitution to affected students, civil penalties and attorney’s fees, as well as injunctive relief to prevent additional harm arising from the defendants’ unfair or deceptive acts or practices.Investigations of other for-profit educational institutions operating in the state remain ongoing.
This case is being handled by Assistant Attorneys General Jonathan Engel, Jeffrey Walker and Division Chief Stephanie Kahn, all of AG Coakley’s Consumer Protection Division.

Proposed For-Profit and Occupational School Regulations:

In response to ongoing concerns about the practices of some for-profit schools, AG Coakley today also filed proposed amendments to existing regulations to better protect students from potentially unfair or deceptive practices. 

The new regulations would require all for-profit and occupational schools in Massachusetts to provide accurate information to the public, prohibit misleading advertising practices, and address unfair lending practices. 

The proposed changes to regulations promulgated pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A include:

·         Scope: Regulations are broader in scope than existing regulations, and would apply to all for-profit schools and occupational schools. If a school advertises to or enrolls students in Massachusetts, it would be covered by the regulations.
·         Disclosures: Schools would be required to disclose, in their advertisements and recruitment literature, accurate and readily comparable information about tuition and fees, placement statistics, graduation rates, and program completion time.
·         Prohibited practices: Schools would be prohibited from using high pressure sales tactics, including repeated solicitations through phone calls and text messages, and misrepresenting the role of recruitment personnel by referring them to “counselors” or “advisors.”

“Students are going further and further into debt, and these regulations will help protect them from high pressure sales tactics and ensure they are getting the benefits that the school has promised,” AG Coakley said. “Prospective students should at least have the most complete and accurate information possible when they are making their decisions.”
"The National Consumer Law Center applauds Attorney General Coakley's continued focus on stopping for-profit schools' use of high-pressure sales tactics and other deceptive practices," said Robyn Smith, Of Counsel for the National Consumer Law Center. "We look forward to reviewing the draft regulations and are hopeful that an expanded description of unfair and deceptive for-profit school practices will lead to increased student protection, as well as redress for students harmed by unscrupulous trade schools."
“We commend Attorney General Coakley for her leadership in protecting Massachusetts families against deceptive practices by the for-profit and occupational colleges and universities industry,” said Mary Kay Henry, president of the 2.1 million-member Service Employees International Union.  “While for-profit colleges and universities have a potentially important role in helping working adults meet the growing demand for higher education, it is important that these institutions are held accountable for their promises to the public.”

“As our organization works to promote women's economic independence and education in Massachusetts, we are pleased with the Attorney General’s ongoing efforts to enhance protections for consumers enrolling in for-profit and private occupational schools,” said Elisabeth Babcock, President and CEO of Crittenton Women’s Union. “These updated regulations, once finalized, represent an important step in ensuring that low-income individuals are protected from abusive practices in the marketplace, so that they can continue creating better futures for themselves and their families.”

The proposed regulations were filed Wednesday with the Secretary of State’s Office, amending current regulations concerning private career schools. The new regulations will establish a separate chapter to deal specifically with all occupational and for-profit schools in Massachusetts.  AG Coakley has significant concerns about the for-profit education industry in Massachusetts and across the country.

The AG’s Office will continue to work cooperatively with the Division of Professional Licensure and the Board of Higher Education to ensure consistency and clarity in our respective regulations regarding these educational businesses.

Before the regulations are officially promulgated, the AG’s Office will hold two public hearings onthe proposed regulations. The first will be in Boston on Tuesday, Jan. 7, 2014 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Leverett Saltonstall Building, 100 Cambridge Street, 2nd Floor, Room C.  A second hearing will take place in Springfield on Thursday, Jan. 9, 2014 from 10 a.m. – 2 p.m. at the Santander Bank Building, 1350 Main Street, 3rd Floor, Room A. Copies of the proposed regulatory changes, the notice of hearings, and small business impact statement will be available on the Attorney General's website at www.mass.gov/ago/regulations, or at the Attorney General’s Office, 1 Ashburton Place, Boston, MA 02108. Interested parties are encouraged to attend the hearings and provide testimony, or provide written testimony to the address provided in the notice of hearings.
AG Coakley’s Examination of For-Profit Schools:
Today’s actions are a result of AG Coakley’s comprehensive and ongoing investigation into the for-profit education industry. In April, AG Coakley launched Eliminate Deceptive Education Business Tactics (D.E.B.T.), an extensive consumer protection campaign with free educational trainings across the state anda new website offering resources for consumers related to for-profit schools. 

            In October, AG Coakley reached a $425,000 settlement to reimburse former students of Sullivan & Cogliano Training Centers, Inc., a Brockton-based for-profit career school, for allegedly misrepresenting job placement numbers and making other misleading statements about its medical field training programs. The settlement resolved the AG’s lawsuit filed in April.  
 In March, AG Coakley signaled her support for proposed federal legislation which would stop for-profit schools from spending taxpayer money on marketing. In June 2012, AG Coakley obtained $225,000 for the state in a multistate settlement with QuinStreet which resulted in the deceptive for-profit marketing website GIBill.com being taken down and handed over to the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs.

中國將重劃行政區 50省 4市或升直轄市

香港消息

中國將劃分為50個省,至少有4個城市將升格為直轄市。

《國務院出台全國新的行政區域劃分方案》
中國民政部區劃地名司司長戴均良日前在香港接受媒體採訪時透露,中國的行政區劃改革將在今年年内正式啓動,改革方案將於今後兩年内完成。改革後,中國設大約50個省政區,為此至少有4個城市將升格為直轄市。

按照中國財經網透露的消息,新增直轄市須具備以下條件:第一,必須是大的區域裡的首位中心城市,同現有直轄市保持一定距離。第二,人口不能少於200萬。第三,經濟總量應高於全國大城市平均,財政至少能自給自足。

1北京都:現轄區域不變。
2、渤海省:由現天津市、現河北省秦皇島市、唐山市、承德市、廊坊市組成,省會天津。
3、遼東省:由現遼寧省大連市、丹東市、營口市、寬甸、桓仁、岫岩組成,省會大連。
4、遼寧省:由現遼寧除上述餘下地區,合現内蒙赤峰市、哲里木盟組成,省會瀋陽。
5、吉林省:由現吉林合現内蒙興安盟組成,省會長春。
6、黑龍江省:由現黑龍江合現内蒙呼倫貝爾盟組成,省會哈爾濱。
7、雁雲省:由現山西省大同市、朔州市、忻州市、現河北省張家口市、淶源組成,省會大同。
8、平原省:由現河北省邯鄲市、刑台市、現河南省安陽市、鶴壁市、濮陽市、新市、焦作市、濟源市、現山西省長治市、晋城市組成,省會安陽。
9、内蒙古自治區:由現内蒙古自治區除上述地區以外的地區組成,首府呼和浩特。
10、山西省:由現山西除上述地區外的地區組成,省會太原。
11、河北省:由現河北除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會石家莊。
12、膠東省:由現山東省青島市、濰坊市、烟台市、威海市組成,省會青島。
13、淮海省:由現江蘇省徐州市、連雲港市、濱海、响水、灌南、宿遷市、現安徽省淮北市、蚌埠市、宿州市、毫州市、河南省商丘市、現山東省日照市、臨沂市、濟寧市、荷澤市組成,省會徐州。
14、山東省:由現山東除上述地區的餘下地區組成,省會濟南。
15上海都:包括現上海、現江蘇昆山、太倉,現浙江嘉興、寧波、舟山等地。
16、浙江省:由杭州市、桐廬、建德、淳安、湖州市、紹興市、現安徽黄山市、宣城市、現江西婺源組成,省會杭州。
17、浙南省(東甌省或雁蕩省)——由現浙江温州市、台州市、麗水市、金華市、衢州市組成,省會温州。
18、江蘇省:由蘇州市、無錫市、常州市、南通市、泰州市、淮安市、鹽城市組成。省會江陰(靖江)。
19、揚子江省:由現江蘇省南京市、江市、揚州市、現安徽省馬鞍山市、滁州市、蕪湖市、巢湖市、銅陵市、池州市、安慶市、合肥市、蚌埠市、淮南市組成,省會南京。
20、淮河省:由現安徽省六安市、阜陽市、現河南省周口市、駐馬店市、信陽地區組成,省會潢川。
21、河南省:由現河南省除上述地區外餘下地區組成,省會鄭州。
22、漢江省:由現湖北省襄樊市、十堰市、門市、州市、枝城組成,省會門。
23、三峽省:由現重慶市、現湖北省宜昌市、恩施州組成,省會重慶。
24、湖北省:由現湖北省除上述地區外餘下地區組成,省會武漢。
25、黔中省:由現湖南湘西州、懷化市、現貴州省銅仁市、黔東南州組成,省會懷化。
26、嶺南省:由現湖南省衡陽市、郴州市、現廣東省韶關市、連縣、連山、陽山、現江西省贛州市、吉安市組成,省會井崗山。
27、嶺西省:由現廣西柳州市、桂林市、河池地區、現湖南省永州市組成,省會桂林。
28、湖南省:由現湖南省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會長沙。
29、江西省:由現江西省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會南昌。
30、厦汕省:由現福建省泉州市、厦門市、漳州市、龍岩市、現廣東省汕頭市、潮州市、梅州市組成,省會厦門。
31、福建省:由現福建省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會福州。
32、香港都:由香港、澳門、現廣東省珠海市組成。
33、廣南省:由現廣東省茂名市、湛江市、現廣西防城市、欽州市、北海市、玉林市、貴港市、梧州市、賀州市組成,省會玉林。
34、廣東省:由現廣東省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會廣州。
35、廣西自治區:由現廣西除上述地區外的餘下地區合現貴州興義州、雲南文山州組成,首府南寧。
36、海南省:現海南省不變,省會海口。
37、秦巴省:由現四川省南充市、巴中市、達州市、廣安市、廣元市、現陝西省漢中市、安康市組成,省會巴中。
38、金沙江省:由現四川省攀枝花市、凉山州、九龍縣、稻城縣、鄉城縣、現雲南省東川區、昭通地區、麗江地區、迪慶州、永仁、元謀、組成,省會攀枝花。
39、南詔省(大理省):由現雲南省大理州、保山市、臨滄地區、德宏州、怒江州組成,省會保山。
40、貴州省:由現貴州省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會貴陽。
41、四川省:由現四川省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會成都。
42、雲南省:由現雲南省除上述地區外的餘下地區組成,省會昆明。
43、陝西省:由現陝西省除上述地區外的餘下地區合現甘肅省慶陽市、平凉市組成,省會西安。
44、甘肅省:由現甘肅省除上述地區外的餘下地區合内蒙額濟納旗組成,省會蘭州。
45、青海省:不變。
46、寧夏自治區:不變。
47、西藏自治區:不變。
48、北疆自治區:由現新疆吾爾自治區烏木齊市、哈密地區、吐番市、昌吉州、伊犁州、克拉瑪依市、石河子市組成,首府烏木齊。
49、南疆自治區:由現新疆巴音州、阿克蘇地區、和田地區、喀什地區、克孜州組成,首府喀什。

50、台湾省:不變。

QARI 開年會 中文名正式改為亞協服務中心

昆市亞協服務中心(QARI)十九日晚在昆市公共圖書館舉行年會,向近百名出席者報告該會“在職英語培訓”項目獲資助展延兩年, 資訊轉介項目服務了1774名移民,新聘兩名全職的成人教育,社區發展主任,等工作成績,以及青少年及新移民服務,仍將是該會服務重點的未來方向。
該會當晚還宣佈了董事會變動。創辦過音樂社,太極社的麥珍妮,開地產公司的譚健等二名資深董事,因任期年限卸任。麻州參議員Richard Moore的區域主任陳海恩,麻州公共衛生廳副總法律顧問Joel Buenaventura,以及南岸精神健康門診服務資深副總裁Paul Shaw等三人,為新任董事。其中的Paul Shaw曾任該會董事,在年限到期時卸任,現又重回董事會。
昆士亞協是個早從1998年就開始為昆市亞裔社區提供服務的非牟利機構,2001年正式成立,近年來在曾任該會董事,現為麻州眾議員的陳德基等許多人支持下,營運越來越有規模。
該會會長張永鏗(Gabriel Cheong)當晚還在會中正式宣佈,該會的中文名稱已改為“亞協服務中心”,藉以強調該會是個以服務為宗旨的機構。
行政主任約翰波達(John Brother)當晚報告了該會過去一年來經辦服務項目的成績。他指出,去年共有不下400名義工參與服務,無論是擔任輔導者的成人,為社區做義工的高中生,成為耆英朋友的潘鑒成,以及經由該會為民眾提供免費法律咨詢的六名律師,所有提供服務者,接受幫助者,都在參與中使昆市成為更美好的社區。他很驕傲地說,亞協中心去年有236名青少年服務員完成了7630小時的義務服務。
該會新聘了一名成人教育主任,辦理六班從零到四年級,每週上課的英語課,還催促學生在上英文課之外,進一步思考下一步的就業發展。該會計劃來年幫助更多新移民。
為了讓社區大眾更瞭解該會所辦服務對新移民,以及昆市整體社區的幫助,該會在編印出一本設計新穎,包括義務輔導者從25增加到42人,一對一地提供了1243小時等有許多數字的年報外,還安排了現場訪問,請使用服務者談說他們的經驗。
該會還成立了一個由12人組成的青少年董事會,自己籌辦會議,安排活動,制定工作計劃。該會董事陳黃小蘭透露,他參與輔導的其中一項活動是青少年學習創業。青少年們在節慶活動中販售飲食,紀念品,為外遊活動籌得數百元經費,讓青少年們都為既學得知識,又獲得利潤獎勵,感到興奮不已。
根據亞協服務中心的年報,該會去年的總營業額為552,920元,支出540,723元,淨結餘12,197元。

圖片說明:
           麻州眾議員陳德基(中)雖然已卸任該會董事,仍是支持該會的中間分子。左為該會會長張永鏗,右為該會行政主任約翰波達。(菊子攝)

            該會董事及嘉賓合影。前左二為新董事之一的陳海恩。(菊子攝)


            昆市不分區市議員古楚(左),擁有數家餐館的昆市居民梁戰成(右)在會場外談政治。(菊子攝)